The Danish fiscal consolidation of the early 1980s has received much scholarly attention because it was followed by an expansion of demand and output. The expansion of private consumption so far has been attributed to the expectations of future lower tax burdens. This article analyzes the outcome from a different perspective, suggesting that the decline in interest rates and also some degree of substitutability between private and public consumption played a crucial role in boosting private consumption. It shows that much of the consumption puzzle found in previous studies vanishes once the interest rate is included as an explanatory variable. This result is important from an economic policy perspective because it relates the expansionary effect to a variable that, in contrast to expectations about future tax cuts, is directly observable and more closely linked to the actual policy stance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alesina, A., and R. Perotti. 1995. Fiscal expansions and fiscal adjustments in OECD countries. Economic Policy20.
2.
Alesina, A., and R. Perotti. 1997. Fiscal adjustments in OECD countries: Composition and macroeconomic effects. IMF Staff Papers44.
3.
Andersen, T.1994. Disinflationary stabilization policy: Denmark in the 1980s. In Exchange rate policies in the Nordic countries, edited by J. Åkerholm and A. Giovannini, 100-132. London: CEPR.
4.
Bank for International Settlements. 1995. International banking and financial market developments. Basel, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements.
5.
Carlucci, F., and E. D’Elia. 1985. Ritardi informativie struttura dinamica in un modello dell’economia italiana con aspettative razionali. Note Economiche 3 (4).
Dua, P.1993. Interest rates, government purchases, and budget deficits: A forward-looking model. Public Finance Quarterly21:470-478.
8.
Fels, G., and H. -P. Froehlich. 1987. Germany and the world economy: A German view. Economic Policy4:177-194.
9.
Flavin, M.1981. The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. Journal of Political Economy89:974-1009.
10.
Giavazzi, F., and M. Pagano. 1990. Can severe fiscal contraction be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries. NBER Macroeconomics Annual1990:75-110.
11.
Giavazzi, F., and M. Pagano. 1996. Non-Keynesian effects of fiscal policy changes: International evidence and the Swedish experience. Swedish Economic Policy Review.
12.
Giovannini, E., and R. Peronaci. 1992. Aspettative e decisioni di risparmio. In Sviluppo economico e movimenti internazionali di capitali, edited by F. Parrillo. ISCONA.
13.
Gylfason, T.1981. Interest rates, inflation, and the aggregate consumption function. Review of Economics and Statistics63:233-245.
14.
Hall, R.1978. Stochastic implications of the life-cycle-permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy96:971-987.
15.
Hayashi, F.1982. The permanent income hypothesis: Estimation and testing by instrumental variables. Journal of Political Economy90:895-916.
16.
Hellwig, M., and M. Neumann. 1987. Economic policy in Germany: Was there a turnaround?Economic Policy5:103-146.
17.
International Monetary Fund. 1995. World economic outlook. Washington, DC: IMF.
18.
Keynes, J. M.1936. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.
19.
Locarno, A., and G. Parigi. 1995. Clima di fiducia e consumi delle famiglie: movente economico o psicologico? Mimeo, SADIBA.
20.
Ministry for Economic Affairs. 1983. Danish economic survey. Copenhagen: Ministry for Economic Affairs.
21.
Ministry for Economic Affairs. 1985. Danish economic survey. Copenhagen: Ministry for Economic Affairs.
22.
Muellbauer, J.1983. Surprises in the consumption function. Economic Journal93 (Suppl.): 34-50.
23.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).1983. Economic survey Denmark 1982/83. Paris: OECD.
24.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).1986. Economic survey Denmark 1985/85. Paris: OECD.
25.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).1987. Economic survey Denmark 1986/87. Paris: OECD.
26.
Rebelo, S., and C. Vegh. 1995. Real effects of exchange-rate-based stabilization: An analysis of competing theories. NBER Macroeconomics Annual1995:125-143.
27.
Reinhart, C., and C. Vegh. 1995. Nominal interest rates, consumption booms, and lack of credibility: A quantitative examination. Journal of Development Economics46:357-378.
28.
Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. 1981. Investieren für mehr Beschäftigung. Jahresgutachten/Annual Report, Stuttgart.
29.
Turnbull, G.1993. Fiscal illusion and the output expansion hypothesis. Public Finance Quarterly21:305-321.
30.
Vastrup, C.1989. Economic policy and adjustment in Denmark. In Fiscal policy, economic adjustment and financial markets, edited by M. Monti, 87-111. Washington, DC: IMF.
31.
Wickens, M. R., and H. Molana. 1984. Stochastic life cycle theory with varying interest rates and prices. Economic Journal (Suppl.): 133-147.
