This article derives the general expression for the excess burden of the property tax
in an open jurisdiction. The resulting expression corresponds to the loss of revenues
resulting from the decline in structures and from contraction of city size. Also, it
appears that if the land is municipally owned then there is no case for the imposition
of the property tax. Simulations reveal that the marginal excess burden to revenue
ratio rises exponentially and is sensitive to parameters like income level, nature of
housing preferences, technology, and so on.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnott, Richard J., and James G. Mckinnon .1977. The effects of the property tax: A general equilibrium simulation. Journal of Urban Economics4:389-407.
2.
Meiszkowski, P.1972. The property tax: An excise tax or a profits tax. Journal of Public Economics1:73-91.
3.
Muth, Richard F.1969. Cities and housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Pasha, Hafiz A.1990. The differential incidence of a land tax. Urban Studies27:591-5.
5.
Polinsky, A. Mitchell, and Daniel L. Rubinfield .1987. The long run effects of residential property tax and local public services. Journal of Public Economics5:241-62.
6.
Wheaton, William C.1974. A comparative statics analysis of urban spatial structure . Journal of Economic Theory9:223-37.