Government debt is shown to be a pareto-improving policy for the native
population in the presence of durable public goods and immigration. Debt is
therefore neither equivalent to current taxation nor neutral in its macro-economic impact. Debt may also promote a more efficientflow of immigration
by reducing the ability to free-ride on the capital provided by natives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barro, R. (1974) "Are government bonds net wealth?" J. of Pol. Econ.82(6): 1095-1117.
2.
Buchanan, J. (1958) Public Principles of Public Debt. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
3.
Buchanan, J. (1976) "Barro on the Ricardian equivalence theorem." J. of Pol. Econ.84(2): 337-342.
4.
Buchanan, J. and J. Roback (1987) "The incidence and effects of public debt in the absence of fiscal illusion." Public Finance Q.15(1): 5-25.
5.
Usher, D. (1977) "Public property and the effects of migration upon other residents of the migrants' countries of origin and destination." J. of Pol. Econ.85(5): 1001-1020.
