This article evaluates common applications of the "with and without principle"
in benefit-cost analysis. This principle is often used to analyze and justify
individual projects and purposes by comparing their separable costs with
separable benefits. These comparisons are shown to be unreliable, especially
when nonmarginal output changes are evaluated. Simple examples demonstrate
the theoretical points.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Eckstein, O. (1958) Water Resource Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
2.
Hof, J.G., R.D. Lee, A.A. Dyer, and B.M. Kent (1985) "An analysis of joint costs in a managed forest ecosystem." J. of Environmental Econ. and Management12: 338-352.
3.
Lipsey, R.G. and K. Lancaster (1956) "The general theory of second best." Rev. of Econ. Studies24: 11-32.
4.
Randall, A. (1981) Resource Economics: An Economic Approach to Natural Resource and Environmental Policy. Columbus, OH: Grid Publishing.
5.
Regan, M.M. and E.C. Weitzell (1947) "Economic evaluation of soil and water conservation measures and programs." J. of Farm Econ. (November): 1275-1294.
6.
Rideout, D. and J. Hof (1987) "Cost sharing in multiple use forestry: a game theoretic approach." Forest Science33(1): 81-88.
7.
Sassone, P.G. and W.A. Schaffer (1978) Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Handbook. New York: Academic Press.
