Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the conditions under which tax incentives for innovative energy sources can be counterproductive, thereby leading to an increased postsubsidy use of nonrenewable, conventional fuel sources. The general problem of energy-capital complementarity is extended to the residential-sector production of space heating and domestic hot water services and is empirically explored in the context of federal and state tax incentives for solar thermal processes. Regional substitution and price elasticities are estimated using pseudo data generated from an engineering process model. The results enable one to analyze a host of possible future price scenarios under which a policy of subsidization would be injudicious.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BAUMOL

W. J.

, and WOLFF

E. N.

(1981) “Subsidies to new energy sources: do they add to energy stocks?” J. of Pol. Economy 89 (October): 891-913.

BERNDT

E. R.

, and WOOD

D. O.

(1975) “Technology, prices, and the derived demand for energy.” Rev. of Economics and Statistics 57 (August): 259-268.

BERNDT

E. R.

, and WOOD

D. O.

(1979) “Engineering and econometric interpretations of energy-capital complementarity.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 69 (June): 342-354.

CHERN

W. S.

, and Lin

(1976) “Energy demand for space heating: an econometric analysis,” pp. 250-254 in American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Business and Economics Section.

FUSS

M. A.

(1977) “The demand for energy in Canadian manufacturing: an example of the estimation of production structures with many inputs.” J. of Econometrics 5 (January): 89-116.

GRIFFIN

J. M.

(1977). “Long-run production modeling with pseudo data: electric power generation.” Bell J. of Economics 8 (Spring): 112-127.

GRIFFIN

J. M.

(1979) “Statistical cost analysis revisited.” Q. J. of Economics 93 (February): 107-128.

GRIFFIN

J. M.

, and GREGORY

P. R.

(1976) “An intercountry translog model of energy substitution responses.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 66 (December): 845-857.

MAGNUS

J. R.

(1979) “Substitution between energy and non-energy inputs in the Netherlands.” Int. Econ. Rev. 20 (June): 163-164.

10.

PINDYCK

R. S.

(1979a) “Interfuel substitution and the industrial demand for energy: an international comparison.” Rev. of Economics and Statistics 61 (May): 169-179.

11.

PINDYCK

R. S.

(1979b) The Structure of World Energy Demand. Cambridge: MIT Press.

12.

Sav

G. T.

(1984) “The engineering approach to economic production functions revisited: an application to solar processes.” J. of Industrial Economics 33 (September): 21-35.

13.

Sav

G. T.

(forthcoming). “Economic models,” in Kreith

(ed.) Solar Thermal Energy Conversion Technology Status and Assessment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

14.

University of Wisconsin (1980) FCHART: A Design Program for Solar Heating Systems. Madison: Solar Energy Laboratory.

Tax Incentives for Innovative Energy Sources: Extensions of E-K Complementarity

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References