Voter perceptions of the burden from the two major indirect taxes (sales tax
and nonresidential property tax) and from income generated from wealth held
by the public sector are examined. Using two alternative median voter models, data on the finances of local school districts in Louisiana are used to estimate
voter perceptions of the burden from each revenue source. The results suggest
that Louisiana voters apparently perceive that they bear little of the burden
from either the locally imposed sales tax or the school tax levied on property
(other than the school tax levied on residential or commercial property).
Furthermore, the empirical evidence also indicates that voters do not perceive
that school expenditures financed from the income of wealth held by the public
sector could have alternatively been used for tax reduction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, H.J. (1975) Who Pays the Property Tax? Washington, DC: Brookmgs Institution.
2.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1982) Changing Public Attitudes on Government and Taxes. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office
3.
Billings, R.B. and R.N. Folsom (1980) "Voter perception of property tax incidence as revealed by school expenditure decisions." National Tax J.33 (December): 459-471.
4.
Borcherding, T.E. and R.T. Deacon (1972) "The demand for the services of nonfederal governments ." Amer. Econ. Rev.62 (December): 891-901.
5.
Buchanan, J.M. (1967) Public Finance in Democratic Process. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
6.
———( 1960) Fiscal Theory and Political Economy. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
7.
Bureau of Economic Analysis (1981) Survey of Current Business, Vol. 61. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
8.
Clotfelter, C.T. (1976) "Public spending for higher education: an empirical test of two hypotheses." Public Finance Q.31: 177-195.
9.
Commerce Clearing House (1980) State Tax Guide, All States. Chicago: author.
10.
Courant, P.N., E.M. Gramlich, and D.L. Rubinfeld (1979) "The stimulative effects of intergovernmental grants: or why money sticks where it hits," in P. Mieszkowski and W. Oakland (eds.) Fiscal Federalism and Grants-in-Aid. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
11.
Downs, A. (1960) "Why the government budget is too small in a democracy ." World Politics12: 541-563.
12.
Enrick, N. (1964) "A further study of income tax consciousness." National Tax J.17 (September): 319-321.
13.
———( 1963) "A pilot study of income tax consciousness." National Tax J.16 (June): 169-173.
14.
Ferber, R. (1954) "How aware are consumers of excise tax changes ?" National Tax J.7 (December): 355-358.
15.
Filimon, R., T. Romer, and H. Rosenthal (1982) "Asymmetric information and agenda control." J. of Public Economics17: 51-70.
16.
Goetz, C.J. (1977) "Fiscal illusion in state and local finance," pp. 176-187 in T. E. Borcherding (ed.) Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Source of Government Growth. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
17.
Gramlich, E.M. (1977) "Intergovernmental grants: a review of the empirical literature," pp. 219-239 in W. E. Oates (ed ) The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
18.
Greene, K.V. and V.G. Munley (1984) "Perceptions of the ability to export nonresidential property tax burdens." Public Finance Q.12: 117-127.
19.
Hamilton, B.W. (1983) "The flypaper effect and other anomalies." J. of Public Economics22: 347-361.
20.
Ladd, H.F. (1975) "Local education expenditures, fiscal capacity, and the composition of the property tax base." National Tax J.28 (June): 145-158.
21.
Louisiana State Department of Education (1982 ) One-Hundred Thirty-First Annual Report: Session 1979-1980 . Baton Rouge: author.
22.
May, P.J. (1982) "Local tax burdens, benefit levels and fiscal illusion ." National Tax J.35 (December): 465-476.
23.
Munley, V.G. and K.V. Greene (1978) "Fiscal illusion, the nature of public goods and equation specification." Public Choice33: 95-100.
24.
Odershook, P.C. (1979) "Property tax consciousness." Public Choice34: 285-295
25.
Pommerehne, W.W. (1978) "Institutional approaches to public expenditure: empirical evidence from Swiss municipalities." J. of Public Economics9: 255-280.
26.
———and F. Schneider (1978) "Fiscal illusion, political institutions and local public spending." Kyklos31: 381-408.
27.
Puviani, A. (1903) Teona Della Illusione Fmanziaria. Palermo.
28.
Romer, T. and H. Rosenthal (1980) "An institutional theory of the effect of intergovernmental grants." National Tax J.33 (December): 451-458.
29.
Roper Research Associates (1978) The American Public and the Income Tax System. Washington, DC: author.
30.
Schmolders, G. (1950) "Unmerkliche stevern. Finanzarchiz20: 23-34.
31.
Stanfield, R.L. (1983) "State taxes are up, but don't worry—federal taxes are down by much more." National J.15 (June): 1319-1327.
32.
———( 1982) "States find fiscal modernization has ironic outcome-empty coffers." National J.14 (August): 1379-1381.
33.
Tullock, G. (1967) Toward a Mathematics of Politics. Ann Arbor: Umv. of Michigan Press.
34.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1982) State Government Finances in 1981. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
———( 1979) 1977 Census of Governments, Finances of School Districts , Vol. 4, 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .
36.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1980) Public School Finance Program, 1978-79. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .
37.
Wagner, R.E. (1976) "Revenue structure, fiscal illusion and budgetary choice." Public Choice25 (Spring): 45-61.
