Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study uses data from a random survey of 2001 Michigan households to analyze the extent to which the Michigan ctreuit-breaker has been successful in reducing the income regressivity of the property tax and in changing relative property tax burdens. Because of its relatively extensive coverage, including renters as well as homeowners and the nonaged as well as the aged, the circuit-breaker has yielded a more equal distribution of income within Michigan. Its potential to change the distribution of income depends on the particular formula utilized, but redistributional effects have thus far been lamited because program participation has been positively correlated with income. To the extent that reductions in the price ofpublic services created by the circuit-breaker are perceived by households, the biggest stimulus appears to be in high property tax/high-income counties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaron, H.J. (1975) Who Pays the Property Tax—A New View. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

——— (1974) "What do circuit breaker laws accomplish?" in G. E. Peterson (ed.) Property Tax Reform. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Bendick, M., Jr. (1974) "Designing circuit-breaker tax relief." National Tax J. (March): 19-28.

Courant, P.N. , E.M. Gramlich , and D.L. Rubinfeld (1979) "Tax limitation and the demand for public services in Michigan." National Tax J. 32 (June): 147-157.

Gold, S.D. (1979) Property Tax Relief. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

——— (1976) "A note on the design of property tax circuit-breakers ." National Tax J. 29 (December): 477-481.

Gramlich, E.M. and D.L. Rubinfeld (1982) "Micro estimates of public spending demand functions and tests of the tiebout and median-voter hypotheses." J. of Political Economy 90: 536-560.

Grubb, W.N. and E.G. Hoachlander (1978) "Circuit-breaker schedules and their application in California." Policy Analysis 4 (Summer): 317-338.

Ihlanfeldt, K.R. (1979) "The incidence of the property tax on homeowners: evidence from the panel study of income dynamics." National Tax J. 32 (December): 535-542.

10.

Inman, R.P. (1978) "Testing political economy's 'as if' proposition: is the median income voter really decisive?" Public Choice 33: 45-65.

11.

——— and D.L. Rubinfeld (1979) "The judicial pursuit of local fiscal equity." Harvard Law Rev. 92 (June): 1662-1750.

12.

Michigan, State of (1977) "Analysis of the Michigan Individual Ineome Tax for 1977." Lansing, MI: Department of Treasury.

13.

Netzer, D. (1973) "The incidence of the property tax revisited." National Tax J. 26 (December): 515-535.

14.

——— (1966) Economics of the Property Tax. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

15.

Polinsky, A.M. and D.T. Ellwood (1979) "An empirical reconciliation of micro and grouped estimates of the demand for housing." Rev. of Economics and Statistics 61 (May): 199-205.

16.

Rubinfeld, D.L. (1977) "Voting in a local school election: a micro analysis ." Rev. of Economics and Statistics 59 (February): 30-42.

17.

Shroeder, L.D. and D.L. Sjoquist (1978) "Alternative circuit breaker programs: an analysis of the size and distribution of benefits." Public Finance Q. 6 (October).

18.

Traugott, M.W. and J.P. Katosh (1979) "Response validity in surveys of voting behavior ." Public Opinion Q. 43: 359-377.

19.

U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations [ACIR] ( 1979) Significant Features of Fiscal Federalism 1978-79. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office .

20.

——— (1975) Property Tax Circuit-Breakers: Current Status and Policy Issues. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

The Distributional Impact of Statewide Property Tax Relief: the Michigan Case

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References