Imposition of a partial factor tax (the most common example of which is a
corporation income tax) will impose an excess burden on society. That excess
burden implies a reduction in consumers' real income above and beyond the
tax transfer to the government. The incidence of the tax depends, in part, on
the way consumers react to that real income loss. In this paper we show that
omission of this effect, as occurs in the well-known Harberger model, will bias
results toward the conclusion that capitalists bear the tax burden when the
corporate sector is labor intensive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ballentine, J.G. and I. Eris (1975) "On the general equilibrium analysis of tax incidence."J. of Pol. Economy83 (June): 633-644.
2.
Harberger, A.C. (1962) "The incidence of the corporation income tax."J. of Pol. Economy70 (June): 215-240.
3.
Jones, R.W. (1971) "Distortions in factor markets and the general equilibrium model of production."J. of Pol. Economy79 (May/June): 437-459.
4.
McLure, C.E., Jr (1975) "General equilibrium incidence analysis. the Harberger model after ten years."J of Public Economics4: 125-161.
5.
Magee, S.P. (1971) "Factor market distortions, production, distribution and the pure theory of international trade."Q. J. of Economics85 (November): 623-643.
6.
Mieszkowski, P.M. (1967) "On the theory of tax incidence."J. of Pol. Economy75 (June): 250-262.
7.
Shoven, J.B. and J. Whalley (1972) "A general equilibrium calculation of the effects of differential taxation from capital in the U.S."J. of Public Economics1: 283-321.
8.
Vandendorpe, A.L. and A.F. Friedlaender (1976) "Differential incidence in the presence of initial distorting taxes."J. of Public Economics6: 205-230.