Revenue Sharing and the Intrastate Fiscal Mismatch: A Critical View

Abstract

An important stated objective of the General Revenue Sharing (GRS) program is to reduce the fiscal mismatch among local governments, especially between the problem-ridden center cities and the more affluent suburbs. To do this, the GRS intrastate allocation formula was designed to allocate funds among localities inversely with per capita income, the measure both of need and per capita fiscal capacity. The basic findings from the analysis of intrastate formula distributions are: (1) relatively little equalization in the per capita income sense occurs among localities within stales, (2) there are substantial variations in the degree of equalization among states, and (3) the lac of and differences in equalization can largely be explained by the role of the tax variable in the formula. Therefore, the formula requires change if it is to perform its equalization role satisfactorily. Some proposals formula change are made.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barro

S. M.

(1975) “Equalization and equity in general revenue sharing: An analysis of alternative distribution formulas. Part 1: Alternative interstate distribution formulas.” A working note prepared for the National Science Foundation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

Break

G. F.

(1971) “Revenue sharing: Its implications for present and future intergovernmental fiscal systems: The case for.” National Tax J. 24 (September): 307–312.

Break

G. F.

(1967) Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings.

Johansen

(1965) Public Economics. Chicago: Rand McNally.

McDonagh

E. C.

Simpson

J. E.

[eds.] (1969) Social Problems: Persistent Challenges (second ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

National Science Foundation (1975) “General revenue sharing research utilization project, vols. 1, 3, and 5.” Prepared by Research Applied to National Needs. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Reuss

H. S.

(1975) “Should we abandon revenue sharing?” Annals of the Amer. Academy of Pol. & Social Sciences 419 (May): 88–99.

Ross

J. P.

(1975) “Alternative formulae for general revenue sharing: Population based measures of need.” Prepared for the National Science Foundation. Blacksburg, VA.: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Sorkin

Weeks

Freitag

(1973) “The use of social indicators in allocating state mental health funds.” Presented at the Urban Regional Information Systems Association Conference, Atlantic City, NJ, August.

10.

Thompson

R. E.

(1973) Revenue Sharing: A New Era in Federalism. Washington, DC: Revenue Sharing Advisory Service.

11.

Thurow

(1970) “Aid to state and local governments.” National Tax J. 23 (March): 23–35.

12.

Tomer

J. F.

(1976) “The revenue sharing allocation formula and equalization: the problem and a proposal for change.” Presented at the Eastern Economic Association Conference, Bloomsburg State College, Bloomsburg, PA, April.

13.

Congress

U.S.

(1973) “General Explanation of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act and the Federal-State Tax Collection Act of 1972.” Prepared by the Staff of the Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

14.

U.S. Department of the Treasury (1973a) Final Data Elements: Entitlement Periods 1, 2, and 3. Prepared by the Office of Revenue Sharing. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

15.

U.S. Department of the Treasury (1973b) 4th Entitlement Period Allocations with Adjustments for Entitlement Periods 1, 2, and 3. Prepared by the Office of Revenue Sharing. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.