Distributions of income after allocating all government taxes and expenditures to households are compared over two decades. Extending prior work back an additional decade and adding extensive sensitivity analyses leave our earlier conclusions unaffected. Specifically, despite efforts towards a more egalitarian distribution and a sizable increase in benefits accruing to the low end of the distribution, aggregate income dispersion in final distributions changed very little between 1950 and 1970.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronH.MusgraveR. A. (1974) “The property tax: Progressive or regressive?”Papers and Proceedings of the Amer. Econ. Association64 (May): 212–235.
2.
AtkinsonA. B. (1970) “On the measurement of inequality.”J. of Econ. Theory2 (September): 244–263.
3.
BishopG. A. (1967) Tax Burdens and Benefits of Government Expenditures by Income Class, 1961 and 1965. New York: Tax Foundation.
4.
BishopG. A. (1966) “Income redistribution in the framework of the national income accounts.”National Tax J. 19 (December): 378–390.
5.
BrowningE. K. (1976) “On the distribution of net income.”Southern Econ. J.43 (July): 912–923.
6.
ChampernowneD. G. (1974) “A comparison of measures of inequality of income distribution.”Econ. J.84 (December): 787–816.
7.
ChowG. C. (1960) “Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions.”Econometrica28 (July): 591–605.
8.
ConradA. H. (1954) “Redistribution through government budgets in the United States, 1950,” in PeacockA. T. (ed.) Income Redistribution and Social Policy. London: Jonathan Cape.
9.
DasguptaP.SenA.StarrettD. (1973) “Notes on the measurement of inequality.”J. of Econ. Theory6 (April): 180–187.
10.
GillespieW. I. (1965) “Effects of public expenditures on the distribution of income,” in MusgraveR. A. (ed.) Essays in Fiscal Federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings.
11.
JohnstonJ. (1963) Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
KakwaniN. C.PodderN. (1973) “On the estimation of Lorenz curves from grouped ovservations.”International Econ. Rev.14 (June): 278–292.
13.
KatonaG.LiningerC. A.KosobudR. F. (1963) 1962 Survey of Consumer Finances. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center.
14.
LydallH. (1968) The Structure of Earnings. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
15.
MeermanJ. P. (1974) “The definition of income in studies of budget incidence and income distribution.”Rev. of Income & Wealth20 (December): 515–522.
16.
MusgraveR.CaseK.LeonardH. (1974) “The distribution of fiscal burdens and benefits.”Public Finance Q. 2 (July): 259–300.
17.
PechmanJ.OknerR. (1974) Who Bears the Tax Burden?Washington, DC: Brookings.
18.
ReynoldsM.SmolenskyE. (1977) Public Expenditures, Taxes and the Distribution of Income. New York: Academic Press.
19.
ReynoldsM.SmolenskyE. (1976) “Why changing the size distribution through the fisc is now more difficult: hypotheses from the U.S. experience.” Presented at the Thirty-Second Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance, Edinburgh, Scotland, September, [to be published in the IIPF Papers and Proceedings: Public Finance/Finance Publiques (forthcoming)].
20.
ReynoldsM.SmolenskyE. (1974) “The post-fisc distribution: 1961 and 1970 compared.”National Tax J. 27 (December): 515–530.
21.
SheshinskiE. (1972) “Relation between a social welfare function and the Gini index of income inequality.”J. of Econ. Theory4 (February): 98–100.
22.
StarkT. (1972) The Distribution of Personal Income in the United Kingdom, 1949–1963. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.
23.
ThompsonE. (1974) “Taxation and national defense.”J. of Pol. Economy82 (July/August): 755–782.
24.
TullockG. (1971) “The charity of the uncharitable.”Western Econ. J.9 (December): 379–392.
25.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1971) Consumer Expenditures and Income: Survey Guidelines. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, BLS Bulletin 1684.
26.
WilesP. (1974) Distribution of Income: East and West. Amsterdam: North Holland.
