It
is well known that Marshall's measure of consumer's surplus is an
underestimator of Hicks' equivalent variation of consumer's surplus when
the points under consideration are on the consumer's demand curve. In this
note it is shown that when the points are not both on the demand curve, a
common situation for many policy questions, Marshall's measure may
become an overestimator of Hick's measure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Desalvo, J. (1975) "Benefits and costs of New York City's middle-income housing program." J. of Pol. Economy83 (August): 791-806.
2.
Foster, C.D. and H. Neuberger (1974) "The ambiguity of the consumer's surplus measure of welfare change." Oxford Economic Papers (New Series) 26 (March): 66-77.
3.
Hicks, J.R. (1956) A Revision of Demand Theory. Oxford, Eng.: Clarendon.
4.
——— (1939) Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon.
5.
Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics. London : Macmillan.
6.
Murray, M.P. (1975) "The distribution of tenant benefits in public housing." Econometrica43 (July): 771-778.
7.
Olsen, E.O. (1972) "An econometric analysis of rent control." J. of Pol. Economy80 (November/December): 1081-1100.
8.
Silberberg, E. (1972) "Duality and the many consumer's surpluses." Amer. Econ. Rev.62 (December): 942-952.
9.
Willig, R. (1973) "Consumer's surplus: a rigorous cookbook." Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, technical report number 98 (May).
10.
Winch, D.M. (1965) "Consumer's surplus and the compensating principle ." Amer. Econ. Rev.55 (June): 395-423.
