This study provides statistical estimates of the incidence of Puerto Rico's fiscal system. In developing the estimates the openness of the Commonwealth's economy and its particular internal economic structure are taken into account. The tax system is found to be slightly progressive across income classes, whereas the public expenditure structure is found to be regressive (favoring the lower income classes). Thus, the overall fiscal system redistributes real incomes from higher to lower income classes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronH.McGuireM. (1970) “Public goods and income distribution.”Econometrica38 (November): 907–920.
2.
BirdR. M.De WulfL. (1973) “Taxation and income distribution in Latin America: A critical review of empirical studies.”IMF Staff Papers20 (November): 639–682.
3.
BrittainJ. A. (1972) The Payroll Tax for Social Security. Washington: Brookings.
4.
DeranE. (1967) “Changes in factor income shares under the social security tax.”Rev. of Economics and Statistics49 (November): 627–630.
5.
De WulfL. (1975) “Fiscal incidence studies in developing countries: Survey and critique.”IMF Staff Papers22 (March): 61–131.
6.
GillespieW. I. (1966) The Incidence of Taxes and Public Expenditures in the Canadian Economy. Study No. 2 of the Royal Commission on Taxation. Ottawa: Queen's Printer.
7.
MaitalS. (1973) “Public goods and income distribution: Some further results.”Econometrica41 (May): 561–568.
8.
McClureC. (1964) “Commodity tax incidence in open economies.”National Tax Journal17 (June): 187–204.
9.
McClureC. (1969) “The inter-regional incidence of general regional taxes.”Public Finance24 (September): 457–484.
10.
MieszkowskiP. (1972) “The property tax: An excise tax or a profits tax?”J. of Public Economics1 (April): 73–96.
11.
PrestA. R. (1955) “Statistical calculations of the tax burden.”Economica22 (August): 234–245.
12.
ShoupC. S. (1969) Public Finance. Chicago: Aldine.
