Conventional education finance literature, even including the reform literature surrounding the Serrano and Rodriguez cases, holds that foundation programs are more equalizing than flat grants. This article demonstrates that there is no theoretical basis for this conclusion. It further shows that equalized apportionment formulas are less cryptic approaches for achieving the goals of foundation programs than the approaches which attempt to “key” on particular school districts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BensonC. (1968) The Economics of Public Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
CoonsJ.CluneW.SugarmanS. (1970) Private Wealth and Public Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
3.
CornellF. G. (1947) “Grants-in-aid apportionment formulas.”J. of Amer. Stat. Assn. (March): 92–104.
4.
JohnsR.AlexanderK. (1971) Alternative Programs for Financing Education. Volume 5. Gainesville, Fla.: National Education Finance Project.
5.
MusgraveR. A. (1961) “Approaches to a fiscal theory of political federalism.” pp. 97–122 in National Bureau of Economic Research, Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Utilization. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton Univ. Press.
