A global trend, represented by the case of Italy, is that of movable cultural heritage hidden – and often not properly recorded – in public museums’ warehouses. Legal frameworks pose limits to privatization in the management of cultural assets. We propose the creation of a regulated market for tradable, long-term concessions of movable artwork to encourage selected private operators to invest in artwork's extraction from public museums’ warehouses. The social and monetary value that fiscally constrained countries can derive from once-hidden public cultural heritage would outweigh that of traditional means of exploiting the value of artwork. At the same time, public ownership of the extracted works of art would be retained.
AngeiF.2020. Quanto spende l’Italia in cultura? (Italian) [How much does Italy spend in culture?]. Milan, Italy: Osservatorio sui Conti Pubblici Italiani.
2.
AxaA. R. T.2018. IN & OUT: Guida pratica al prestito di opere d’arte. (Italian) [IN & OUT: Practical Guide to Artwork Lending].
BertacchiniE.LiuzzaC.MeskellL.SacconeD.. 2016. “The Politicization of UNESCO World Heritage Decision Making.” Public Choice167 (1): 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0332-9.
5.
BertacchiniE.NogareC. D.. 2014. “Public Provision vs. Outsourcing of Cultural Services: Evidence from Italian Cities.” European Journal of Political Economy35: 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.06.004.
6.
BertacchiniE. E.NogareC. D.ScuderiR.. 2018. “Ownership, Organization Structure and Public Service Provision: The Case of Museums.” Journal of Cultural Economics42 (4): 619–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-018-9321-9.
7.
BodoC.BodoS.. 2016. Country profile - Italy. in: Compendium of cultural policies and trends in Europe. Council of Europe.
8.
CarmignaniM.CavazzoniF.PeròN.. 2012. Un patrimonio invisibile e inaccessibile. (Italian) [An invisible and inaccessible heritage]. IBL Briefing Paper n.111.
9.
CelliniR.CucciaT.LisiD.. 2020. “Spatial Dependence in Museum Services: An Analysis of the Italian Case.” Journal of Cultural Economics44 (4): 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-019-09373-0.
10.
Credit Suisse. 2020. Collectibles: An Integral Part of Wealth.
11.
Deloitte. 2019. Art & Finance Report. Deloitte & ArtTactic, Report n. 6.
12.
Di GaetanoL.MazzaI.. 2017. “Better an egg Today Than a hen Tomorrow?” On the Implications of Deaccess Policies on Donations to Museums.” Journal of Cultural Economics41 (3): 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-015-9262-5.
GuccioC.MartoranaM.MazzaI.PignataroG.RizzoI.. 2020. “An analysis of the managerial performance of italian museums using a generalised conditional efficiency model.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences72: 100891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100891.
15.
HirshleiferJ.1976. Price Theory and Applications. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
ICOM Italia. 2018. Raccomandazione sui Prestiti per Mostre. (Italian) [Recommendations on Exhibit Lending].
17.
ImperialeF.VeccoM.. 2017. “Deaccessioning and Capitalisation in Museums from an International Perspective.” Cultural Management: Science & Education1 (2): 17–32. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.1-2.02.
MazzantiM.2002. “Cultural Heritage as Multi-Dimensional, Multi-Value and Multi- Attribute Economic Good: Toward a new Framework for Economic Analysis and Valuation.” The Journal of Socio-Economics31 (5): 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00133-6.
20.
Metropolitan Museum of Art. 2020. Collections Management Policy. 2.
21.
Muriel-RamirezM. J.2017. “Institutional Foundations of Heritage Railways: The High Cost of Low Trust in the Preservation of Merit Goods.” Journal of Economic Issues51 (3): 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1353875.
22.
Natural History Museum. 2019. Natural History Museum Collections Access & Information Policy 2019.
23.
PetterssonS.Hagedorn-SaupeM.JyrkkïoT.WeijA.. 2010. Encouraging Collections Mobility – A Way Forward for Museums in Europe. Collections Mobility 2.0, Lending for Europe 21st Century.
24.
Pinacoteca di Brera. 2020. Linee guida prestiti.
25.
SimonJ. L.1994. “The Airline Oversales Auction Plan: The Results.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy28 (3): 319–323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20053049.
26.
SobelR. S.ClarkJ. R.SobelR. N.. 2022. “The Curse of Historic Resources.” Public Finance Review50 (3): 279–306.
27.
ThrosbyD.2003. “Determining the Value of Cultural Goods: How Much (or How Little) Does Contingent Valuation Tell Us?” Journal of Cultural Economics27 (3): 275–285.
28.
UNESCO. 2015. Recommendation concerning the Protection and Promotion of Muse- ums and Collections, their Diversity and their Role in Society.
29.
UNESCO. 2019. Report on the implementation of the UNESCO 2015 Recommendation on Museums & Collections.
30.
VeccoM.PiazzaiM.. 2015. “Deaccessioning of Museum Collections: What Do We Know and Where Do We Stand in Europe?” Journal of Cultural Heritage16: 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.03.007.
31.
VeccoM.SrakarA.PiazzaiM.. 2017. “Visitor Attitudes Toward Deaccessioning in Italian Public Museums: An Econometric Analysis.” Poetics63 (C): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2017.05.001.
32.
Western Australian Museum. 2015. Loans policy and procedures.
33.
WhitakerA.KräusslR.. 2020. “Blockchain, Fractional Ownership, and the Future of Creative Work.” Management Science66 (10): 4591–4611. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3633.
34.
WijsmullerD.2017. Deaccessioning & disposal in Europe 2008-2017: A research on possibilities and attitudes across the European Member States. Mondriaan fund paper.
