This paper examines whether state and local political leaders’ partisan affiliations affect economic freedom at the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) level. Because political leaders’ partisan affiliations likely correlate with unobserved state- and local-level characteristics that also affect the economic freedom levels of MSAs, we use a regression discontinuity design that leverages close elections as natural experiments to identify a causal effect. Using Stansel (2019)’s index, which aggregates a bundle of policies into a single measure of economic freedom, we find that close Republican majorities in the lower State House increase overall MSA-level economic freedom. This effect is realized through consistent governments (i.e., Republican governor and Republican State House majority) and primarily through changes in labor market policy. At the city level, Republican mayors also increase overall MSA-level economic freedom levels.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS.. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies41: 12–22.
2.
AlesinaA.RosenthalH.. 1996. “A Theory of Divided Government.” Econometrica64 (6): 1311–41.
3.
ArifImranHofferA.StanselD.LacombeD.. 2020. “Economic Freedom and Migration: A Metro Area-level Analysis.” 47 (1): 170–90.
4.
AshE. 2016. “The Political Economy of Tax Laws in the US States.” Unpublished Manuscript, University of Warwick, Coventry.
5.
BelandL.-P.2015. “Political Parties and Labor-market Outcomes: Evidence From Us States.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics7 (4): 198–220.
6.
BelandL.-P.OloomiS.. 2017. “Party Affiliation and Public Spending: Evidence From U.s. Governors.” Economic Inquiry55 (2): 982–95.
7.
BelandL.-P.UnelB.. 2018. “The Impact of Party Affiliation of Us Governors on Immigrants’ Labor Market Outcomes.” Journal of Population Economics31 (2): 627–70.
8.
BelandL.-P.UnelB.. 2019. “Politics and Entrepreneurship in the US.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique52 (1): 33–57.
9.
BergquistP. 2019. “Controlling the Regulators: How Party Control of Government Shapes Environmental Regulation in the 21st Century.” working paper.
10.
BesleyT.PerssonT.SturmD. M.. 2010. “Political Competition, Policy and Growth: Theory and Evidence From the US.” The Review of Economic Studies77 (4): 1329–52.
11.
BjørnskovC.PotrafkeN.. 2013. The Size and Scope of Government in the US States: Does Part Ideology Matter? CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4246.
12.
CahanD.PotrafkeN.. 2017. “The Democratic-republican Presidential Growth Gap and the Partisan Balance of the State Governments.” CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6517.
13.
CalanicoS.CattaneoM.FarrellM.TitiunikR.. 2019. “Regression Discontinuity Designs Using Covariates.” The Review of Economics and Statistics101 (3): 442–51.
14.
CattaneoM. D.JanssonM.MaX.. 2018. “Manipulation Testing Based on Density Discontinuity.” The Stata Journal18 (1): 234–61.
15.
de Benedictis-KessnerJ. 2017. “Off-cycle and out of Office: Election Timing and the Incumbency Advantage.” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 119–32.
16.
de Benedictis-KessnerJ.WarshawC.. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics78 (4): 1124–38.
17.
De HaanJ.SturmJ.-E.. 2000. “On the Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth.” European Journal of Political Economy16 (2): 215–41.
18.
FeigenbaumJ.FouirnaiesA.HallA.. 2017. “The Majority-party Disadvantage: Revising Theories of Legislative Organization.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science12 (3): 269–300.
19.
FerreiraF.GyourkoJ.. 2009. “Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence From US Cities.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics124 (1): 399–422.
20.
GerberE. R.HopkinsD. J.. 2011. “When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy.” American Journal of Political Science55 (2): 326–39.
21.
HallJ. C.LawsonR. A.. 2014. “Economic Freedom of the World: An Accounting of the Literature.” Contemporary Economic Policy32 (1): 1–19.
22.
HankinsW. B.HooverG. A.. 2019. “Do Democratic Governors Lower Economic Freedom? A Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice34 (2): 101–26.
23.
ImbensG.KalyanaramanK.. 2012. “Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator.” The Review of Economic Studies79 (3): 933–59.
LawsonR. A.MurphyR.PowellB.. 2020. “The Determinants of Economic Freedom: A Survey.” Contemporary Economic Policy38 (4): 622–42.
26.
LeeD. 2001. “The Electoral Advantage to Incumbency and Voters’ Valuation of Politicians’ Experience: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of Elections to the US House.” working paper.
27.
LeeD. 2008. “Randomized Experiments From Non-random Selection in Us House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics142 (2): 675–97.
28.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT.. 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature48 (2): 281–355.
MeyerA. 2019. “Elite Influence on Climate Change Skepticism: Evidence From Close Gubernatorial Elections.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists6 (4): 783–822.
31.
MillsapA.HobbsB.StanselD.. 2019. “Local Governments and Economic Freedom: A Test of the Leviathan Hypothesis.” Public Finance Review47 (3): 493–529.
PotrafkeN. 2018. “Government Ideology and Economic Policy-making in the United States—a Survey.” Public choice174 (1): 145–207.
34.
PrimoD. M. 2006. “Stop Us Before We Spend Again: Institutional Constraints on Government Spending.” Economics & Politics18 (3): 269–312.
35.
RaffZ.MeyerA.WalterJ.. 2022. “Political Differences in Air Pollution Abatement Under the Clean Air Act.” Journal of Public Economics212: 104688.
36.
ReedW. 2006. “Democrats, Republicans, and Taxes: Evidence that Political Parties Matter.” Journal of Public Economics90 (4-5): 725–50.
37.
RepettoL.Sosa AndrésM.. 2022. Divided Government and Polarization: Regression-discontinuity Evidence from US States.
38.
ShakyaS.PlemmonsA. 2021. “The Impact of Economic Freedom on Startups.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy51 (1): 29–42.
39.
StanselD. 2013. “An Economic Freedom Index for US Metropolitan Areas.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy43 (1): 3–20.
40.
StanselD. 2019. “Economic Freedom in US Metropolitan Areas.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy49 (1): 40–8.
41.
StanselD.TuszynskiM. P. 2018. “Sub-national Economic Freedom: A Review and Analysis of the Literature.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy48 (1): 61–71.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
