This article investigates the distortionary impacts of tax base mobility and external ownership on public input provision. Regional governments compete for mobile tax bases (e.g., business capital). The impact of regional public policy partially accrues to non-residents because immobile factors (e.g., business land) are subject to external ownership. This article derives an optimal rule for regional public input provision that illustrates how these two distortionary impacts depend on the nature of production functions. The impact of external ownership is particularly complex. To explore this impact in detail, the case of production functions with constant elasticity of substitution is examined. Public inputs with different productivity impacts yield fairly different implications of external ownership for inefficient public input provision.
ArnottRichard J.GriesonRonald E.. 1981. “Optimal Fiscal Policy for A State or Local Government.” Journal of Urban Economics9 (1): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(81)90046-2
2.
BatinaRaymond G. 2017. “Is Policy Coordination A Good Idea? Public Inputs and Policy Harmonization with Skilled and Unskilled Workers.” Public Finance Review45 (3): 423–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142116644777
BraidRalph M. 1993. “Spatial Competition Between Jurisdictions Which tax Perfectly Competitive Retail (or Production) Centers.” Journal of Urban Economics34 (1): 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1993.1026
5.
BraidRalph. M.2005. “Property Taxes, Wage Taxes and tax Exporting with Multiple Jurisdictions in Each Metropolitan Area.” Journal of Public Economics89 (9–10): 1789–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.04.004
6.
BronziniRaffaeroPiselliPaolo. 2009. “Determinants of Long-run Regional Productivity with Geographical Spillovers: The Role of R&D, Human Capital and Public Infrastructure.” Regional Science Urban Economics39 (2): 187–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.07.002
7.
DickescheidThomas. 2000. “Capital Income Taxation, Cross-Ownership and the Structure of Public Spending.” Finanz-archiv57 (4): 435–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40912941
FisherPeter S.PetersAlan H.1998. Industrial Incentives: Competition among American States and Cities. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan.
10.
FuestClemensHuberBerndMintzJack. 2005. “Capital Mobility and tax Competition.” Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics1: 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1561/0700000001
11.
GuglElisabethZodrowGeorge R.2019. “Tax Competition and the Efficiency of Benefit-Related Business Taxes.” International Tax and Public Finance26 (3): 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9514-3
12.
HaughwoutAndrew F. 2002. “Public Infrastructure Investments, Productivity and Welfare in Fixed Geographical Areas.” Journal of Public Economics83 (3): 405–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00164-X
13.
HaughwoutAndrew. F.InmanRobert P.2001. “Fiscal Policies in Open Cities with Firms and Households.” Regional Science and Urban Economic31 (2–3): 147–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00059-4
14.
HillmanArye L. 1978. “Symmetries and Asymmetries Between Public Input and Public Good Equilibria.” Public Finance33 (3): 269–79. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pfi/pubfin/v33y1978i3p269-79.html
15.
HindriksJeanPeraltaSusanaWeberShlomo. 2008. “Competing in Taxes and Investment Under Fiscal Equalization.” Journal of Public Economics92 (12): 2392–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.012
KlumpRainerMcAdamPeterWillmanAlpo. 2007. “Factor Substitution and Factor-Augmenting Technical Progress in the United States: A Normalized Supply-side System Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics89 (1): 183–92. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.1.183
18.
LeeKangoh. 2003a. “Factor Ownership and Governmental Strategic Interaction.” Journal of Public Economic Theory5 (2): 345–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9779.00136
19.
LeeKangoh. 2003b. “Should Land and Capital be Taxed at A Uniform Rate?” Canadian Journal of Economics36 (2): 350–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00004
20.
León-LedesmaMiguel A.McAdamPeterWillmanAlpo. 2010. “Identifying the Elasticity of Substitution with Biased Technical Change.” American Economic Review100 (4): 1330–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00004
MatsumotoMutsumi. 2010. “Entry in tax Competition: A Note.” International Tax and Public Finance17 (6): 627–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-010-9131-2
MatsumotoMutsumiSugaharaKota. 2017. “A Note on Production Taxation and Public-Input Provision.” Annals of Regional Science59 (2): 419–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0837-2
ParkIn Kwonvon RabenauBurkhard. 2011. “Disentangling Aggregation Economies: Agents, Sources, and Spatial Dependence.” Journal of Regional Science51 (5): 897–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00719.x
31.
RichterWolfram. F.WellischDietmar. 1996. “The Provision of Local Public Goods and Factors in the Presence of Firm and Household Mobility.” Journal of Public Economics60 (1): 73–93.
32.
ValentinyiÁkosHerrendorfBerthold. 2008. “Measuring Factor Income Shares at the Sectoral Level.” Review of Economic Dynamics11 (4): 820–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2008.02.003
33.
WagnerWolfEijffingerSylvester. 2008. “Efficiency of Capital Taxation in an Open Economy: Tax Competition Versus tax Exportation.” International Tax and Public Finance15 (6): 637–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9087-7
34.
WildasinDavid E. 1986. Urban Public Finance. chur-london-paris-newyork: Harwood Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00028-0
35.
WildasinDavid E.WilsonJohn D.. 1998. “Risky Local tax Bases: Risk-Pooling vs. Rent Capture.” Journal of Public Economics69 (2): 229–47.
ZodrowGeorge R.MieszkowskiPeter. 1986. “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods.” Journal of Urban Economics19 (3): 356–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(86)90048-3
