We investigate whether left-wing governments decrease wage inequality among civil servants. The data are based on the salaries of civil servants in the German states. Since a reform in 2006, German state governments are allowed to design salaries of civil servants. We employ encompassing data for pay levels and professions including judges, professors, policemen, and administrators and distinguish between levels of operating experiences. We use six wage inequality measures comparing salaries across pay levels and operating experiences. The results do not suggest that left-wing governments were more active in decreasing wage inequality among civil servants than the center or right-wing governments. Cabinet members are civil servants themselves and decide on their own salaries: government ideology is also not shown to predict the salaries of cabinet members. Because left-wing governments are perceived as taking action against income and wage inequality, future research should employ data from other federal states such as the United States to examine how government ideology influences the salaries of civil servants.
AlesinaAlberto. 1987. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-party System as a Repeated Game.” Quarterly Journal of Economics102:651–78.
2.
AngelopoulosKonstantinosEconomidesGeorgeKammasPantelis. 2012. “Does Cabinet Ideology Matter for the Structure of Tax Policies?” European Journal of Political Economy28:620–35.
3.
BenitoBernardinoBastidaFranciscoRíosAna-MaríaVicenteCristina. 2014. “The Causes of Legal Rents Extraction: Evidence from Spanish Municipalities.” Public Choice161:367–83.
4.
BerghAndreasMirkinaIrinaNilssonTherese. 2020. “Can Social Expenditure Cushion the Inequality Effect of Globalization?” Economics and Politics32:104–42.
5.
BerghAndreasNilssonTherese. 2010. “Do Liberalization and Globalization Increase Income Inequality?” European Journal of Political Economy26:488–505.
6.
BischoffIvoHauschildtJulia. (forthcoming). “Party Ideology and Vocational Education Spending: Empirical Evidence from Germany.” CESifo Economic Studies.
7.
BjørnskovChristian. 2008. “The Growth-inequality Association: Government Ideology Matters.” Journal of Development Economics87:300–308.
8.
BorjasGeorge J.1984. “Electoral Cycles and the Earnings of Federal Bureaucrats.” Economic Inquiry22:447–59.
9.
BoveVincenzoEfthyvoulouGeorgiosNavasAntonio. 2017. “Political Cycles in Public Expenditure: Butter vs Guns.” Journal of Comparative Economics45:582–604.
10.
ChappellHenry W.JrKeechWilliam R.. 1986. “Party Differences in Macroeconomic Policies and Outcomes.” American Economic Review76:71–74.
11.
De DonderPhilippeHindriksJean. 2007. “Equilibrium Social Insurance with Policy-motivated Parties.” European Journal of Political Economy23:624–40.
12.
Di TellaRafaelFismanRaymond. 2004. “Are Politicians Really Paid like Bureaucrats?” Journal of Law and Economics47:477–513.
13.
DornFlorianFuestClemensPotrafkeNiklas. 2017. “Globalisation and Income Inequality Revisited.” European Commission Discussion Paper No. 056. Brussels: European Commission.
14.
DornFlorianSchinkeChristoph. 2018. “Top Income Shares in OECD Countries: The Role of Government Ideology and Globalization.” World Economy41:2491–527.
15.
DreherAxelGastonNoel. 2008. “Has Globalisation Increased Inequality?” Review of International Economics16:516–36.
16.
HerwartzHelmutTheilenBernd. 2017. “Ideology and Redistribution through Public Spending.” European Journal of Political Economy46:74–90.
17.
HibbsDouglas A.Jr. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review71:1467–87.
18.
HuberPeter J.1967. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Nonstandard Conditions.” In LM Le Cam and J Neyman (eds)Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics, 221–33. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
KarmannAlexanderRoeselFelix. 2017. “Hospital Policy and Productivity—Evidence from German States.” Health Economics26:1548–65.
20.
KauderBjörnKrauseManuelaPotrafkeNiklas. 2018. “Electoral Cycles in MPs’ Salaries: Evidence from the German States.” International Tax and Public Finance25:981–1000.
21.
KauderBjörnPotrafkeNiklas. 2013. “Government Ideology and Tuition Fee Policy: Evidence from the German States.” CESifo Economic Studies29:628–49.
22.
KauderBjörnPotrafkeNiklasSchinkeChristoph. 2017. “Manipulating Fiscal Forecasts: Evidence from the German States.” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis73:213–36.
23.
KrauseManuelaPotrafkeNiklas. 2020. “The Real-estate Transfer Tax and Government Ideology: Evidence from the German States.” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis76:100–120.
24.
LangValentin F.TavaresMarina Mendes. 2018. “The Distribution of Gains from Globalization.” IMF Working Paper No. 18/54. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
25.
LindJo Thori. 2020. “Rainy Day Politics: An Instrumental Variables Approach to the Effect of Parties on Political Outcomes.” European Journal of Political Economy61:101821.
26.
OberndorferUlrichSteinerViktor. 2007. “Generationen- oder Parteienkonflikt? Eine empirische Analyse der deutschen Hochschulausgaben.” Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik8:165–83.
27.
OsterlohSteffenDebusMarc. 2012. “Partisan Politics in Corporate Taxation.” European Journal of Political Economy28:192–207.
28.
PleningerReginaJan-EgbertSturmde HaanJakob. 2019. “The “Forgotten” Middle Class an Analysis of the Effects of Globalization.” KOF Working Paper No. 466.
29.
PilnyAdamRoeselFelix. 2020. “Are Doctors Better Health Ministers?” American Journal of Health Economics6:498–532.
30.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2009. “Did Globalization Restrict Partisan Politics? An Empirical Evaluation of Social Expenditures in a Panel of OECD Countries.” Public Choice140:105–24.
31.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2011. “Public Expenditures on Education and Cultural Affairs in the West German States: Does Government Ideology Influence the Budget Composition?” German Economic Review12:124–45.
32.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2013. “Economic Freedom and Government Ideology across the German States.” Regional Studies47:433–49.
33.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2017. “Partisan Politics: The Empirical Evidence from OECD Panel Studies.” Journal of Comparative Economics45:712–50.
34.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2018. “Government Ideology and Economic Policy-making in the United States—A Survey.” Public Choice174:145–207.
35.
PotrafkeNiklas. 2020. “Dragnet-controls and Government Ideology.” Defence and Peace Economics31:485–501.
36.
PotrafkeNiklasRiemMarinaSchinkeChristoph. 2016. “Debt Brakes in the German States: Governments’ Rhetoric and Actions.” German Economic Review17:253–75.
37.
PotrafkeNiklasRoeselFelix. 2020. “The Urban–Rural Gap in Healthcare Infrastructure: Does Government Ideology Matter?” Regional Studies54:340–51.
38.
SavageLee. 2019. “The Politics of Social Spending after the Great Recession: The Return of Partisan Policy Making.” Governance32:123–41.
39.
ScheveKennethStavasageDavid. 2009. “Institutions, Partisanship, and Inequality in the Long Run.” World Politics61:215–53.
40.
SchmidtManfred G.1996. “When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy.” European Journal of Political Research30:155–86.
41.
SchmittCarina. 2016. “Panel Data Analysis and Partisan Variables: How Periodization Does Influence Partisan Effects.” Journal of European Public Policy23:1442–59.
42.
SchuknechtLudgerZemanekHolger. (forthcoming). “Public Expenditures and the Risk of Social Dominance.” Public Choice.
43.
SvalerydHelenaVlachosJonas. 2009. “Political Rents in a Non-corrupt Democracy.” Journal of Public Economics93:355–72.
44.
TepeMarkusVanhuyssePieter. 2013. “Cops for Hire? The Political Economy of Police Employment in the German States.” Journal of Public Policy33:165–99.
45.
WhiteHalbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica48:817–38.
46.
ZohlnhöferReimutEnglerFabianDümigKathrin. 2018. “The Retreat of the Interventionist State in Advanced Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science48:535–62.
