I measure the returns to lobbying for US local governments in terms of federal earmarks. Because a local government’s decision to lobby may be endogenous to receiving an earmark, I instrument for lobbying with local housing prices. Since the time period of my analysis covers the Housing Crisis, I argue that the variation in housing prices over this time was largely exogenous to federal earmark distributions. The strong correlation that I find between housing price growth rates and lobbying provides evidence that local governments lobbied to buffer against impending property tax losses. I find no evidence that lobbying is associated with increased earmark awards overall. However, conditional on selection into receiving an earmark, I do find evidence that lobbying served to increase the size of earmark awards.
AlmJamesBuschmanRobert D.SjoquistDavid L.. 2011. “Rethinking Local Government Reliance on the Property Tax.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41:320–31.
3.
BallaSteven J.LawrenceEric D.MaltzmanForrestSigelmanLee. 2002. “Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork.” American Journal of Political Science46:515–25.
4.
BeckerGary S.1983. “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics98:371–400.
5.
BerryChristopher R.BurdenBarry C.HowellWilliam G.. 2010. “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending.” American Political Science Review104:783–99.
6.
BoginAlexander N.DoernerWilliam M.LarsonWilliam D.. 2018. “Local House Price Dynamics: New Indices and Stylized Facts.” Real Estate Economics47:365–98.
7.
BorckRainaldOwingsStephanie. 2003. “The Political Economy of Intergovernmental Grants.” Regional Science and Urban Economics33:139–56.
8.
BrennanGeoffreyBuchananJames M.. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytic Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CameronA. ColinTrivediPravin K.. 2001. “Essentials of Count Data Regression.” In A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, edited by BaltagiBadi H., 331–48. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10.
ChapmanJeffrey I.2008. “State and Local Fiscal Sustainability: The Challenges.” Public Administration Review68:S115–31.
11.
ChernickHowardLangleyAdamReschovskyAndrew. 2011. “The Impact of the Great Recession and the Housing Crisis on the Financing of America’s Largest Cities.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41:372–81.
12.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.. 2007. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CuellarMariano-Florantino. 2012. “Earmarking.” Harvard Journal on Legislation49:249.
14.
Dalle NogareChiaraKauderBjörn. 2017. “Term Limits for Mayors and Intergovernmental Grants: Evidence from Italian Cities.” Regional Science and Urban Economics64:1–11.
15.
DawsonJamesKleinerSam. 2015. “Curbing Lettermarks.” Yale Journal on Regulation32:201.
16.
De FigueiredoJohn M.SilvermanBrian S.. 2006. “Academic Earmarks and the Returns to Lobbying.” Journal of Law and Economics49:597–625.
17.
DoernerWilliam M.IhlanfeldtKeith R.. 2011. “House Prices and City Revenues.” Regional Science and Urban Economics4:332–42.
18.
DoyleRichard B.2011a. “Real Reform or Change for Chumps: Earmark Policy Developments, 2006–2010.” Public Administration Review71:34–44.
19.
DoyleRichard B.2011b. “The Rise and (Relative) Fall of Earmarks: Congress and Reform, 2006–2010.” Public Budgeting & Finance31:1–22.
20.
DuporBillMcCroryPeter. 2017. “A Cup Runneth Over: Fiscal Policy Spillovers from the 2009 Recovery Act.” The Economic Journal128:1476–508.
21.
EvansDiana. 2004. Greasing the Wheels. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GlaeserEdward L.GyourkoJosephSaizAlbert. 2008. “Housing Supply and Housing Bubbles.” Journal of Urban Economics64:198–217.
23.
GlaeserEdward L.GottliebJoshua D.GyourkoJoseph. 2012. “Can Cheap Credit Explain the Housing Boom?” In Housing and the Financial Crisis, edited by GlaeserEdwardSinaiTodd, 301–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
GoldChelsea Fernandez. 2015. “Note: The Case for Earmarks.” American University Working Paper.
25.
GordonSteven. 2018. “What Did the Earmark Ban Do? Evidence from Intergovernmental Grants.” Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy48:3848.
26.
GordonStevenGarenJohnClarkJ. R.. 2018. “The Growth of Government, Trust in Government, and Evidence on their Coevolution.” Journal of Economics and Finance:1–25.
HayashiFumio. 2000. Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
HelpmanElhananPerssonTorsten. 2001. “Lobbying and Legislative Bargaining.” Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy1:Article 3.
30.
HoeneChristopher W.PaganoMichael A.. 2010. Research Brief on America’s Cities. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
31.
HoytWilliam H.TomaEugenia Froedge. 1989. “State Mandates and Interest Group Lobbying.” Journal of Public Economics38:199–213.
32.
HoytWilliam H.TomaEugenia Froedge. 1993. “Lobbying Expenditures and Government Output: The NEA and Public Education.” Southern Economic Journal60:405–17.
33.
IhlanfeldtKeith R.2011. “How Do Cities and Counties Respond to Changes in their Property Tax Base?” The Review of Regional Studies41:27.
JonasJiri. 2012. “Great Recession and Fiscal Squeeze at U.S. Subnational Government Level.”
36.
KerrWilliam R.LincolnWilliam F.MishraPrachi. 2014. “The Dynamics of Firm Lobbying.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy6:343–79.
37.
KirkRobert S.MallettWilliam J.PetermanDavid R.. 2011. Transportation Spending under an Earmark Ban. Library of Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
38.
KnightBrian. 2005. “Estimating the Value of Proposal Power.” The American Economic Review95:1639–52.
39.
KruegerAnne O.1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent-seeking Society.” The American Economic Review64:291–303.
40.
LarcineseValentinoRizzoLeonzioTestaCecilia. 2006. “Allocating the U.S. Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President.” Journal of Politics68:447–56.
41.
LeeFrances E.2003. “Geographic Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives: Coalition Building and Distribution of Benefits.” American Journal of Political Science47:714–28.
42.
LevittSteven D.PoterbaJames M.. 1999. “Congressional Distributive Politics and State Economic Performance.” Public Choice99:185–216.
LutzByronMolloyRavenShanHui. 2011. “The Housing Crisis and State and Local Government Tax Revenue: Five Channels.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41:306–19.
StraussJack. 2013. “Does Housing Drive State-level Job Growth? Building Permits and Consumer Expectations Forecast a State’s Economic Activity.” Journal of Urban Economics73:77–93.
59.
WilsonDaniel J.2012. “Fiscal Spending Jobs Multipliers: Evidence from the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy4:251–82.
60.
YoungAndrew T.SobelRussell S.. 2013. “Recovery and Reinvestment Act Spending at the State Level: Keynesian Stimulus or Distributive Politics?” Public Choice155:449–68.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
