In a representative survey, German citizens are asked whether inherited wealth beyond a certain amount should be taxed. Almost 60 percent state that it should not be taxed. Building on this survey, we identify factors that predict this opposition to the taxation of inherited wealth. We find monetary self-interest, redistributive preferences, and the adherence to traditional values to matter. Women are more likely to oppose wealth transfer taxes. We account for interdependencies to other intrafamilial transfers. Subjects’ attitude toward wealth transfer taxes does not depend on their personal experience in giving long-term care. Yet subjects who expect the typical German family to reward intrafamilial caregiving through higher wealth transfers are less likely to oppose the taxation of inherited wealth. The opposite holds for subjects who expect these taxes to incentivize earlier inter vivos transfers.
AdamUrsulaMühlingTanja. 2014. Familiale Pflege. Hilfe- und Unterstützungsleistungen von Erwachsenen für ihre Eltern in quantitativen Datenquellen. Bamberg, Germany: ifb-Materialien 3-2014.
2.
BarroRobert J.1974. “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?” Journal of Political Economy82:1095–117.
3.
BernheimBert Douglas. 2002. “Taxation and Saving.” In Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 3, edited by AuerbachAlan J.FeldsteinMartin, 1174–249. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
4.
BernheimBert DouglasSeverinovSergei. 2003. “Bequests as Signals: An Explanation for the Equal Division Puzzle.” Journal of Political Economy111:733–64.
5.
BernheimBert DouglasShleiferAndreiSummersLawrence H.. 1985. “The Strategic Bequest Motive.” Journal of Political Economy93:1045–76.
6.
BirneyMaylingGraetzMichael J.ShapiroIan. 2006. “Public Opinion and the Push to Repeal the Estate Tax.” National Tax Journal59:439–61.
7.
BischoffIvoHeinemannFrierichHennighausenTanja. 2013. “What Makes Me See Inequality as Just?” Schmollers Jahrbuch/Journal of Applied Social Science Studies133:1–22.
8.
BossmannMartinKleiberChrstianWäldeKlaus. 2007. “Bequest, Taxation and the Distribution of Wealth in a General Equilibrium Model.” Journal of Public Economics91:1247–71.
9.
BrandtMartinDeindlChristianHaberkernKlausSzydlikMarc. 2009. “Geben und Nehmen zwischen Generationen: Der Austausch von Geld und Zeit in Europa.” In 50plus in Deutschland und Europa: Ergebnisse des Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, edited byBörsch-SupanAxel, 95–114. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
10.
BraunReiner. 2011. Erben in Deutschland. Wirtschaftsdienst91:724–726.
11.
BüttnerThiessSchefflerWolframSpengelChristoph. 2004. Erbschaftsteuerbelastung in Deutschland, den Staaten der EU und anderen wichtigen Staaten bei unbeschränkter und beschränkter Steuerpflicht Dienstleistungsauftrag des BMF. Mannheim, Germany: ZEW.
12.
CoallDavid A.HertwigRalph. 2010. “Grandparental Investment: Past, Present, and Future.” Behavioral and Brain Science33:1–19.
13.
CoxDonaldRankMark R.. 1992. “Inter-vivos Transfers and Intergenerational Exchange.” The Review of Economics and Statistics74:305–14.
14.
CremerHelmuthPestieauPierre. 2011 “The Tax Treatment of Intergenerational Wealth Transfers.” CESifo Economic Studies57:365–401
15.
DowdingKeith. 2008. “Why Are Inheritance Taxes Unpopular?” Political Quarterly79:179–83.
16.
EngelhardtCarinaWagenerAndreas. 2014. “Biased Perceptions of Income Inequality and Redistribution.” CESifoWorking Paper Series No. 4838. Munich, Germany: CESifo.
17.
European Union. 2012. Long-term Care of the Elderly: Provisions and Providers in 33 European Countries. Luxembourg, Europe: Publications Office of the European Union.
18.
GaleWilliam G.SlemrodJoel B.. 2001. “Rethinking the Estate and Gift Tax: Overview.” In Rethinking the Estate and Gift Taxation, edited byGaleWilliam G.SlemrodJoel B., 1–65. Washington DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
GESIS. 2016. “GESIS Panel—Standard Edition. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5665 Data File Version 17.0.0.” Mannheim, Germany: GESIS Panel Team – GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.4232/1.12709.
20.
GrossChristianeLorekKerstinRichterFriedemann. 2017. “Attitudes towards Inheritance Taxation.” The Journal of Economic Inequality15:93–112.
21.
GrossmannVolkerPoutvaaraPanu. 2009. “Pareto-improving Bequest Taxation.” International Tax and Public Finance16:647–69.
22.
HammarHenrikJagersSverker C.NordblomKatharina. 2008. “Attitudes towards Tax Levels: A Multi-tax Comparison.” Fiscal Studies29:523–43.
23.
HinesJames R.Jr. 2013. “The Redistributive Potential of Transfer Taxation.” Public Finance Review41:885–903.
24.
KaragiannakiEleni. 2015. “Recent Trends in the Size and the Distribution of Inherited Wealth in the UK.” Fiscal Studies36:181–213.
25.
KuziemkoIlyanaNortonMichael I.SaezEmmanuelStantchevaStefanie. 2013. “How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments.” NBER Working Paper 18865. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
26.
McCafferyEdward J.BaronJonathan. 2006. “Thinking about Tax.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law12:106–35.
27.
McCartyEllen F.HendricksConstance S.HendricksDenisha L.McCartyKathleen M.. 2008. “Ethical Dimensions and Filial Caregiving.” Online Journal of Health Ethics5:1–19.
PrabhakarRajiv. 2012. “What Do Public Think of Taxation? Evidence from a Focus Group Study in England.” Journal of European Social Policy22:77–89.
33.
RowlingsonKarenMcKayStephen. 2005. Attitudes to Inheritance in Britain. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
34.
SchmidtManuelaSchneeklothUlrich. 2011. Abschlussbericht zur Studie “Wirkungen des Pflege-Weiterentwicklungsgesetzes.” Bericht zu den Repräsentativerhebungen im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit. Berlin, Germany: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit Kommunikationsstab (Öffentlichkeitsarbeit).
35.
SidesJohn. 2016. “Stories or Science? Facts, Frames, and Policy Attitudes.” American Politics Research44:387–414.
36.
SlemrodJoel. 2006. “The Role of Misperceptions in Support for Regressive Tax Reform.” National Tax Journal59:57–75.
37.
SzydlikMarc. 2004. “Inheritance and Inequality: Theoretical Reasoning and Empirical Evidence.” European Sociological Review20:31–45.
38.
SzydlikMarcSchuppJürgen. 2004. “Wer erbt mehr? Erbschaften. Sozialstruktur und Alterssicherung.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie56:609–29.
39.
WiktorJohn R.2010. “Putting Family First: Intergenerational Wealth Transfer and Investment Planning.” Journal of Taxation of Investment27:69–77.
40.
WilhelmMarc O.1996. “Bequest Behavior and the Effect of Heirs’ Earnings: Testing the Altruistic Model of Bequests.” American Economic Review86:874–92.
41.
WolffEdward N.GittlemanMaury. 2014. “Inheritances and the Distribution of Wealth or Whatever Happened to the Great Inheritance Boom?” The Journal of Economic Inequality12:439–68.
42.
WredeMatthias. 2013. “Fair Inheritance Taxation in the Presence of Tax Planning.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics51:12–18.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
