This article proposes a method for integrating individual effective tax rates and marginal tax rates computed from a microsimulation (partial equilibrium) model of tax policy with a dynamic general equilibrium model of tax policy that can provide macroeconomic analysis or dynamic scores of tax reforms. Our approach captures the rich heterogeneity, realistic demographics, and tax-code detail of the microsimulation model and allows this detail to inform a general equilibrium model with a relatively high degree of heterogeneity. In addition, we propose a functional form in which tax rates depend jointly on the levels of both capital income and labor income.
BarriosSalvadorDollsMathiasMafteiAnamariaPeichlAndreasRiscadoSaraVargaJanosWittnebenChristian. 2017. “Dynamic Scoring of Tax Reforms in the European Union.” Discussion Paper No. 17-017, ZEW Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.
3.
BellFelicitie C.MillerMichael L.. 2015. “Life Tables for the United States Social Security Area 1900–2100.” Actuarial Study 120, U.S. Social Security Administration. Accessed November 23, 2018. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html.
DeBackerJasonEvansRichard W.MagnussonEvanPhillipsKerk L.RamnathShanthiSwiftIsaac. 2018. “The Distributional Effects of Redistributional Tax Policy.” Working Paper. Accessed November 23, 2018. https://sites.google.com/site/rickecon/WealthTax.pdf.
7.
De NardiMariacristina. 2004. “Wealth Inequality and Intergenerational Links.” Review of Economic Studies71:743–68.
8.
De NardiMariacristinaYangFang. 2014. “Bequests and Heterogeneity in Retirement Wealth.” European Economic Review72:182–96.
9.
De NardiMariacristinaÍmrohoroğluSelahattinSargentThomas J.. 1999. “Projected U.S. Demographics and Social Security.” Review of Economic Dynamics2:575–615.
10.
DiamondJohn W.MoomauPamela H.. 2003. “Issues in Analyzing the Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Policy.” National Tax Journal56:447–62.
11.
EvansOwen J.1983. “Tax Policy, the Interest Elasticity of Saving, and Capital Accumulation: Numerical Analysis of Theoretical Models.” American Economic Review73:398–410.
12.
EvansRichard W.PhillipsKerk L.. 2018. “Advantages of an Ellipse When Modeling Leisure Utility.” Computational Economics51:513–33.
13.
FullertonDonRogersDiane Lim. 1993. Who Bears the Lifetime Tax Burden?Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
14.
GaleWilliam G.ScholzJohn Karl. 1994. “Intergenerational Transfers and the Accumulation of Wealth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives8:145–60.
15.
GokhaleJagadeeshKotlikoffLaurence J.SeftonJamesWealeMartin. 2000. “Simulating the Transmission of Wealth Inequality via Bequests.” Journal of Public Economics79:93–128.
16.
GouveiaMiguelStraussRobert P.. 1994. “Effective Federal Individual Tax Functions: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis.” National Tax Journal47:317–39.
17.
GunerNezihKaygusuzRemziVenturaGustavo. 2014. “Income Taxation of U.S. Households: Facts and Parametric Estimates.” Review of Economic Dynamics17:559–81.
18.
GuvenenFatihKuruscuBurhanettinOzkanSerdar. 2014. “Taxation of Human Capital and Wage Inequality: A Cross-country Analysis.” Review of Economic Studies81:818–50.
19.
HeathcoteJonathanStoreslettenKjetilViolanteGiovanni L.. 2017. “Optimal Tax Progressivity: An Analytical Framework.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics132:1693–754.
20.
HolterHans A.KruegerDirkStepanchukSerhiy. 2014. “How Does Tax Progressivity and Household Heterogeneity Affect Laffer Curves?” NBER Working Paper No. 20688, National Bureau of Economic Research, Boston, MA.
21.
HurdMichael D.1989. “Mortality Risk and Bequests.” Econometrica57:779–813.
22.
KitaoSagiri. 2010. “Labor-dependent Capital Income Taxation.” Journal of Monetary Economics57:959–74.
23.
KotlikoffLaurenceSmettersKentWalliserJan. 2001. “Finding a Way Out of America’s Demographic Dilemma.” NBER Working Paper 8258, National Bureau of Economic Research, Boston, MA.
24.
KotlikoffLaurence J.SummersLawrence H. 1981. “The Role of Intergenerational Transfers in Aggregate Capital Accumulation.” Journal of Political Economy89:706–32.
25.
KruegerDirkLudwigAlexander. 2016. “On the Optimal Provision of Social Insurance: Progressive Taxation versus Education Subsidies in General Equilibrium.” Journal of Monetary Economics77:72–98.
26.
LaitnerJohn. 2001. “Secular Changes in Wealth Inequality and Inheritance.” Economic Journal111:691–721.
27.
MartinJoyce AHamiltonBrady E.OstermanMichelle J. K.CurtinSally C.MathewsT. J.. 2015. “Births: Final Data for 2013.” National Vital Statistics Reports64:1–68.
28.
MertensKarelRavnMorten O.. 2011. “Understanding the Aggregate Effects of Anticipated and Unanticipated Tax Policy Shocks.” Review of Economic Dynamics14: 27–54.
NishiyamaShinichi. 2002. “Bequests, Inter Vivos Transfers, and Wealth Distribution.” Review of Economic Dynamics5:892–931.
31.
NishiyamaShinichi. 2004. “Analyzing an Aging Population—A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach.” Technical Paper Series 2004-03, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC.
32.
NishiyamaShinichi. 2015. “Fiscal Policy Effects in a Heterogeneous-agent OLG Economy with an Aging Population.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control61:114–32.
33.
NishiyamaShinichiSmettersKent. 2007. “Does Social Security Privatization Produce Efficiency Gains?” Quarterly Journal of Economics122:1677–719.
SuzumuraKotaro. 1983. “Perron-frobenius Theorm on Non-negative Square Matrices: An Elementary Proof.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics24:137–41.
36.
VentiSteven F.WiseDavid A.. 1988. “The Cause of Wealth Dispersion at Retirement: Choice or Chance?” American Economic Review88:185–91.
37.
WolffEdward N. 2015. Inheriting Wealth in America: Future Boom or Bust?New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
ZodrowGeorge R.DiamondJohn W.. 2013. “Dynamic Overlapping Generations Computable General Equilibrium Models and the Analysis of Tax Policy: The Diamond-Zodrow Model.” In Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edited by DixonP. B.JorgensonD. W., Vol. 1A, Chapter 11, pp. 743–813. Elsevier.
