In this reply, I commented on Hannum’s (this issue) replication of Hegde and of Hegde and Mowery. I conclude that, in his eagerness to show us wrong, Hannum appears to have committed exactly the wrong that replication exercises are meant to right.
HegdeDeepak. 2009. “Political Influence Behind the Veil of Peer Review: An Analysis of Public Biomedical Research Funding in the U.S.” Journal of Law and Economics52 (4): 665–90.
2.
HegdeDeepakMoweryDavid. 2008a. “Politics and Funding in the US Public Biomedical R&D System.” Science322 (5909): 1797–98.
3.
HegdeDeepakMoweryDavid. 2008b. Supporting Online Material for Politics and Funding in the US Public Biomedical R&D System.
