Abstract
Nearly all comparisons of ad valorem and unit taxes follow Suits and Musgrave in demonstrating the welfare dominance of ad valorem taxes. We study unit and ad valorem taxes in a monopolistic competition model where, as is the normal case, consumers have increasing preferences for variety. We show that introducing more unit taxation and less ad valorem taxation can increase consumer welfare and the tax revenue when consumers’ utility depends on both quantity and variety. To understand this, notice that more unit taxation, under a price-neutral criterion, increases tax revenue. That is, aggregate output increases after the tax change. On the other hand, we show that aggregate output goes up because variety goes up, which explains that decreased product variety cannot offset the favorable change in aggregate output.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
