This article investigates the impact of geographically targeted Federal tax relief enacted after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The relief included provisions to replace lost income, mitigate uninsured losses, and stimulate business activity. Using propensity score and Mahalanobis metric (MM) matching methods, we develop difference-in-differences (DD) estimates of the impacts of these tax incentives on income and employment growth in the Gulf Opportunity Zone. Results show that per capita personal income, including earnings, increased more rapidly in counties treated with the tax provisions than in similar untreated counties, though the results only apply to counties with minimal damage. We do not find strong evidence of impacts on employment or population growth.
AbadieAlbertoDrukkerDavidHerrJane LeberImbensGuido. 2004. “Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata.” Stata Journal4:290–311.
2.
CaliendoMarcaKopeinigSabine. 2005. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1588, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.
3.
HamersmaSarah. 2008. “The Effect of an Employer Subsidy on Employment Outcomes: A Study of the Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work Tax Credits.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management27:498–520.
4.
HansonAndrew. 2009. “Local Employment, Poverty, and Property Value Effects of Geographically-targeted Tax Incentives: An Instrumental Variables Approach.” Regional Science and Urban Economics39:721–31.
5.
HouseChristopher L.ShapiroMatthew D.. 2008. “Temporary Investment in Tax Incentives: Theory with Evidence from Bonus Depreciation.” American Economic Review98:737–68.
6.
IRS (Internal Revenue Service). 2006. Information for Taxpayers Affected by Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. Publication 4492 (January). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.
7.
IssermanAndrewRephannTerrence. 1995. “The Economic Effects of the Appalachian Regional Commission: an Empirical Assessment of 26 Years of Regional Development Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association61:345–64.
8.
KnittleMatthew. 2007. “Corporate Response to Accelerated Tax Depreciation: Bonus Depreciation for Tax Years 2002-2004.” OTA Working Paper 98 (May), U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Tax Policy, Washington, DC.
9.
KrupkaDouglas J.NoonanDouglas S.. 2009. “Empowerment Zones, Neighborhood Change, and Owner-occupied Housing.” Regional Science and Urban Economics39:386–96.
10.
MarplesDonald J.2007. The New Markets Tax Credit: An Introduction. CRS Report RS22680. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.
11.
NeumarkDavidKolkoJed. 2010. “Do Enterprise Zones Create Jobs? Evidence from California’s Enterprise Zone Program.” Journal of Urban Economics68:1–19.
12.
PenderJohnReederRichard. 2011. “Impacts of Regional Approaches to Rural Development: Initial Evidence on the Delta Regional Authority.” Economic Research Report, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
13.
PetersAlan H.FisherPeter S.. 2002. State Enterprise Zones: Have They Worked?Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.
14.
RavallionMartin. 2008. “Evaluating Anti-poverty Programs.” In Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 4, edited by EvensonR.SchultzT., 3787–846. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
15.
RichardsonJames A.2006. “Katrina/Rita: The Ultimate Test for Tax Policy?” National Tax Journal59:551–60.
16.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika70:41–55.
17.
SingerAudreyFreyWilliam H.. 2006. Katrina and Rita Impacts on Gulf Coast Populations: First Census Findings. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution.
18.
SmithJeffrey A.ToddPetra E.. 2005. “Does Matching Overcome LaLonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?” Journal of Econometrics125:305–53.
19.
StenbergPeterMorehartMitchVogelStephenCromartieJohnBrenemanVincentBrownD.. 2009. “Broadband Internet’s Value for Rural America.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report Number ERR-78, August, 2009. Accessed June 1, 2014. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err78/.
US Department of Commerce. 2008. Billion Dollar U.S. Weather Disasters, 1980-2008. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center. Accessed September 1, 2014. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/reports/billionz.html.
22.
ZhaoZhong. 2004. “Using Matching to Estimate Treatment Effects: Data Requirements, Matching Metrics, and Monte Carlo Evidence.” Review of Economics and Statistics86:91–107.
