The estimation of foreclosure spillover effects has been the subject of a number of studies following the most recent housing market crash. An important issue largely overlooked by these studies is the extent to which these spillovers vary across neighborhoods. In this article, we use data from the South Florida metropolitan area to study the variance in these foreclosure spillovers across neighborhoods with different income levels and racial concentrations. We find that the largest foreclosure spillovers occur in higher-income neighborhoods. In low-income, minority neighborhoods, we find no evidence of spillover effects. The results have important implications for local governments.
ApgarWilliamDudaMark. 2005. Collateral Damage: The Municipal Impact of Today’s Mortgage Foreclosure Boom. Minneapolis, MN: Homeownership Preservation Foundation.
2.
ArnioAshley N.BaumerEric P.WolffKevin T.. 2012. “The Contemporary Foreclosure Crisis and U.S. Crime Rates.” Social Science Research41:1598–614.
3.
BoehmThomas P.IhlanfeldtKeith R.. 1991. “The Revelation of Neighborhood Preferences: An N-chotomous Multivariate Probit Approach.” Journal of Housing Economics1:33–59.
4.
CampbellJohn Y.GiglioStefanoPathakParag. 2011. “Forced Sales and House Prices.” The American Economic Review101:2108–131.
5.
CuiLin. 2011. “Foreclosure, Vacancy and Crime.” Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
6.
CullenJulie BerryLevittSteven D.. 1999. “Crime, Urban Flight, and the Consequences for Cities.” The Review of Economics and Statistics81:159–69.
7.
EllenIngrid GouldLacoeJohannaSharyginClaudia Ayanna. 2013. “Do Foreclosures Cause Crime?” Journal of Urban Economics74:59–70.
8.
EllenIngridMadarJosiahWeselcouchMary. 2012. “What's Really Happening to the REO Stock? An Analysis of Three Cities New York, Atlanta, and Miami.” Working Paper. Furman Center, New York University, New York.
9.
FrameW. Scott. 2010. “Estimating the Effect of Mortgage Foreclosures on Nearby Property Values: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Survey Paper, Atlanta, GA.
10.
GerardiKristopherRosenblattEricWillenPaul S.YaoVincent. 2012. “Foreclosure Externalities: Some New Evidence.” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper Series. Accesed July 10, 2013http://www.brbatlanta.org/pubs/wp/12_11.cfm
11.
GoodsteinRyanLeeYan. 2010. “Do Foreclosures Increase Crime?” Working Paper. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, D.C.
12.
HardingJohn P.RosenblattEricYaoVincent W.. 2009. “The Contagion Effect of Foreclosed Properties.” Journal of Urban Economics66:164–78.
13.
IhlanfeldtKeithMayockTom. 2010. “Crime and Housing Prices.” In Handbook on the Economics of Crime, edited by BensonBruce L.ZimmermanPaul R., 303–27. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
14.
IhlanfeldtKeithMayockTom. 2012. “Foreclosures, Crime, and Housing Values: Towards a better Understanding of the Contagion Effect.” Unpublished Manuscript.
15.
IhlanfeldtKeithMayockTom. 2014. “Foreclosures and Local Government Budgets.” Working Paper. Devoe Moore Center, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
16.
IhlanfeldtKeith R.SjoquistDavid L.. 1998. “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: A Review of Recent Studies and Their Implications for Welfare Reform.” Housing Policy Debate9:849–92.
17.
ImmergluckDanSmithGoeff. 2006a. “The External Costs of Foreclosure: The Impact of Single-family Mortgage Foreclosures on Property Values.” Housing Policy Debate17:57–79.
18.
ImmergluckDanSmithGoeff. 2006b. “The Impact of Single-family Mortgage Foreclosures on Neighborhood Crime.” Housing Studies21:851–66.
19.
LeonardTammyMurdochJames. 2009. “The Neighborhood Effects of Foreclosure.” Journal of Geographical Systems11:317–32.
20.
LinZhenguoRosenblattEricYaoVincent. 2009. “Spillover Effects of Foreclosures on Neighborhood Property Values.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics38:387–407.
21.
MikelbankBrian A.2008. “Spatial Analysis of the Impact of Vacant, Abandoned, and Foreclosed Properties.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Office of Community Affairs Working Paper, Cleveland, OH.
22.
NFHA (National Fair Housing Alliance). 2012. The Banks Are Back—Our Neighborhoods Are Not: Discrimination in the Maintenance and Marketing of REO Properties. Washington, DC: National Fair Housing Alliance.
RogersWilliam H.WinterWilliam. 2009. “The Impact of Foreclosures on Neighboring Housing Sales.” Journal of Real Estate Research31:455–79.
25.
SchuetzJennyBeenVickiEllenIngrid Gould. 2008. “Neighborhood Effects of Concentrated Mortgage Foreclosures.” Journal of Housing Economics17:306–19.
26.
TitaGeorge E.PetrasTricia L.GreenbaumRobert T.. 2006. “Crime and Residential Choice: A Neighborhood Level Analysis of the Impact of Crime on Housing Prices.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology22:299–317.
