This article examines the relationship between federal transfers and fiscal deficits in India. The current system of transfers has been criticized on the grounds that it distorts the incentives for states to promote fiscal discipline. We analyze the relationship between transfers, state domestic product, and fiscal deficit for a panel of states during the period 1990 to 2010. The article finds a positive long-run relationship and bidirectional causality between primary/gross fiscal deficits and non-plan transfers. Further, there is a negative long-run relationship and one-way causality from state domestic product to transfers. These results are confirmed by multivariate cointegration analysis, which finds a long-run relationship between fiscal transfers, state product per capita, and state primary deficit. The evidence in the article is consistent with the system of fiscal transfers being “gap filling.”
AlessandriniMicheleBuccellatoTullioScaramozzinoPasquale. 2008. “Whither the Indian Federation? Regional Disparities and Economic Reforms.”Rivista Italiana degli Economisti13:367–99.
2.
AlessandriniMicheleFattouhBassamFerrariniBennoScaramozzinoPasquale. 2011. “Tariff Liberalization and Trade Specialization: Lessons from India.”Journal of Comparative Economics39:499–513.
3.
AroraBalveer. 2010. “Republic of India.” In Diversity and Unity in Federal Countries, edited by MorenoLuisColinoCesar, 200–26. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
4.
ArulampalamWijiDasguptaSugatoDhillonAmritaDuttaBhaskar. 2009. “Electoral Goals and Center-state Transfers: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence from India.”Journal of Development Economics88:103–19.
5.
BagchiAmaresh. 2003. “Fifty Years of Fiscal Federalism in India. An Appraisal.” Kale Memorial Lecture at Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune.
6.
BajpaiNirupamSachsJeffrey D.. 1999. “The State of State Government Finances in India.”Development discussion paper no. 719. September: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7.
BandyopadhyaySangamitra. 2012. “Convergence Club Empirics: Evidence from Indian States.”Research in Economic Inequality20: 175–203.
8.
BhattacharyyaB. B.SakthivelSachidanandam. 2004. “Regional Growth and Disparity in India: Comparison of Pre-and Post Reform Decades.”Economic and Political Weekly39:1071–77.
9.
BoadwayRobinShahAnwar. 2007. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.
10.
BreitungJörg. 2000. “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data.” In Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Advances in Econometrics, vol. 15, edited by BaltagiBadi, 161–178. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: JAI.
11.
Central Statistical Organization. 2010. Statistical Yearbook. Government of India.
12.
DasguptaSugatoDhillonAmritaDuttaBhaskar. 2001. “Electoral Goals and Centre-state Transfers in India”. Working Paper, Indian Statistical Institute, New Dehli.
13.
DenisonE.1985. Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929-1982. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14.
DiewertW. ErwinFoxKevin J.. 2005. “The New Economy and an Old Problem: Net versus Gross Output”. CAER Working Paper 2005/02, Faculty of Commerce and Economics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney.
15.
FischerStanley. 1993. “The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth.”Journal of Monetary Economics32:485–512.
16.
GeorgeKumar Krishna. 2010. “Liberalization for the Economy and Controls for the States.”Paper presented at Twenty Years of Fiscal Federalism in India, CDS national conference on the Indian economy, December 1–3.
17.
HadriKaddour. 2000. “Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data.”Econometrics Journal3:148–61.
18.
HerdRichardLeibfritzWilli. 2008. “Fiscal Policy in India: Past Reforms and Future Challenges.”Working Paper No. 595, OECD Economics Department, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
19.
HultenC. R.1992. “Accounting for the Wealth of Nations: The Net versus Gross Output Controversy and its Ramifications.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics94:9–24.
20.
ImKyung SoHashem PesaranM.ShinYongcheol. 2003. “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels.”Journal of Econometrics115:53–74.
21.
KaoChihwa. 1999. “Spurious Regression and Residual-based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data.”Journal of Econometrics90:1–44.
22.
KremersJeroenEricssonNeilDodadoJuan J.. 1992. “The Power of Cointegration Tests.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics54:325–48.
23.
LevinAndrewLinChien FuChuChia Shang. 2002. “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties.”Journal of Econometrics108:1–24.
24.
McCartenWilliam J.2001. “The Challenge of Fiscal Discipline in the Indian States.” In Decentralization and Hard Budget Constraints, edited by RoddenJonathanEskelandGunnarLitvackJennie, 249–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Ministry of Finance. Various Issues. Economic Survey. New Delhi, India: Government of India.
26.
NagarajRayaproluVaroudakisAristomèneVèganonèsMarie Ange. 1998. “Long-run Growth Trends and Convergence across Indian States.” Working Paper No. 131, OECD Development Centre, Paris.
27.
PedroniPeter. 1999. “Critical Values for Cointegrating Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics61:653–70.
28.
PedroniPeter. 2004. “Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis.”Econometric Theory20:597–625.
29.
PersynDamiaanWesterlundJoakim. 2008. “Error-correction Based Cointegration Tests for Panel Data.”The Stata Journal8:232–41.
30.
PurfieldCatriona. 2006. “Mind the Gap – Is Economic Growth in India Leaving Some States Behind?”IMF Working Paper WP/06/103, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
31.
RamalingomR.KurupK. N.. 1991. “Plan Transfers to States. Revised Gadgil Formula: An Analysis.”Economic and Political Weekly26:501–6.
32.
RaoGovinda. 1998. “India: Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in a Planned Economy.” In Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries, edited by BirdRichard M.VaillancourtFrancois, 78–114. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33.
RaoGovinda. 2000. Fiscal Decentralization in Indian Federalism. Bangalore, India: Institute for Social and Economic Change.
34.
RaoGovinda. 2005. Changing Contours in Fiscal Federalism in India. New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
35.
RaoGovinda. 2007. “Fiscal Adjustment: Rhetoric and Reality.”Economic and Political Weekly42 (14): 1252–57.
36.
RaoM. GovindaSinghNirvikar. 2002. “The Political Economy of Center-state Fiscal Transfers in India.” In Institutional Elements of Tax Design and Reform, edited by McLarenJohn, 69–123. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37.
Reserve Bank of India. Various issues. Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economy and State Finances. Mumbai: RBI.
38.
THFC (Thirteenth Finance Commission). 2010. Report of the Thirteenth Finance Commission (2010-2015). New Delhi: Government of India.
39.
WesterlundJoakim. 2007. “Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics69:709–48.
