Trade-offs between economic efficiency, growth, and distributional equity permeate economics, including discussions of tax policy and tax reform. Computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling is one tool that is often used to estimate the magnitudes of the variables that determine the efficiency, growth, and equity properties of alternative tax reforms. In this article, we report the results of simulations of a CGE model that examines the economic and distributional effects of the enactment in the United States of a temporary value-added tax used to reduce the level of the national debt. The results suggest that such a reform is generally moderately progressive both for cohorts alive at the time of reform and for future generations, at least within the context of lifetime measures of tax burden, and that current middle-aged and elderly generations must bear a burden to confer a gain, relative to the status quo, on younger and future generations.
AltigDavidAuerbachAlan J.KotlikoffLaurence J.SmettersKent A.WalliserJan. 2001. “Simulating Fundamental Tax Reform in the United States.”American Economic Review91:574–95.
2.
AuerbachAlan J.2008. “Tax Reform in the 21st Century.” In Fundamental Tax Reform: Issues, Choices and Implications, edited by DiamondJohn W.ZodrowGeorge R., 27–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
AuerbachAlan J.GaleWilliam G.. 2011. “(Still) Tempting Fate: The Latest Federal Budget Outlook.”Working Paper, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
BanksJamesDiamondPeter A.. 2010. “The Base for Direct Taxation.” In Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, edited by MirrleesJames A.AdamStuartBesleyTimothyBlundellRichardBondStephenChoteRobertGammieMalcolmJohnsonPaulMylesGarethPoterbaJames, 548–674. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BengeMattPallotMarieSlackHamish. 2013. “Possible Lessons for the United States from New Zealand’s GST.”National Tax Journal66:479–98.
7.
Bipartisan Policy Center. 2010. Restoring America’s Future: Reviving the Economy, Cutting Spending and Debt, and Creating a Simple, Pro-growth Tax System. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center.
8.
BirdRichard M.GendronPierre-Pascal. 2007. The VAT in Developing and Transitional Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BradfordDavid F.1986. Untangling the Income Tax. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BradfordDavid F.2005. “A Tax System for the Twenty-first Century.” In Toward Fundamental Tax Reform, edited by AuerbachAlan J.HassettKevin A., 81–94. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
CarrollRobert J.ClineRobert J.DiamondJohn W.NeubigThomas S.ZodrowGeorge R.. 2010. The Macroeconomic Effects of an Add-on Value-added Tax. Prepared for the National Retail Federation. Washington, DC: Ernst & Young LLP.
13.
CBO (Congressional Budget Office). 2013. The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2013–2023. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
14.
ChirinkoRobert. 1993. “Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications.”Journal of Economic Literature31:1875–911.
15.
ChirinkoRobert S.FazzariSteven M.MeyerAndrew P.. 2004. “That Elusive Elasticity: A Long-Panel Approach to Estimating the Capital-Labor Substitution Elasticity.”CESifo Working Paper Series 1240, CESifo Group, Munich, Germany.
Council of Economic Advisers. 2010. Economic Report of the President, 2010. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
18.
DiamondJohn W.ZodrowGeorge R.. 2006. “Reflections on the Use of Life-cycle Computable General Equilibrium Models in Analyzing the Effects of Tax Reform.”NTA Network, National Tax Association(April): 3–4.
19.
DiamondJohn W.ZodrowGeorge R.. 2007. “Economic Effects of a Personal Capital Income Tax Add-on to a Consumption Tax.”FinanzArchiv63:374–95.
20.
DiamondJohn W.ZodrowGeorge R.. 2008. “Consumption Tax Reform: Changes in Business Equity and Housing Prices.” In Fundamental Tax Reform: Issues, Choices and Implications, edited by DiamondJohn W.ZodrowGeorge R., 227–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
DiamondPeter A.SaezEmmanuel. 2011. “The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations.”Journal of Economic Perspectives25:165–90.
22.
FehrHansJokischSabineKallweitManuelKindermannFabianKotlikoffLaurence J.. 2013. “Generational Policy and Aging in Closed and Open Dynamic General Equilibrium Models.” In Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, vol. 1b, edited by DixonPeter B.JorgensonDale W., 1719–802. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
23.
FeldsteinMartinHoriokaCharles. 1980. “Domestic Savings and International Capital Flows.”Economic Journal90:314–29.
24.
FullertonDonRogersDiane Lim. 1993. Who Bears the Lifetime Tax Burden?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
25.
FullertonDonRogersDiane Lim. 1996. “Lifetime Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform.” In Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform, edited by AaronHenry J.GaleWilliam G., 321–54. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
GaleWilliam G.HarrisBenjamin H.. 2011. “A VAT for the United States: Part of the Solution.” In The VAT Reader: What a Federal Consumption Tax would Mean for America, 64–82. Arlington, VA: Tax Analysts.
27.
GillisMalcolmMieszkowskiPeterZodrowGeorge R.. 1996. “Indirect Consumption Taxes: Common Issues and Differences among the Alternative Approaches.”Tax Law Review51:725–74.
28.
GravelleJane G.2002. “Behavioral Responses to a Consumption Tax.” In United States Tax Reform in the 21st Century, edited by ZodrowGeorge R.MieszkowskiPeter, 25–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GravelleJane G.2006. “Feasible but Hard-to-believe Models: Computable General Equilibrium Intertemporal Models.”NTA Network, National Tax Association(January): 3–4.
30.
GravelleJane G.SmettersKent A.. 2006. “Does the Open Economy Assumption Really Mean that Labor Bears the Burden of a Capital Income Tax?”Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy6:Article 3.
31.
GunningTimothy S.DiamondJohn W.ZodrowGeorge R.. 2008. “Selecting Parameter Values for General Equilibrium Model Simulations.” In Proceedings of the One Hundredth Annual Conference on Taxation, 43–49. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
32.
HallRobert E.2004. “Measuring Factor Adjustment Costs.”Quarterly Journal of Economics119:899–927.
33.
HayashiFumio. 1982. “Tobin’s Marginal Q and Average Q: A Neoclassical Interpretation.”Econometrica50:213–24.
34.
JohanssonAsaHeadyChristopherArnoldJensBrysBertVartiaLaura. 2008. “Taxation and Economic Growth.”OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 620, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
35.
KocherlakotaNarayana R.2010. The New Dynamic Public Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
KopczukWojciechLuptonJoseph. 2007. “To Leave or not to Leave: The Distribution of Bequest Motives.”Review of Economic Studies74:206–35.
37.
MankiwN. GregoryWeinzierlMatthew C.YaganDanny. 2009. “Optimal Taxation in Theory and Practice.”Journal of Economic Perspectives23:147–74.
38.
McLureCharles E.Jr.1987. The Value Added Tax: Key to Deficit Reduction?Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
39.
National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. 2010. The Moment of Truth. Washington, DC: National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.
40.
President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform. 2005. Simple, Fair, and Pro-growth: Proposals to Fix America’s Tax System. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
41.
RingRaymond J.Jr.1999. “Consumers’ Share and Producers’ Share of the General Sales Tax.”. National Tax Journal52:79–90.
42.
SummersLawrence H.1981. “Capital Taxation and Accumulation in a Life Cycle Growth Model.”American Economic Review71:533–44.
43.
TobinJames. 1969. “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking1:15–29.
44.
ToderEricRosenbergJoseph. 2010. Effects of Imposing a Value-added Tax to Replace Payroll Taxes or Corporate Taxes. Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center, Urban Institute, and Brookings Institution.
45.
ZodrowGeorge R.2002. “Transitional Issues in the Implementation of a Flat Tax or a National Retail Sales Tax.” In United States Tax Reform in the 21st Century, edited by ZodrowGeorge R.MieszkowskiPeter, 245–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
ZodrowGeorge R.2007. “Should Capital Income be Subject to Consumption-based Taxation?” In Taxing Capital Income, edited by AaronHenry J.BurmanLeonard E.SteuerleEugene C., 49–81. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
47.
ZodrowGeorge R.2010. “Capital Mobility and Capital Tax Competition.”National Tax Journal63:865–901.
48.
ZodrowGeorge R.DiamondJohn W.. 2013. “Dynamic Overlapping Generations CGE Models and the Analysis of Tax Policy: The Diamond-Zodrow Model.” In Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edited by DixonPeter B.JorgensonDale W., 743–813. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
49.
ZodrowGeorge R.NeubigThomas S.DiamondJohn W.ClineRobert J.CarrollRobert J.. 2011. “Price Effects of Implementing a VAT in the United States.” In Proceedings of the One Hundred and Third Annual Conference on Taxation, 56–63. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
