Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the influence of federal grants on nonprofit expenditure decisions. The topic is of particular concern for governments who wish to stimulate private provision of public services. Recent research shows that grants may inadvertently reduce private sector provision by causing a reduction in fund-raising effort. This study extends line of inquiry by examining the influence of conditional versus lump-sum-style grants. The article draws detailed grant data from the Federal Assistance Award Data System (FAADS), which includes structural characteristics of the grant. FAADS grant information is combined with a panel of nonprofit financial data. Empirical results demonstrate that, though relatively uncommon in the data, conditional grants are particularly effective at stimulating both additional fund-raising activity and output of the firm. Block-Formula grants appear to significantly reduce both fund-raising and output decisions. The study implies that the use of conditional grants could mitigate crowd-out due to nonprofit management decisions.

Keywords

nonprofits grants flypaper incentives

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreoni

James

. 1988. “Privately Provided Public Goods in a Large Economy: The Limits of Altruism.” Journal of Public Economics 35:57–73.

Andreoni

James

. 1989. “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Riardian Equivalence.” Journal of Political Economy 97:1447–58.

Andreoni

James

Payne

Abigail

. 2003. “Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd out Giving or Fundraising.” American Economic Review 93:792–812.

Andreoni

James

Payne

Abigail

. 2010. “Is Crowding Out Due Entirely to Fundraising? Evidence from a Panel of Charities.” Journal of Public Economics 95:334–43.

Bergstrom

Theodore

Blume

Lawrence

Varian

Hal

. 1986. “On the Private Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 29:25–49.

Center on Philanthropy. 2007. Giving USA 2007. Giving USA Foundation, researched and written by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

Duncan

Brian

. 1999. “Modeling Charitable Contributions of Time and Money.” Journal of Public Economics 72:213–42.

Evans

William

Owens

Emily

. 2007. “COPS and Crime.” Journal of Pubic Economics 91:181–201.

Gittell

Ross

Tebaldi

Edinaldo

. 2006. “Charitable Giving; Factors Influencing Giving in U.S. States.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35:721–36.

10.

Hines

James

Thaler

Richard

. 1995. “The Flypaper Effect.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9:217–26.

11.

Honoré

B. E.

1992. Trimmed Lad and Least Squares Estimation of Truncated and Censored Regression Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 60(3): 533–65.

12.

Hughes

Patricia

Luksetich

William

. 1999. “The Relationship among Funding Sources for Art and History Museums.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10:21–37.

13.

Khanna

Jyoti

Posnett

John

Sandler

Todd

. 1995. “Charity Donations in the U.K.: New Evidence based on Panel Data.” Journal of Public Economics 56:257–72.

14.

Knight

Brian

. 2002. “Endogenous Federal Grants and Crowd-out of State Government Spending: Theory and Evidence from the Federal Highway Aid Program.” American Economic Review 92 :71–92.

15.

Poi

Brian

. 2006. “Jacknife Instrumental Variables Estimation in Stata.” The Stata Journal, 364–76.

16.

Posnett

John

Sandler

Todd

. 1989. “Demand for Charity Donations in Private Nonprofit Markets.” Journal of Public Economics 40:187–200.

17.

Powell

Walter

Steinberg

Richard

, eds. 2006. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

18.

Simmons

Walter

Rosemarie

Emanuele

. 2004. “Does Government Spending Crowd out Donation of Time and Money?” Public Finance Review 32:498–511.

19.

Staiger

Douglas

Stock

James

. 1997. “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.” Econometrica 65:557–86.

20.

Stock

James

Yogo

Motohiro

. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by Andrews

Stock

, 80–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Thornton

Jeremy

Belski

William

. 2009. “Financial Reporting Quality and Price Competition among Nonprofit Firms.” Applied Economics, Advanced Access May, 1–15.

22.

Tinkelman

Daniel

. 2010. “Revenue Interactions: Crowding out, Crowding in, or Neither?” In Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management, edited by Seaman

Young

, 18–41. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

23.

Tinkelman

Daniel

Neely

Daniel

. 2011. “Some Econometric Issues in Studying Nonprofit Revenue Interactions using NCCS Data.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40:751–61.

24.

US Government Accountability Office. 2009. Nonprofit Sector: Significant Federal Funds Reach the Sector through Various Mechanisms, but More Complete and Reliable Funding Data are Needed. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.

25.

Urban Institute; Center on Philanthropy, Indiana University. 2004. The Quality of Financial Reporting by Nonprofits Findings and Implications. Accessed on July 29, 2011. http://nccsdataweb.urban.org.

Flypaper Nonprofits

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References