Should the Federal Government Reallocate Funds within Federal Transfers?

Abstract

It is recognized that one of the goals of federal transfers is to provide the states with some financial leverage during recessions. Federal transfers in the United States comprise such components as retirement and disability payments for individuals, other direct payments for individuals or organizations, grants, procurement contracts, and salaries and wages. Is the composition of the federal transfers’ budget having an optimal effect on the business cycle or should the federal government reallocate some expenditure? In this article, we argue that the federal government may improve its role in stabilizing the business cycle if some reallocation is made from procurement contracts and payments for other than individuals to direct payments for individuals, grants, and disability and retirement payments.

Keywords

components of federal transfers business cycles panel data GMM

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arellano, Manuel , and Stephen Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58:277-97.

Asdrubali, Pierfederico , Bent E. Sorensen , and Oved Yosha. 1996. Channels of interstate risk sharing: United States 1963-1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111:1081-110.

Bayoumi, Tamin , and Paul Manson. 2000. Fiscal flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for monetary union in Europe. European Economic Review 39:255-74.

Bowsher, Clive. 2002. On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Economics Letters 77:211-20.

Cashin, Paul , and Ratna Sahay. 1995. Internal migration, center-state grants, and economic growth in the states of India. International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 66.

Chernick, Howard , and Paul Sturm. 2004. Redistribution at state and local level: Consequences for economic growth. In Proceedings of the annual conference on taxation 2004, 190-201.

Garofalo, Gasper , and Steven Yamarik. 2002. Regional convergence: Evidence from a new state-by-state capital stock series. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84:316-23.

Holtz-Eakin, Douglas , and Amy Schwartz . 1995. Spatial productivity spillovers from public infrastructure: Evidence from state highways. International Tax and Public Finance 2:459-68.

Kaufman, Martin , Phillip Swagel , and Steven Dunaway. 1997. Regional convergence and the role of federal transfers in Canada. International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 3.

10.

Obstfeld, Maurice , and Giovanni Peri. 1998. Regional non-adjustment and fiscal policy . Economic Policy 26:207-59.

11.

Sala-i-Martin, Xavier , and Jeffrey Sachs. 1992. Fiscal federalism and optimum currency areas: Evidence for Europe from the United States. In Establishing a central bank: Issues in Europe and lessons from the U.S., ed. M. B. Canzoneri , V. Grilli , and P. R. Masson. Cambridge University Press.