Skeptics of fiscal decentralization argue that it can complicate fiscal stabilization policies at the level of the central government because of uncoordinated fiscal actions by the national and sub-national tiers of government. However, panel data estimates for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development economies suggest that this danger has been overstated in that changes in the fiscal balances of central and sub-national governments are highly positively correlated. This result partly reflects the success of institutional arrangements that govern intergovernmental fiscal relations and appears unrelated to the extent of fiscal decentralization.
Darby, Julia, V. Anton Muscatelli, and Graeme Roy.2004. Fiscal federalism, fiscal consolidations and cuts in central government grants: Evidence from an event study. Center for Economic Studies working paper, Munich, Germany.
2.
———. 2005. Fiscal consolidation and decentralization: A tale of two tiers. Fiscal Studies26 (2): 169-95.
3.
de Mello Luiz , R., Jr.1999. Intergovernmental fiscal relations: Coordination failures and fiscal outcomes. Public Budgeting and Finance19 (1): 3-25.
4.
———. 2000. Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: A cross country analysis. World Development28 (2): 365-80.
5.
Fornasari, Francesca, Steven Webb, and Heng-Fu Zou.2000. The macroeconomic impact of decentralized spending and deficits: International evidence. Annals of Economics and Finance9 (1): 404-33.
6.
Fukasaku, Kiichiro, and Luiz R. de Mello Jr.1998. Fiscal decentralization and macroeconomic stability: The experience of large developing and transition economies. In Democracy, decentralization and deficits in Latin America, ed. Kiichiro Fukasaku and Ricardo Hausmann, 121-48. Washington, DC: IADB and OECD.
7.
Gali, Jordi.1994. Government size and macroeconomic stability. European Economic Review38 (1): 117-32.
8.
Giavazzi, Francesco, Tullio Jappelli, and Marco Pagano.2000. Searching for non-linear effects of fiscal policy: Evidence from industrial and developing countries. European Economic Review44 (7): 1259-89.
9.
Hausmann, J.A.1979. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica46 (6): 1251-71.
10.
Joumard, Isabelle, and Per Mathis Kongsrud .2003. Fiscal relations across government levels. OECD Economic Studies36 (1): 155-228.
11.
Lane, Philip R.2003a. Business cycles and macroeconomic policy in emerging market economies. International Finance6 (1): 89-108.
12.
———. 2003b. The cyclical behavior of fiscal policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics87 (12): 2661-75.
13.
Musgrave, Richard.1959. The theory of public finance. New York : McGraw-Hill.
14.
Neyapti, Bilin.2003. Fiscal decentralization and deficits: International evidenceTurkish Economic Association discussion paper. http://www.tek.org.tr.
15.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).1999. Taxing powers of state and local governmentTax Policy Studies no. 1. Paris: OECD.
16.
Perotti, Roberto.1999. Fiscal policy in good times and bad. Quarterly Journal of Economics114 (4): 1399-1436.
17.
Prud'homme, Remy.1995. On the dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer10 (2): 210-26.
18.
Rodden, Jonathan.2002. The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science46 (3): 670-87.
19.
Shome, Parthasarthi. 2002 . India's fiscal matters. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
20.
Stein, Ernesto.1999. Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America . Journal of Applied Economics2 (2): 357-91.
21.
Sturzenegger, Federico, and Rogerio Werneck.2006. Fiscal federalism and procyclical spending: The cases of Argentina and Brazil. Revista Económica51 (1/2): 151-94.
22.
Tanzi, Vito.1995. Fiscal federalism and decentralization: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects. In Annual World Bank conference on development economics, ed. Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic, 295-316. Washington, DC: World Bank.
23.
Ter-Minassian, Teresa.1997. Intergovernmental fiscal relations in a macroeconomic perspective: An overview. In Fiscal federalism in theory and practice, ed. Teresa Ter-Minassian, 3-24. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
24.
———. 1999. Decentralization and macroeconomic management. In Fiscal decentralization in emerging economies: Governance issues , ed. Luiz R. de Mello Jr. and Kiichiro Fukasaku, 55-65. Paris: OECD Development Center.
25.
Thornton, John.2007a. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered . Journal of Urban Economics61 (1): 64-70.
26.
———. 2007b. Further evidence on revenue decentralization and inflation . Economics Letters95 (1): 140-45.
27.
Von Hagen, Jurgen, Andrew Hughes Hallett, and Rolf Strauch.2002. Budgetary consolidation in Europe: Quality, economic conditions, and persistence. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies16 (4): 512-35.
28.
Wibbels, Erik.2000. Federalism and the politics of macroeconomic policy and performance. American Journal of Political Science44 (4): 687-702.
29.
Wibbels, Erik, and Jonathan Rodden .2005. Fiscal decentralization and the business cycle: An empirical study of eight federationsMimeo. http://web.mit.edu/jrodden/www./papers.html .
