This article presents estimates of the effect of private school competition on public school performance. Using data on school districts in Georgia, the authors estimate models relating tenth- and third-grade test scores for either reading or mathematics to the level of private school competition. Test scores are not measurably or significantly higher in areas with greater private school competition, a result robust through multiple estimations using three measures of private school competition and a variety of control variables. The authors address the possible endogeneity between test scores and private school competition using instrumental variables estimators, with percentage of the population that is Catholic, county population in 1980, lagged competition, and various other measures as alternative instruments.
Arum, Richard. 1996. Do private schools force public schools to compete?American Sociological Review61:29-46.
2.
Belfield, Clive R., and Henry M. Levin. 2001. The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: A review for the United States. Review of Educational Research71 (2): 279-341.
3.
Campbell, David E.2001. Making democratic education work: School, social capital, and civic education. Education Next, www.educationnext.edu/unabridged/20013/campbell.html.
4.
Chambers, Jay G.1995. Public school teacher cost differences across the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
5.
Chubb, John E., and Terry M. Moe. 1990. Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
Cohn, Elchanan, and Terry Geske. 1990. The economics of education. New York: Pergamon.
7.
Coleman, James S., Thomas Hoffer, and Sally Kilgore. 1982. High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and private schools compared. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Couch, Jim F., William F. Shughart II, and Al L. Williams. 1993. Private school enrollment and public school performance. Public Choice76 (4): 301-312.
9.
Dalton, James E., and David W. Penn. 1976. The concentration-profitability relationship: Is there a critical concentration ratio?Journal of Industrial Economics25 (2): 133-142.
10.
Dee, Thomas S.1998. Competition and the quality of public schools. Economics of Education Review17 (4): 419-427.
11.
Duncombe, William, Jerry Miner, and John Ruggiero. 1997. Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency. Public Choice93:1-18.
12.
Duncombe, William, and John Yinger. 1998. School finance reform: Aid formulas and equity objectives. National Tax Journal51 (2): 239-262.
13.
Eberts, Randall W., Ellen K. Schwartz, and Joe A. Stone. 1990. School reform, school size, and student achievement. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Review26 (Quarter 2): 2-15.
14.
Friedman, Milton. 1955. The role of government in education. In Economics and the public interest, ed. Robert Solo. New York: Rutgers University Press.
15.
Geller, Christopher R. 2000. Private schools and public quality: An analysis of the effects of private schools on public school performance. Ph.D. diss., Georgia State University, Atlanta.
16.
Georgia Department of Education. 1971-1994. Unofficial information on non-public schools in Georgia Submitted to the State Department of Education. Atlanta: Publications and Information Services, General Support Division, Office of Administrative Services, Georgia Department of Education. (Continued as Directory of non-public schools in Georgiain 1984)
17.
Georgia Department of Education. 1985-1990. Georgia public education directory: State and local schools and staff. Atlanta: Publications and Information Services, General Support Division, Office of Administrative Services, Georgia Department of Education.
18.
Georgia Department of Education. 1986-1993. Georgia Student Assessment Programofficial state summary. Atlanta: Publications and Information Services, General Support Division, Office of Administrative Services, Georgia Department of Education.
19.
Gill, Brian P., P. Michael Timpane, Karen E. Ross, and Dominic J. Brewer. 2001. Rhetoric versus reality: What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
20.
Goldhaber, Dan D., and Eric R. Eide. 2003. Methodological thoughts on measuring the impact of private sector competition on the educational marketplace. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis25 (2): 217-232.
21.
Greene, Kenneth V., and Byung-Geo Kang. 2004. The effect of public and private competition on high school outputs in New York state. Economics of Education Review23 (3): 497-506.
22.
Hanushek, Eric A.1986. The economics of schooling. Journal of Economic Literature24: 1141-1177.
23.
Hanushek, Eric A., Steven G. Rivkin, and Lori Taylor. 1996. Aggregation and the estimated effects of school resources. Review of Economics and Statistics78 (4): 611-627.
24.
Hoxby, Caroline M.1994. Do private schools provide competition for public schools. NBER Working Paper Series no. 4978, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
25.
Hoxby, Caroline M.2000. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers?American Economic Review90 (5): 1209-1238.
26.
Hoxby, Caroline M.2003. School choice and school productivity: Could school choice be the tide that lifts all boats? In The economics of school choice, ed. Caroline M. Hoxby. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Miguel Urquiola. 2002. When schools compete, how do they compete? An assessment of Chile's nationwide school voucher program. Occasional Paper no. 43, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
28.
Jepsen, Christopher. 2000. The private schooling market and its effects on student achievement. Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
29.
Jepsen, Christopher. 2002. The role of aggregation in estimating the effects of private school competition on student achievement. Journal of Urban Economics42 (3): 477-500.
30.
Madaus, George F., Thomas Kellaghan, Ernest A. Rakow, and Dennis J. King. 1979. The sensitivity of measures of school effectiveness. Harvard Education Review49:207-230.
31.
McEwan, Patrick J.2000. Comparing the effectiveness of public and private schools: A review of evidence and interpretation. Occasional Paper no. 3, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
32.
McMahon, Walter W.1996. Intrastate cost adjustments. In Selected papers in school finance 1994, ed. William J. Fowler Jr.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
33.
McMillan, Robert. 2001a. Competition, parental involvement and public school performance. In Proceedings of the Ninety Third Annual Conference on Taxation. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
34.
McMillan, Robert. 2001b. The identification of competitive effects using cross-section data: An empirical analysis of public school performance. Manuscript, University of Toronto, Canada.
35.
New mark, Craig M.1995. Another look at whether private schools influence public school quality: Comment. Public Choice82 (3-4): 365-373.
36.
Rangazas, Peter. 1997. Competition and private school vouchers. Education Economics5 (3): 245-263.
37.
Rouse, Cecilia E., and M. McLaughlin. 1998. Can the invisible hand improve education? A reviewof competition and school efficiency. Working Paper, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
38.
Ruggiero, John. 1996. Efficiency of educational production: An analysis of New York school districts. Review of Economics and Statistics78 (3): 499-509.
39.
Sander, William. 1999. Private schools and public school achievement. Journal of Human Resources34 (4): 697-709.
40.
Simon, Christopher A., and Nicholas P. Lovrich Jr.1996. Private school enrollment and public school performance: Assessing the effects of competition upon public school student achievement in Washington state. Policy Studies Journal24 (4): 666-675.
41.
Teske, Paul, Mark Schneider, Jack Buckley, and Sara Clark. 2000. Does charter school competition improve traditional public schools? Civic Report no. 10, Center for Civic Innovation, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, New York.
42.
Tiebout, Charles M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416-424.
43.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1981. U.S. Census of Population and Housing 1980, Summary Tape File 3A, Georgia. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
44.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1991. U.S. Census of Population and Housing 1990, Summary Tape File 3A, Georgia. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
