State lotteries have been adopted by thirty-eight states, primarily as a means of funding “good causes” or closing budgetary gaps. While several studies have identified the regressive nature of lotteries and factors responsible for their expansion, less is known about the underlying voting patterns that have driven this expansion. This article examines county-level voting patterns from the 2002 Tennessee lottery referendum and county-level lottery expenditures to determine whether voting reflects a latent demand for lottery or is a deliberate attempt to shift the tax burden. The results indicate that the percentage voting for lottery approval and lottery expenditure is not correlated with income and negatively correlated with education. Voting patterns are therefore similar to lottery participation, suggesting that voting reflects a latent demand for lottery. Lottery expenditure patterns for border counties exhibit familiar cross-border shopping patterns. Casino gambling is a substitute for instant but not online games.
Alm, James, Michael McKee, and Mark Skidmore. 1993. Fiscal pressure, tax competition, and the introduction of state lotteries. National Tax Journal46 (4): 463-476.
2.
Anderson, Mickie. 2002. Vote assures win ticket for lottery, Sen. Cohen. The Commercial Appeal(Memphis), November 6, p. A1-A1.
3.
Bergstrom, Theodore C., and Robert P. Goodman. 1973. Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review63 (3): 280-296.
4.
Borg, Mary O., and Paul M. Mason. 1988. The budgetary incidence of lottery to support education. National Tax Journal41 (1): 75-85.
5.
Brinner, Roger E., and Charles T. Clotfelter. 1975. An economic appraisal of state lotteries. National Tax Journal28 (4): 395-404.
6.
Butterfield, Fox. 2005. As gambling grows, states depend on their cut. New York Times, March 31, p. C1-C1.
7.
Clotfelter, Charles T., and Philip J. Cook. 1987. Implicit taxation in lottery finance. National Tax Journal40 (4): 533-546.
8.
Clotfelter, Charles T., and Philip J. Cook. 1989. Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Clotfelter, Charles T., and Philip J. Cook. 1990. Onthe economics of state lotteries. Journal of Economic Perspectives4 (4) 105-120.
10.
Crary, David. 2002. Odds 2-to-1 Tennessee will approve lottery. The Tulsa World, September 29, p. A5-A5.
11.
Deacon, Robert, and Perry Shapiro. 1975. Private preference for collective goods revealed through voting on referenda. American Economic Review65 (5): 943-955.
12.
Elliott, Donald S., and John C. Navin. 2002. Has riverboat gambling reduced state lottery revenue?Public Finance Review30 (3): 235-247.
13.
Ellison, Christopher G., and Kathleen A. Nybroten. 1999. Conservative protestantism and opposition to state-sponsored lotteries: Evidence from the 1997 Texas poll. Social Science Quarterly80 (2): 356-369.
14.
Garrett, Thomas A., and Thomas L. Marsh. 2002. The revenue impact of cross-border lottery shopping in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Regional Science and Urban Economics32 (4): 501-519.
15.
Garrett, Thomas A., and Russell Sobel. 1999. Gamblers favor skewness, not risk: Further evidence from United States' lottery games. Economics Letters63 (1): 85-90.
16.
Gulley, O. David, and Frank A. Scott. 1989. Lottery effects on pari-mutuel tax revenue. National Tax Journal42 (1): 89-93.
17.
Gulley, O. David, and Frank A. Scott. 1993. The demand forwagering on state-operated lotto games. National Tax Journal46 (1): 13-22.
18.
Hansen, Ann. 1995. The tax incidence of the Colorado state lottery instant game. Public Finance Quarterly23 (3): 385-398.
19.
Heavy, Jerome F.1978. The incidence of state lottery taxes. Public Finance Quarterly6 (4): 415-426.
20.
Hersch, Philip L., and Gerald S. McDougall. 1989. Do people put their money where their votes are? The case of lottery tickets. Southern Economic Journal56 (1): 32-38.
21.
Hilmer, Michael J.2001. A comparison of alternative specifications of the college attendance equation with an extension to two-stage selectivity-correction models. Economics of Education Review. 20 (3): 263-278.
22.
Joubert, Charles E.2000. Predictors of support to legalize a state lottery in Alabama counties. Psychological Reports86:1134-1134.
23.
Kane, Thomas J.1994. College entry by blacks since 1970: The role of college costs, family background, and the returns to education. Journal of Political Economy102 (5): 878-911.
24.
Kitchen, Harry, and Scott Powells. 1991. Lottery expenditures in Canada: A regional analysis of determinant and incidence. Applied Economics23 (12): 1845-1852.
25.
Mikesell, John L.1989. A note on the changing incidence of state lottery finance. Social Science Quarterly70 (2): 513-521.
26.
National Gambling Impact Study Commission. 1999. Final report. http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ngisc/reports/fullrpt.html.
27.
Noam, Eli M.1980. The efficiency of direct democracy. Journal of Political Economy88 (4): 803-810.
28.
Price, Donald I., and Shawn E. Novak. 2000. The income redistribution effects of Texas state lottery games. Public Finance Review28 (1): 82-92.
29.
Schneider, Friedrich, and Werner W. Pommerehne. 1981. Free riding and collective action: An experiment in public microeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Economics96 (4): 689-704.
30.
Scoggins, John F.1995. The lotto and expected net revenue. National Tax Journal48 (1): 61-70.
31.
Scott, Frank, and John Garen. 1994. Probability of purchase, amount of purchase, and the demographic incidence of the lottery tax. Journal of Public Economics54 (1): 121-143.
32.
Thaler, Richard H., and William T. Ziemba. 1988. Anomalies: Pari-mutuel betting markets: racetracks and lotteries. Journal of Economic Perspectives2 (2): 161-174.
33.
Tosun, Mehmet S., and Mark Skidmore. 2004. Interstate competition and state lottery revenues. National Tax Journal57 (2, part 1): 163-178.
34.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35.
Vasche, Jon D.1990. The net revenue effect of California's lottery. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management9 (4): 561-564.
36.
Worthington, Andrew C.2001. Implicit finance in gambling expenditures: Australian evidence on socioeconomic and demographic tax incidence. Public Finance Review29 (4): 326-342.
