The effective state corporate tax rate fell significantly during the past fifteen years despite the very robust growth in corporate book profits. This article examines the causes of the decline with a focus on the effects of the relatively new option of forming limited liability companies (LLCs), state tax policy, and changes in the federal base. The effects are estimated using a simultaneous equation model and a twelve-year panel for U.S. states. The results confirm that the advent and growth of LLCs have been important causes of the decline in corporate tax revenues. In addition, changes in the federal corporate tax base, the propensity of states to grant tax incentives, and the failure of states to require combined reporting have been significant factors in falling corporate tax revenues.
Anand, Bharat N., and Richard Sansing. 2000. The weighting game: Formula apportionment as an instrument of public policy. National Tax Journal53 (2): 183-199.
2.
Ayres, Benjamin C., C. Bryan Cloyd, and John R. Robinson. 1996. Organizational form and taxes: An empirical analysis of small businesses. Journal of the American Taxation Association18 (Suppl.): 49-67.
3.
Bartik, Timothy J.1985. Business location decisions in the United States: Estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes, and other characteristics of states. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics3 (1): 14-22.
4.
Brunori, David. 2001. State tax policy: A political perspective. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
5.
Cornia, Gary, Kelly D. Edmiston, David L. Sjoquist, and Sally Wallace. 2005. The disappearing state corporate income tax. National Tax Journal58 (1): 115-138.
6.
Damadaran, Aswath, John Kose, and Crocker H Liu. 1997. The determinants of organizational form changes: Evidence and implications from real estate. Journal of Financial Economics45 (2): 169-192.
7.
Desai, Mihir A. 2002. The corporate profit base, tax sheltering activity, and the changing nature of employee compensation. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper,Cambridge, MA.
8.
Desai, Mihir A., and James R. Hines. 2002. Value-added taxes and international trade: The evidence. University of Michigan Working Paper, Ann Arbor.
9.
Edmiston, Kelly D.2002. Strategic apportionment of the state corporate income tax. National Tax Journal55 (2): 239-262.
10.
Fay, Elisa, and Sharlene Amitay. 2001. Attention LLC members: Is nexus a foregone conclusion?State Tax Notes67 (37): 821-826.
11.
Fox, William F., and LeAnn Luna. 2002. State corporate tax revenue trends: Causes and possible solutions. National Tax Journal55 (3): 491-508.
12.
Gentry, William. 1994. Taxes, financial decisions and organizational form: Evidence from publicly traded partnerships. Journal of Public Economics53 (2): 223-244.
13.
Goolsbee, Austan. 2002. The impact and inefficiency of the corporate income tax: Evidence from state organizational form data. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.
14.
Goolsbee, Austan, and Edward L. Maydew. 2000. Coveting thy neighbor’s manufacturing: The dilemma of state income apportionment. Journal of Public Economics75 (1): 125-143.
15.
Gordon, Roger H., and Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason. 1994. Tax distortions to the choice of organizational form. Journal of Public Economics55 (2): 279-306.
16.
Gordon, Roger, and John D. Wilson. 1986. An examination of multijurisdictional corporate income taxation under formula apportionment. Econometrica54 (6): 1357-1373.
17.
Guenther, David. 1992. Taxes and organizational form: A comparison of corporations and master limited partnerships. Accounting Review67 (1): 17-45.
18.
Gupta, Sanjay, and Mary Ann Hoffman. 2003. The effect of state income tax apportionment and tax incentives on new capital expenditures. Journal of the American Taxation Association25 (Suppl.): 1-25.
19.
Haas, June S.2003. Passthrough nexus? Nexus issues for nonresident corporate partners, members, and shareholders. State Tax Notes28 (6): 561-566.
20.
Hayashi, Masayoshi, and Robin Boadway. 2001. An empirical analysis of intergovernmental tax interaction: The case of business income taxes in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics34 (2): 481-503.
21.
Klassen, Kenneth J., and Douglas A. Shackelford. 1998. State and provincial corporate tax planning: Income shifting and sales apportionment factor management. Journal of Accounting and Economics25 (3): 385-406.
22.
Lowy, Peter A., and Juan F. Vasquez Jr.2003. When is it constitutional for states to tax nonresi-dent members of limited liability companies?State Tax Notes28 (7): 633-644.
23.
Luna, LeAnn. 2004. Corporate tax avoidance strategies and states’ efforts to prevent abuses. Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives14 (2): 6-17, 46-47.
24.
McIntyre, Micheal J., Paul Mines, and Richard D. Pomp. 2001. Designing a combined reporting regime for a state corporate income tax: A case study of Louisiana. Louisiana Law Review61:699-761.
25.
Omer, Thomas C., George Plesko, and Marjorie K. Shelley. 2000. The influence of tax costs on organizational choice in the natural resource industry. Journal of the American Taxation Association22 (1): 38-55.
26.
Plesko, George A.1994. Corporate taxation and the financial characteristics of firms. Public Finance Quarterly22 (3): 311-334.
27.
Pomp, Richard D.1998. The future of the state corporate income tax: Reflections (and confessions) of a tax lawyer. In The future of state taxation, ed. David Brunori, 49-72. Washington,DC: Urban Institute Press.
28.
Regan, Lareen, and Larry Y. Tzeng. 1999. Organizational form in the property-liability insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance66 (2): 253-273.
29.
Scholes, Myron S., and Mark A. Wolfson. 1992. Taxes and business strategies: A planning approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Terando, William D., and Thomas C. Omer. 1993. Corporate characteristics associated with master limited partnership formation. Journal of the American Taxation Association15 (1):23-45.
31.
Wasylenko, Michael. 1997. Taxation and economic development: The state of the economic literature. New England Economic Review, March/April, pp. 37-52.
32.
Watkinson, Troy S.1989. LIFO recapture on conversion from C corporation to S corporation: An S corporation penalty and failure in tax policy. The Tax Lawyer42 (3): 841-858.
