This study extends prior research explaining the role of taxes in investment decisions regarding depreciable business assets. It also assesses whether firms’U.S. alternative minimum tax (AMT) status influenced the level of machinery and equipment retired. The article shows analytically that firms paying the AMT have costs of capital lower than firms paying the regular tax when debt shares (debt-to-asset ratio) in their capital structure were lower than a critical level. Two hypotheses are tested: (a) whether firms that paid the AMT and had debt shares below a critical level retired higher amounts of machinery and equipment than other firms and (b) whether firms that paid the AMT retired lower amounts of machinery and equipment in the period following the modification of the AMT formula in 1989 than in the pre-1990 period. Analysis of COMPUSTAT data froma sample of 95 industrial firms over the 1987-1993period supports both hypotheses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Auerbach, A. J., and K. Hassett. 1991. Investment, tax policy and the TaxReform Act of 1986. In lDo R taxes matter? The impact of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, edited by Joel Slemord. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Bernheim, B. D. 1989. Incentive effects of the corporate alternative minimum tax. In Tax policy and the economy, vol. 3, edited by Lawrence Summers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Billings, B. A., and J. Hamilton. 2002. Taxes and the acquisition of depreciable assets: The Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the alternative minimum tax.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy21 (4-5): 423-452.
4.
Boynton, C. E., P. S. Dobbins, and G. A. Plesko. 1992. Earnings management and the corporate alternative minimum tax.Journal of Accounting Research30 (Suppl.): 131-153.
5.
Brenner, M., and I. Venezia. 1983. The effects of inflation and taxes on growth investments and replacement policies.Journal of Finance38:1519-1529.
6.
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989. Public Law No. 101-239.
7.
Burns, J. O., S. Hreha, and M. Luttman. 1989. Corporate leasing versus property ownership under the Tax Reform Act of 1986.Journal of the American Taxation Association11 (Fall): 105-113.
8.
Chen, S. N. 1991. Optimal asset abandonment and replacement: Tax and inflation considerations.Financial Review26:157-177.
9.
Chirinko, R. S. 1986. Business investment and tax policy: A perspective on existing models and empirical results.National Tax Journal39:137-155.
10.
Cordes, J. J., H. S. Watson, and J. S. Gauger. 1987. Effects of tax reform on high technology firms.National Tax Journal40:373-391.
11.
Cummins, J., and G. Hassett. 1992. The effects of taxation on investment: New evidence from firm level panel data.National Tax Journal45:243-251.
12.
Dhaliwal, D., and S. Wang. 1992. The effect of book income adjustment in the 1986 alternative minimum tax on corporate financial reporting.Journal of Accounting and Economics15:7-26.
13.
Dworin, L. 1987. Impact of the corporate alternative minimum tax: A Monte Carlo simulation study.Compendium of Tax Research40:253-278.
14.
Dyl, E., and H. W. Long. 1969. Abandonment value and capital budgeting: Comment.Journal of Finance24:88-95.
15.
Givoly, D., C. Hayn, A. Ofer, and O. Sarig. 1992. Taxes and capital structure: Evidence from firms’ response to the Tax Reform Act of 1986.Review of Financial Studies5:331-355.
16.
Graetz, M. J., and E. M. Sunley. 1988. Minimum taxes and comprehensive tax reform. In Uneasy compromise: Problems of a hybrid income-consumption tax, edited by Henry J. Aaron, Harvey Galper, and Joseph A. Pechman. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17.
Graham, J. 1996a. Debt and the marginal tax rate.Journal of Financial Economics41:41-73.
18.
Graham, J. 1996b. Proxies for the corporate marginal tax rate.Journal of Financial Economics41:187-221.
19.
Graham, J., M. L. Lemmon, and J. S. Schallheim. 1998. Debt, leases, taxes and the endogeneity of corporate tax status.Journal of Finance53:131-158.
20.
Gramlich, J. D. 1991. The effect of the alternative minimum tax book income adjustment on accrual decisions.Journal of the American Taxation Association13 (Spring): 36-56.
21.
Henderson, Y., and B. Liebman. 1992. Capital costs, industrial mix and the composition of business investment.New England Economic Review, January-February, 67-92.
22.
Hulten, C., and F. Wykoff. 1981. The measurement of economic depreciation. In Inflation and the taxation of income from capital, edited by Charles R. Hulten, 81-132. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
23.
Lucke, R. B., M. R. Eisenach, and L. L. Dildine. 1986. The Senate alternative minimum tax: Does it snare only the tax abusers?Tax Notes32:681-690.
24.
Lyon, A. B. 1990. Investment incentives under the alternative minimum tax.National Tax Journal43:451-466.
25.
Manzon, G. B., Jr. 1992. Earnings management of firms subject to the alternative minimum tax. Journal of the American Taxation Association14 (Fall): 88-111.
26.
National Accounting Automated Research System (NAARS). 1998. Company Financial Reports, Dayton, Ohio: NAARS.
27.
Shevlin, T. 1990. Estimating corporate marginal tax rates with asymmetric tax treatment of gains and losses.Journal of the American Taxation Association12 (Spring): 51-67.
28.
Standard and Poor. 1998.COMPUSTAT general file. New York: Standard and Poor.
29.
Stiglitz, J. E. 1973. Taxation, corporate financial policy and the cost of capital.Journal of Public Economics2:1-34.
30.
Tax Reform Act of 1986. Public Law No. 99-514.
31.
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. Public Law No. 105-34.
