The Whitman administration’s 30% reduction in New Jersey’s personal income taxes from 1994 to 1996 is prominently cited as a role model for state fiscal policy. The authors investigate whether the growth benefits attributed to the Whitman tax cuts are warranted. Panel data methods are applied to annual observations of county-level employment growth fromNew Jersey and the surrounding economic region. This study’s analysis does not support the hypothesis that tax cuts stimulated employment growth in New Jersey. Although New Jersey did experience substantial employment growth subsequent to the tax cuts, most of this growth was shared by the nearby Economic Areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartik, Timothy J. 1991. Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research .
2.
Bartik, Timothy J. 1997. Discussion of Wasylenko’s and Fisher’s reviews. New England Economic Review, March-April, 67-71.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series crosssection data . American Political Science Review89: 634-647 .
4.
Becsi, Zolt. 1996. Do state and local taxes affect relative state growth? Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review81: 18-36 .
5.
Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case. 1995. Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition . American Economic Review85: 25-45 .
6.
Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case. 2000. Unnatural experiments? Estimating the incidence of endogenous policies . Economic Journal110: 672-694 .
7.
Carlino, Gerald A., and Robert F. DeFina. 1998. The differential regional effects of monetary policy . Review of Economics and Statistics80: 572-587 .
8.
Carroll, Robert, and Michael Wasylenko. 1994. Do state business climates still matter? Evidence of a structural change . National Tax Journal7: 19-37 .
9.
Case, Anne. 1993. Interstate tax competition after TRA85 . Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12: 136-148 .
10.
Congressional Quarterly, Inc. 2000. American political leaders, 1789-2000. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press .
11.
Duggan, Mark. 2000. More guns, more crime. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 7967, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
12.
Garfield, Reed. 1996. Tax cuts and balanced budgets: A tour of Lansing and Trenton. Mimeo, Joint Economic Committee Report.
13.
Gold, Steven D. 1996. State tax cuts of 1995: Is something new afoot? Public Budgeting and Finance16: 3-22 .
14.
Helms, L. Jay. 1985. The effect of state and local taxes on economic growth: A time series-cross section analysis . Review of Economics and Statistics67: 574-582 .
15.
Johnson, Kenneth. 1995. Redefinition of the BEA economic areas . Survey of Current Business75: 75-81 .
16.
Kmenta, Jan. 1986. Elements of econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan .
17.
Lamdin, Douglas J. 2001. Implementing and interpreting event studies of regulatory changes . Journal of Economics and Business53: 171-183 .
18.
Lynch, Robert. 1996. Do state and local tax incentives work? Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute .
19.
MacKinlay, A. Craig. 1997. Event studies in economics and finance . Journal of Economic Literature35: 13-39 .
20.
McGuire, Therese. 1992. Review of “Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? ” National Tax Journal45: 457-459 .
21.
Miller, Stephen M., and Frank S. Russek. 1997. Fiscal structures and economic growth at the state and local level . Public Finance Review25: 213-237 .
22.
Mofidi, Alaeddin, and Joe A. Stone. 1990. Do state and local taxes affect economic growth? Review of Economics and Statistics72: 686-691 .
23.
Moore, Stephen, and Dean Stansel. 1996. Tax cuts and balanced budgets: Lessons from the states. Cato Fact Sheet, Cato Institute, Washington, DC .
24.
Moulton, Brent R. 1990. An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units . Review of Economics and Statistics72: 334-338 .
25.
Mullaney, Marie Marmo. 1994. Biographical directory of the governors of the United States, 1988-1994. Westport, CT: Meckler .
26.
Nelson, Michael A. 2000. Electoral cycles and the politics of state tax policy . Public Finance Review28: 540-560 .
27.
Office of Tax Analysis, Department of Treasury, State of New Jersey. 1998. Governor Whitman’s major tax reductions: FY94-FY99 ($M). Mimeo.
28.
Park, R. 1967. Efficient estimation of a system of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated . Journal of the American Statistical Association62: 500-509 .
29.
Phillips, Joseph, and Ernest Gross. 1995. The effect of state and local taxes on economic development: A meta-analysis . Southern Economic Journal62: 320-333 .
30.
Poot, Jacques. 2000. A synthesis of empirical research on the impact of government on long-run growth . Growth and Change31: 516-546 .
31.
Reed, Robert W., and Cynthia L. Rogers. 2000. Measurement error and endogeneity in studies of state tax policy and economic growth. Mimeo, University of Oklahoma .
32.
Tannenwald, Robert. 1996. State business tax climate: How should it be measured and how important is it? New England Economic Review, January-February, 23-38.
33.
Wasylenko, Michael. 1997. Taxation and economic development: The state of the economic literature. New England Economic Review, March-April, 37-52.
