Is it possible to replace the income tax by a consumption tax or a wage tax such that (1) a dynamic (intergenerational) Pareto improvement is obtained and (2) only the information available from enforcing the income tax is used? In this article, it is shown that such a transition is feasible if and only if in a static setting, the consumption or wage tax induces less distortions than the income tax.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altig, D., A. J. Auerbach, L. J. Kotlikoff, K. A. Smetters, and J. Walliser. 2001. Simulating fundamental tax reform in the United States. American Economic Review91: 574-595.
2.
Atkinson, A., and A. Sandmo. 1980. Welfare implications of the taxation of savings. The Economic Journal90: 529-549.
3.
Auerbach, A. 1996. Tax reform, capital allocation, efficiency, and growth. In Economic effects of fundamental tax reform, edited by H. Aaron and W. Gale, 29-73. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4.
Auerbach, A., and L. Kotlikoff. 1987. Dynamic fiscal policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Auerbach, A., L. Kotlikoff, and J. Skinner. 1983. The efficiency gains from dynamic tax reform. International Economic Review24: 81-100.
Boadway, R. 1990. The short run and long run welfare effects of implementing a practical system of consumption taxation. In Heidelberg Congress on taxing consumption, edited by M. Rose. Berlin: Springer.
8.
Bradford, D. 1996. Consumption taxes: Some fundamental transition issues. In Frontiers of tax reform, edited by M. Boskin, 123-150. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
9.
Breyer, F. 1989. On the intergenerational efficiency of pay-as-you-go financed pension schemes. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics145: 643-658.
Eidgenössische Steuerverwaltung. 2001. Steuern als Standortfaktor: Reformbedarf für die Schweiz? Schlussbericht der Arbeitsgruppe “Standortstudie.” Bern: Eidgenössische Steuerverwaltung. Available: http://www.estv.admin.ch/data/sd/d/pdf/standortstudie−d.pdf
12.
Fehr, H. 1999. Welfare effects of dynamic tax reforms. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
13.
Fenge, R. 1995. Pareto-efficiency of the pay-as-you-go pension system with intragenerational fairness. Finanzarchiv N.F.52: 357-363.
14.
Fenge, R., and R. Schwager. 1995. Pareto-improving transition from a pay-as-you-go to a fully funded pension system in a model with differing earning abilities. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsund Sozialwissenschaften115: 367-376.
15.
Gravelle, J. 1991. Income, consumption, and wage taxation in a life-cycle model: Separating efficiency from redistribution. American Economic Review81: 985-995.
16.
Gravelle, J. 1994. The economic effects of taxing capital income. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Homburg, S. 1990. The efficiency of unfunded pension systems. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics146: 640-647.
18.
Keuschnigg, C. 1996. Dynamic tax incidence and intergenerationally neutral reform. European Economic Review38: 343-366.
19.
Lewis, K., and L. Seidman. 2000. Transitional protection during a conversion to a personal consumption tax. Public Finance Review28: 99-119.
20.
Metcalf, G. 1996. The role of value-added tax in fundamental tax reform. In Frontiers of tax reform, edited by M. Boskin, 91-109. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
