The concern over budget deficits in the mid-1980s generated a strand of literature known as the tax-spend debate, sometimes labeled the revenue-expenditure nexus. This literature has focused on the intertemporal relationship between revenues and expenditures in the generation of budget deficits. In light of the numerous empirical time-series studies on the subject, the intent of this survey article is to provide an overview of the work to date as well as provide suggestions for future research in this area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahiakpor, J. C. W., and S. Amirkhalkhali. 1989. On the difficulty of eliminating deficits with higher taxes: Some Canadian evidence. Southern Economic Journal56:24-31.
2.
Alesina, A., and T. Bayoumi. 1996. The cost and benefit of fiscal rules: Evidence from U.S. states. Working paper no. 5614, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
3.
Anderson, W., M. S. Wallace, and J. T. Warner. 1986. Government spending and taxation: What causes what? Southern Economic Journal56:24-31.
4.
Baffes, J., and A. Shah. 1994. Causality and comovement between taxes and expenditures: Historical evidence from Argentina, Brazil, and Argentina. Journal of Development Economics44 (2): 311-331.
5.
Baghestani, H., and R. McNown. 1994. Do revenues or expenditures respond to budgetary disequilibria? Southern Economic Journal60:311-322.
6.
Barro, R. J. 1979. On the determination of the public debt. Journal of Political Economy81:940-971.
7.
Bella, M., and B. Quinteri. 1995. Causality between public expenditure and taxation: Evidence from the Italian case. Economic Notes24 (1): 45-68.
8.
Bennett, J. T., and T. J. DiLorenzo. 1983. Off-budget activities of local governments: The bane of the tax revolt. Public Choice39:333-342.
9.
Bernanke, B. 1986. Alternative explanations of the money-income correlation. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy25:49-100.
10.
Blackley, P. R. 1986. Causality between revenues and expenditures and the size of the federal budget. Public Finance Quarterly14 (2): 139-156.
11.
Bohn, H. 1991. Budget balance through revenue or spending adjustments? Journal of Monetary Economics27:333-359.
12.
Bohn, H., and R. Inman. 1996. Balanced budget rules and public deficits: Evidence from the U.S. states. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy45:13-76.
13.
Buchanan, J. M., and R. W. Wagner. 1977. Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Caines, P. E., C. W. Keng, and S. P. Sethi. 1981. Causality analysis and multivariate autoregressive modelling with an application to supermarket sales analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control5:267-298.
15.
Chang, T., W. R. Liu, and S. B. Caudill. 2002. Tax-and-spend, spend-ant-tax, or fiscal synchronization: New evidence for ten countries. Applied Economics34:1553-1561.
16.
Cheng, B. S. 1999. Causality between taxes and expenditures: Evidence from Latin American countries. Journal of Economics and Finance23 (2): 184-192.
17.
Chowdhury, A. R. 1988. Expenditures and receipts in state and local government finances: Comment. Public Choice59:277-285.
18.
Dahlberg, M., and E. Johansson. 1998. The revenues-expenditures nexus: Panel data evidence from Swedish municipalities. Applied Economics30:1379-1386.
19.
Darrat, A. 1998. Tax and spend, or spend and tax? An inquiry into the Turkisk budgetary process. Southern Economic Journal64 (4): 940-956.
20.
Darrat, A. 2002. Budget balance through spending cuts or tax adjustments? Contemporary Economic Policy20 (3): 221-233.
21.
De Haan, J., and C. L. Siermann. 1993. The intertemporal government budget constraint: An application for the Netherlands. Public Finance48 (2): 243-249.
22.
Eichengreen, B., and T. Bayoumi. 1994. The political economy of fiscal restrictions: Implications for Europe from the United States. European Economic Review38:783-791.
23.
Engle, R. F., and C. W. J. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica (March): 251-276.
24.
Engle, R. F., and B. S. Yoo. 1987. Forecasting and testing in cointegrated systems. Journal of Econometrics35:143-159.
25.
Ewing, B. T., and J. E. Payne. 1998. Government revenue-expenditure nexus: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Economic Development23 (2): 57-69.
26.
Friedman, M. 1978. The limitations of tax limitation. Policy Review (summer): 7-14.
27.
Garcia, S., and P. Y. Henin. 1999. Balancing budget through tax increases or expenditure cuts: Is it neutral? Economic Modelling16:591-612.
28.
Granger, C. W. J. 1969. Investigating causal relationships by econometric models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica (July): 424-438.
29.
Granger, C. W. J., and J. Lin. 1995. Causality in the long run. Econometric Theory11:530-536.
30.
Guilkey, D. K., and M. K. Salemi. 1982. Small sample properties of three tests of Granger-causal ordering in a bivariate stochastic system. Review of Economics and Statistics (November): 668-680.
31.
Hakkio, C. S., and M. Rush. 1991. Is the budget deficit too large? Economic Inquiry29:429-445.
32.
Hamilton, J. D., and M. A. Flavin. 1986. On the limitations of government borrowing: A framework for testing. American Economic Review76:808-819.
33.
Hasan, M., and I. Lincoln. 1997. Tax then spend or spend then tax? Experience in the UK, 1961-1993. Applied Economics Letters4:237-239.
34.
Hasan, S. Y., and A. H. Sukar. 1995. Short and long-run dynamics of expenditures and revenues and the government budget constraint: Further evidence. Journal of Economics22 (2): 35-42.
35.
Hatemi-j, A., and G. Shukur. 1999. The causal nexus of government spending and revenue in Finland: A bootstrap approach. Applied Economics Letters6:641-644.
36.
Haug, A. A. 1991. Cointegration and government borrowing constraints: Evidence for the United States. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics9 (1): 197-201.
37.
Haug, A. A. 1995. Has federal budget deficit policy changed in recent years? Economic Inquiry33:104-118.
38.
Hendry, D. F., and J. F. Richard. 1982. On the formulation of empirical models in dynamic econometrics. Journal of Econometrics20:3-33.
39.
Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. S. Rosen. 1988. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica56 (6): 1371-1395.
40.
Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. S. Rosen. 1989. The revenues-expenditures nexus: Evidence from local government data. International Economic Review30 (2): 415-429.
41.
Hondroyiannis, G., and E. Papapetrou. 1996. An examination of the causal relationship between government spending and revenue: A cointegration analysis. Public Choice89 (3-4): 363-374.
42.
Hoover, K. D., and S. M. Sheffrin. 1992. Causation, spending, and taxes: Sand in the sandbox or tax collector for the welfare state? American Economic Review82 (1): 225-248.
43.
Hsaio, C. 1981. Autoregressive modelling and money-income causality detection. Journal of Monetary Economics (July): 85-106.
44.
Huang, C., and D. P. Tang. 1992. Government revenue, expenditure, and national income: A Granger causal analysis of the case of Taiwan. China Economic Review3(2): 135-148.
45.
Hylleberg, S., R. F. Engle, C. W. J. Granger, and B. S. Yoo. 1990. Seasonal integration and cointegration. Journal of Econometrics44:215-238.
46.
Islam, M. Q. 2001. Structural break, unit root, and the causality between government expenditures and revenues. Applied Economics Letters8:565-567.
47.
Johansen, S. 1988. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control12:231-254.
48.
Johansen, S., and K. Juselius. 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration: With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (May): 169-210.
49.
Jondeau, E. 1992. La soutenabilite de la politique budgetaire. Economie et Prevision104:1-17.
50.
Jones, J. D., and D. Joulfaian. 1991. Federal government expenditures and revenues in the early years of the American republic: Evidence from 1792-1860. Journal of Macroeconomics13 (1): 133-155.
51.
Joulfaian, D., and R. Mookerjee. 1990a. The government revenue-expenditure nexus: Evidence from a state. Public Finance Quarterly18 (1): 92-103.
52.
Joulfaian, D., and R. Mookerjee. 1990b. The intertemporal relationship between state and local government revenues and expenditures: Evidence from OECD countries. Public Finance45 (1): 109-117.
53.
Joulfaian, D., and R. Mookerjee. 1991. Dynamics of government revenues and expenditures in industrial economies. Applied Economics23 (12): 1839-1844.
54.
Katrakilidis, C. P. 1997. Spending and revenues in Greece: New evidence from error correction modelling. Applied Economics Letters4 (6): 387-391.
55.
Kimenyi, M. S. 1990. The causal relationship between revenues and expenditures: A developing country case study. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice8 (1): 3-11.
56.
Kollias, C., and S. Makrydakis. 1995. The causal relationship between tax revenues and government spending in Greece: 1950-1990. Cyprus Journal of Economics8 (2): 120-135.
57.
Kollias, C., and S. Makrydakis. 2000. Tax and spend or spend and tax? Empirical evidence from Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Ireland. Applied Economics32 (5): 533-546.
58.
Koren, S., and A. Stiassny. 1995. Tax and spend or spend and tax? An empirical investigation for Austria. Empirica22 (2): 127-149.
59.
Koren, S., and A. Stiassny. 1998. Tax and spend, or spend and tax? An international study. Journal of Policy Modeling20 (2): 163-191.
60.
Kremers, J. M. J. 1988. Long run limits on the U.S. federal debt. Economics Letters28:259-262.
61.
Kremers, J. M. J. 1989. U.S. federal indebtedness and the conduct of fiscal policy. Journal of Monetary Economics23:219-238.
62.
Lane, P., and A. Tornell. 1998. The political economy of fiscal restrictions: Implications for Europe from the United States. European Economic Review38:783-791.
63.
Lee, D. R., and R. K. Vedder. 1992. Friedman tax cuts vs. Buchanan deficit reduction as the best way of constraining government. Economic Inquiry30:722-732.
64.
Li, X. 2001. Government revenue, government expenditure, and temporal causality: Evidence from China. Applied Economics33:485-497.
65.
Lutkepohl, H. 1982. Non-causality due to omitted variables. Journal of Econometrics19:367-378.
66.
Manage, N., and M. L. Marlow. 1986. The causal relation between federal expenditures and receipts. Southern Economic Journal52:617-629.
67.
Marlow, M. L., and N. Manage. 1987. Expenditures and receipts: Testing for causality in state and local government finances. Public Choice53:243-255.
68.
Marlow, M. L., and N. Manage. 1988. Expenditures and receipts in state and local government finances: Reply. Public Choice59:287-290.
69.
Meltzer, A. H., and S. F. Richard. 1981. A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy89:914-927.
70.
Miller, S. M., and F. S. Russek. 1989. Co-integration and error-correction models: The temporal causality between government taxes and spending. Southern Economic Journal57:221-229.
71.
Mithani, D. M., and G. S. Khoon. 1999. Causality between government expenditure and revenue in Malaysia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin16 (1): 68-79.
72.
Mounts, W. S., and C. Sowell. 1997. Taxing, spending, and the budget process: The role of budget regimes in the intertemporal budget constraint. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics133 (3): 421-439.
73.
Musgrave, R. 1966. Principles of budget determination. In Public finance: Selected readings, edited by H. Cameron and W. Henderson. New York: Random House.
74.
Owoye, O. 1995. The causal relationship between taxes and expenditures in the G7 countries: Cointegration and error correction models. Applied Economics Letters2:19-22.
75.
Park, W. K. 1998. Granger causality between government revenues and expenditures in Korea. Journal of Economic Development23 (1): 145-155.
76.
Payne, J. E. 1997a. International evidence on the sustainability of budget deficits. Applied Economics Letters4 (12): 775-779.
77.
Payne, J. E. 1997b. The tax-spend debate: The case of Canada. Applied Economics Letters4 (6): 381-386.
78.
Payne, J. E. 1998. The tax-spend debate: Time series evidence from state budgets. Public Choice95 (3-4): 307-320.
79.
Peacock, A. T., and J. Wiseman. 1979. Approaches to the analysis of government expenditure growth. Public Finance Quarterly7:3-23.
80.
Poterba, J. 1994. State responses to fiscal crises: The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy102:798-821.
81.
Provopoulos, G., and A. Zambaras. 1991. Testing for causality between government spending and taxation. Public Choice68 (1-3): 277-282.
82.
Ram, R. 1988a. Additional evidence on causality between government revenue and government expenditure. Southern Economic Journal54:763-769.
83.
Ram, R. 1988b. A multicountry perspective on causality between government revenue and government expenditure. Public Finance43 (2): 261-269.
84.
Roberts, P. C. 1978. Idealism in public choice theory. Journal of Monetary Economics (August): 603-616.
85.
Ross, K. L., and J. E. Payne. 1998. A rexamination of budgetary disequilibria. Public Finance Review26 (1): 67-79.
86.
Sims, C. A. 1972. Money, income, and causality. American Economic Review62:540-552.
87.
Sims, C. A. 1980. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica48:1-48.
88.
Smith, G. W., and S. E. Zin. 1991. Persistent deficits and the market value of government debt. Journal of Applied Econometrics6:31-44.
89.
Sorensen, B. E., L. Wu, and O. Yosha. 2001. Output fluctuations and fiscal policy: U.S. state and local governments, 1978-1994. European Economic Review45:1271-1310.
90.
Tanner, E., and P. Liu. 1994. Is the budget deficit “too large”? Some further evidence. Economic Inquiry32 (3): 511-518.
91.
Trehan, B., and C. E. Walsh. 1988. Common trends, the government's budget constraint, and revenue smoothing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control12:425-444.
92.
Vamvoukas, G. 1997a. Budget expenditures and revenues: An application of error-correction modelling. Public Finance52 (1): 125-138.
93.
Vamvoukas, G. 1997b. Le relazioni di causalita tra spese ed entrate di bilancio. Rivista di Politica Economica87 (5): 77-95.
94.
von Furstenberg, G. M., R. J. Green, and J. Jeong. 1985. Have taxes led government expenditures? The United States as a test case. Journal of Public Policy5 (3): 321-348.
95.
von Furstenberg, G. M., R. J. Green, and J. Jeong. 1986. Tax and spend, or spend and tax? Review of Economics and Statistics68 (2): 179-188.
96.
Wagner, R. E. 1976. Revenue structure, fiscal illusion, and budgetary choice. Public Choice (spring): 30-61.
97.
Wilcox, D. 1989. The sustainability of government deficits: Implications of the present value borrowing constraint. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking21:291-306.
98.
Wildavsky, A. 1988. The new politics of the budgetary process. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
