The traditional test of the public-goods crowding-out effect may mask important impacts of government subsidies on private giving because it confounds the effects of subsidies on average donation size versus their effects on the number of donors. Using panel data on the U.S. nonprofit sector, the author shows that, although increased public funding has a neutral effect on total donations, it is associated with decreased average donations but a larger pool of donors.
AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy. Various years. Giving USA. Indianapolis: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy.
2.
Andreoni, James.1990. Impure altruism ands donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving? Economic Journal100 (401):464-77.
3.
---. 1993. An experimental test of the public-goods crowding-out hypothesis. American Economic Review83 (5): 1317-27.
4.
Bergstrom, Theodore C., Lawrence E. Blume, and Hal R. Varian .1986. On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics29:25-49.
5.
Brooks, Arthur C.1999. Do public subsidies leverage private philanthropy for the arts? Empirical evidence on symphony orchestras. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly28 (1): 32-45.
6.
---. 2000a. Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits ? Public Administration Review60 (3): 211-18.
7.
---. 2000b. Public subsidies and charitable giving: Crowding out, crowding in, or both? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management19 (3): 451-64.
8.
Clotfelter, Charles T.1980. Tax incentives and charitable giving: Evidence from a panel of taxpayers. Journal of Public Economics13:319-40.
9.
Council of Economic Advisors.Economic report of the president. Various years. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
10.
Duncan, Brian.1999. Modeling charitable contributions of time and money. Journal of Public Economics72:213-42.
11.
Feldstein, Martins, and Charles T. Clotfelter .1976. Tax incentives and charitable contributions in the United States: A microeconomic analysis. Journal of Public Economics5 (1-2):1-26.
12.
Giving and volunteering in the United States.Various years. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
13.
Greene, William H.1998. LIMDEP user's manual, version 7.0. New York: Econometric Software.
14.
Hughes, Patricia Nold, and William Luksetich .1999. The relationship among funding sources for art and history museums. Nonprofit Management & Leadership10 (1): 21-37.
15.
Khanna, Jyoti, John Posnett, and Todd Sandler.1995. Charity donations in the U.K.: New evidence based on panel data. Journal of Public Economics56:257-72.
16.
Kingma, Bruce R.1989. An accurate measure of the crowd-out effect, income effect, and price effect for charitable contributions. Journal of Political Economy97 (5):1197-207.
17.
Lindsey, Lawrence, and Richard Steinberg .1990. Joint crowdout: An empirical study of the impact of federal grants on state government expenditures and charitable donations. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 3226.
18.
Reece, W.S.1979. Charitable contributions: New evidence on household behavior . American Economic Review69:142-51.
19.
Roberts, Russell D.1984. A positive model of private charity and public transfers . Journal of Political Economy92:136-48.
20.
---. 1987. Financing public goods. Journal of Political Economy95:420-37.
21.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan.1986. Do government grants to charity reduce private donations? In The economics of nonprofit institutions: studies in structure and policy , edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman, 313-29. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Schiff, Jerald.1985. Does government spending crowd out charitable contributions ? National Tax Journal38:535-46.
23.
---. 1990. Charitable giving and government policy: An economic analysis . Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24.
Seaman, Bruce A.1980. Economic models and support for the arts. In Economic policy for the arts, edited by William S. Hendon, James L. Shanahan, and Alice J. MacDonald, 80-95. Cambridge, MA: Abt.
25.
Steinberg, Richard.1990. Taxes and giving: New findings. Voluntas1:61-79.
26.
---. 1993. Does government spending crowd out donations? Interpreting the evidence. In The nonprofit sector in the mixed economy , edited by Avner Ben-Ner and Benedetto Gui, 99-125. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27.
United States budget, historical tables.Various fiscal years. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
28.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Various years.Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
29.
Warr, Peter G.1982. Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. Journal of Public Economics19:131-38.
30.
---. 1983. The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income. Economics Letters13 (3): 207-11.
