Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.1977. State limitations on local taxes and expenditures. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
---. 1995. Tax and expenditure limitations on local government. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
3.
Bails, D.G.1982. A critique on the effectiveness of tax-expenditure limitations . Public Choice38:129-38.
4.
---. 1990. The effectiveness of tax-expenditure limitations: A re-evaluation . American Journal of Economics and Sociology49:223-38.
5.
Bergstrom, T.C., and R.P. Goodman.1973. Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review63:280-96.
6.
Borcherding, T.E.1977. Budgets and bureaucrats: the sources of government growth . Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
7.
Borcherding, T.E., and R.T. Deacon.1972. The demand for the services of non-federal government. American Economic Review62:891-901.
8.
Bradbury, K.L., K.E. Case, and C.J. Mayer.1998. School quality and Massachusetts enrollment shifts in the context of tax limitations. New England Economic Review, July/August, pp. 3-20.
9.
Bradbury, Katharine L., Christopher J. Mayer, and Karl E. Case .2001. Property tax limits, local fiscal behavior, and property values: Evidence from Massachusetts under Proposition 2 1/2. Journal of Public Economics80:287-311.
10.
Courant P., E. Gramlich, and D. Rubinfeld.1980. Why voters support tax limitations: the Michigan case. National Tax Journal33:1-20.
11.
Downes, T.A.1992. Evaluating the impact of school-finance reform on the provision of public education: The California case. National Tax Journal45:405-19.
12.
Downes, T.A., R.F. Dye, and T.J. McGuire.1998. Do limits matter? Evidence on the effect of tax limits on student performance. Journal of Urban Economics43:401-17.
13.
Elder, H.W.1992. Exploring the tax revolt: An analysis of the effectiveness of state tax and expenditure limitation laws. Public Finance Quarterly20:47-63.
14.
Figlio, D.N.1997. Did the "tax revolt" reduce school performance? Journal of Public Economics65:245-69.
15.
---. 1998. Short-term effects of a 1990's-era tax limit: Panel evidence on Oregon's Measure 5. National Tax Journal51:55-70.
16.
Figlio, D.N., and K.S. Rueben.2001. Tax limits and the qualifications of new teachers. Journal of Public Economics80:49-71.
17.
Gray, V.1976. Models of comparative state politics: A comparison of cross-sectional and time series analysis. American Journal of Political Science20:235-56.
18.
Greene, W.H.1997. Econometric analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.
19.
Holtz-Eakin, D.1988. The line item veto and public sector budgets: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics36:269-92.
20.
Howard, M.A.1989. State tax and expenditure limitations: There is no story . Public Budgeting and Finance9:83-90.
21.
Hsiao, C.1989. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Joyce, P.G., and D.R. Mullins.1991. The changing fiscal structure of the state and local public sector: The impact of tax and expenditure limitations . Public Administration Review51:240-53.
23.
Kenyon, D.A., and K.M. Benker.1984. Fiscal discipline: Lessons from the state experience. National Tax Journal37:437-46.
24.
Ladd, H.F., and J.B. Wilson.1982. Why voters support tax limitations: Evidence from Massachusetts' Proposition 2 1/2. National Tax Journal35:121-47.
25.
Lowery, D.1983. Limitations on taxing and spending powers: an assessment of their effectiveness. Social Science Quarterly64:247-63.
26.
Mullins, D.R., and P.G. Joyce.1996. Tax and expenditure limitations and state and local fiscal structure: An empirical assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance, Spring, pp. 75-101.
27.
Murray S.E., W.E. Evans, and R.M. Schwab.1998. Education-finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review88:798-812.
28.
Oates, W.E.1985. Searching for leviathan: An empirical study. American Economic Review75:748-57.
29.
Poterba, J.M.1995a. Balanced budget rules and fiscal policy: Evidence from the states. National Tax Journal48:329-37.
30.
---. 1995b. Capital budgets, borrowing rules, and state capital spending . Journal of Public Economics56:165-87.
31.
---. 1996. Budget institutions and fiscal policy in the U.S. states . American Economic Review86:395-400.
32.
---. 1997. Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management16:48-66.
33.
Poterba, J.M., and K.S. Rueben.1995. The effect of property-tax limits on wages and employment in the local public sector. American Economic Review85:384-89.
34.
Preston, A.E., and C. Ichniowski.1991. A national perspective on the nature and effects of the local property tax revolt: 1976-1987. National Tax Journal44:123-45.
35.
Rueben, K.S.1996. Tax limitations and government growth: The effect of state tax and expenditure limits on state and local government. Paper presented at the Western Economic Association meetings, July, in San Francisco.
36.
Shadbegian, R.J.1996. Do tax and expenditure limitations affect the size and growth of state government? Contemporary Economic Policy14:22-35.
37.
---. 1998. Do tax and expenditure limitations affect local government budgets? Evidence from panel data. Public Finance Review26:218-36.
38.
---. 1999. The effect of tax and expenditure limitations on the structure of local government, 1962-1987. National Tax Journal52:221-37.
39.
---. 2000. Did Proposition 2 1/2 affect local public education in Massachusetts? Evidence from panel data. Paper presented at the 1999 International Atlantic Economic Association Conference in Montreal, Canada.