Using time-series and time-series cross-section data from the 10 Canadian provinces, the authors test several competing explanations of government growth. Multivariate analyses reveal that the results are sensitive to how government size is measured. The authors find strong empirical support for the intergovernmental grants, the bureau voting, and the electoral budget cycle explanations irrespective of the measure of government size used. The party control explanation, the fiscal supply explanation, and part of Wagner's law give superior results when they are evaluated using real (adjusted) measures of government size than when they are evaluated using nominal (unadjusted) measures. The authors find virtually no support for the personal income part of Wagner's law.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abizadeh, Sohrab. 1988. Economic development and income elasticity of demand for government. Social Indicators Review20:15-43.
2.
Abizadeh, Sohrab, and John Gray. 1992. Politics and provincial government spending in Canada. Canadian Public Administration35:519-533.
3.
Abizadeh, Sohrab, and Mahmood Yousefi. 1988. Growth of government expenditure: The case of Canada. Public Finance Quarterly16:78-100.
4.
Afxentiou, Panayiotis, and Apostolos Serletis. 1991. A time-series analysis of the relationship between government expenditure and GNP in Canada. Public Finance Review19:316-333.
5.
Alesina, Alberto, Roberto Perotti, and José Tavares. 1998. The political economy of fiscal adjustments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1:197-257.
6.
Baumol, William J.1967. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review57:415-426.
7.
Beck, Morris. 1976. The expanding public sector: Some contrary evidence. National Tax Journal29:15-21.
8.
Beck, Morris. 1979. Public sector growth: A real perspective. Public Finance34:313-343.
9.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data in comparative politics. American Political Science Review89:634-647.
10.
Berry, William D., and David Lowery. 1984. The measurement of government size: Implications for the study of government growth. Journal of Politics46:1192-1206.
11.
Bird, Richard M.1979. Financing Canadian government: A quantitative overview. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Tax Foundation.
12.
Blais, André, Donald Blake, and Stéphane Dion. 1993. Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science37:40-62.
13.
Blais, André, and Richard Nadeau. 1992. The electoral budget cycle. Public Choice74:389-403.
14.
Buchanan, James M.1977. Why does government grow? In Budgets and bureaucrats: The source of government growth, edited by T. Borcherding. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
Buchanan, James M., and M. R. Flowers. 1980. The public finances: An introductory textbook. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
16.
Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1977. The expanding public sector: Wagner squared. Public Choice31:147-150.
17.
Cameron, David R.1986. The growth of government spending: The Canadian experience in comparative perspective. In State and society: Canada in comparative perspective, edited by Keith Banting. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
18.
Clavet, Michel, François Petry, and Jean-Sébastien Brien. 1999. Comment analyser les données chronologiques pour plan partitionné en sciences sociales. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology61:53-70.
19.
Garand, James C.1988. Explaining government growth in the U.S. states. American Political Science Review82:837-849.
20.
Garand, James C.1989. Measuring government size in the American states: Implications for testing models of government growth. Social Science Quarterly16:405-424.
21.
Garand, James C.1991. Decomposing real and deflator-based government growth: An application to American states. Quality and Quantity29:221-233.
22.
Heller, P.1981. Diverging trends in the share of nominal and real government expenditures in GDP: Implications for policy. National Tax Journal34:61-75.
23.
Holmes, James M., and Patricia A. Hutton. 1990. On the causal relationship between government expenditures and national income. Review of Economics and Statistics72:87-95.
24.
Hood, Christopher. 1991. Stabilization and cutbacks: A catastrophe for government growth theory?Journal of Theoretical Politics3:37-63.
25.
Imbeau, Louis M., and Guy Lachapelle. 1993. Les déterminants des politiques provinciales au Canada: une synthèse des études comparatives. Revue québécoise de science politique23:107-41.
26.
Imbeau, Louis M., François Petry, Jean Crête, and Michel Clavet. Forthcoming. Measuring government growth in the Canadian provinces: Decomposing real growth and deflator effects. Canadian Public Policy.
27.
Kmenta, Jan. 1986. Elements of econometrics. 2d ed.New York: Macmillan.
28.
Larkey, Patrick, C. Stolp, and Mark Winer. 1981. Theorizing about the growth of government: A research assessment. Journal of Public Policy1:157-220.
29.
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and T. Rice. 1985. Government growth in the United States. Journal of Politics47:2-30.
30.
Lowery, David, and William D. Berry. 1983. The growth of government in the United States: An empirical assessment of competing explanations. American Journal of Political Science27:665-694.
31.
McAllister, James. 1989. Do parties make a difference? In Canadian parties in transition, edited by Alain Gagnon and Brian Tanguay, 485-511. Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: Nelson Canada.
32.
Musgrave, R. A.1981. Leviathan cometh—or does he? In Tax and expenditure limits, edited by H. Ladd and N. Tideman. Washington, DC: Urbana Institute.
33.
Musgrave, R. A., and P. B. Musgrave. 1984. Public finance in theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Parks, Richard. 1967. Efficient estimation of a system of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated. Journal of the American Statistical Association62:500-509.
35.
Petry, François, and Howard R. Harmatz. 1994. Test empirique d’explications de l’évolution des dépenses publiques au Canada 1960-1990. Revue québécoise de science politique 25:31-64.
36.
Petry, François, Louis M. Imbeau, Jean Crête, and Michel Clavet. 1999. Electoral and partisan budget cycles in the Canadian provinces. Canadian Journal of Political Science32:273-292.
37.
Reid, Bradford G.1998. Endogenous elections, electoral budget cycles and Canadian provincial governments. Public Choice97:35-48.
38.
Sahni, Balbir, and Balvir Singh. 1984. On the causal directions between national income and government expenditure in Canada. Public Finance39:359-393.
39.
Simeon, Richard, and E. R. Miller. 1980. Regional variations in public policy. In Small worlds: Provinces and parties in Canadian political life, edited by David Elkins and Richard Simeon, 282-284. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Methuen.
40.
Tarschys, Daniel. 1979. The growth of public expenditures: Nine modes of explanation. Scandinavian Political Studies10:9-31.
41.
Tellier, Geneviève, Jean Crête, Louis M. Imbeau, and François Petry. 1997. Les Dépenses publiques et la mesure de leur croissance réelle. Université Laval: Cahier du Laboratoire d’études politiques 97-03.
