This article is an engagement with a piece of Buchanan’s on the ethics of debt default, in which Buchanan proved to be surprisingly sympathetic to debt default as an option. Debt default is a current period transfer from bondholders to taxpayers at large. Default cannot then serve to improve, in aggregate, the lot of the generation whose bequest receipts may have been diminished by the use of debt financing. Current generations of taxpayers may have a legitimate complaint against past generations of voters/taxpayers who used debt financing (and reduced their net bequests thereby), but that past generation is beyond the grave and cannot provide recompense.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brennan, G., and J. M. Buchanan. 1980. The logic of the Ricardian equivalence theorem. Finanzarchiv38:4-16.
2.
Buchanan, J. M.1958. Public principles of public debt. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
3.
Buchanan, J. M.1975. The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Buchanan, J. M.1987. The ethics of debt default. In Deficits, edited by J. M. Buchanan, C. K. Rowley, and R. D. Tollison. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
5.
Buchanan, J. M., C. K. Rowley, and R. T. Tollison, eds. 1987. Deficits. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
6.
Buchanan, J. M., and G. Tullock. 1962. The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Rawls, J.A.1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
