Little is known about the health behaviors of church attendees. This article reviewed telephone interview data of 1,517 women who were church members from 45 churches located in Los Angeles County to determine their breast cancer screening status and to identify the key predictors of screening. Almost all of this sample (96%) reported attending church at least once a month. Key predictors of screening included physician-patient communication, ethnic background, and having medical insurance. Although church-related predictors were not significantly related to screening adherence, the authors compared community-based screening rates from another sample to their sample rates and found that, when controlling for income and education, church members fared better on mammography screening than women who were community residents. This finding suggests that frequent church attendance contributes to better mammography screening status and that the relationship between religious involvement and health behaviors needs further explanation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Altman LK: Breast cancer death rate continues to decline. The New York Times, National Edition, March 8, 1996, p. A17-A17.
2.
2. Goldberg KB, Goldberg P: Breast cancer rate fell 6% for Whites, rose 1% in Blacks, in early 1990s. The Cancer Letter22(19):4-5, 1996.
3.
3. Landis SH, MurrayT, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer statistics, 1998. Ca JClin48:6-29, 1998.
4.
4. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD, Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
5.
5. National Institutes of Health: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49 (NIH Consensus Statement 15[1]). Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, 1997.
6.
6. Leitch AM, Dodd GD, Costanza M, Linver M, Pressman P, McGinnis L, Smith RA: American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: Update 1997. Ca J Clin47(3):150-153, 1997.
7.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Self-reported use of mammography among women aged > 40 years-United States, 1989 and 1995. MMWR46(40):937-941, 1997.
8.
8. Breen N, Kessler L: Changes in the use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health84:62-67, 1994.
9.
9. Breen N, Kessler L: Trends in cancer screening: United States, 1987 and 1992. MMWR45(3):57-61, 1995.
10.
10. Fox SA, Stein JA, Gonzalez RE, Farrenkopf M, Dellinger A: Results of a community trial to increase mammography utilization among Los Angeles Hispanics. J Health Care Poor Underserved9(3):305-317, 1998.
11.
11. Montes JH: Specific cancers affecting Hispanics in the United States, in Jones LA (ed.): Minorities and Cancer. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp. 21-33.
12.
12. Eng E, Hatch J, Callan A: Institutionalizing social support through the church and into the community. Health Educ Q12(1):81-92, 1985.
13.
13. Levin JS: The role of the Black church in community medicine. J Nat Med Assn76:477-483, 1984.
14.
14. National Institutes of Health: Churches as an Avenue to High Blood Pressure Control (NIH Pub. No. 87-2725, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, 1987.
15.
15. Olson LM, Reis J, Murphy L, Gehm JH: The religious community as a partner in health care. J Community Health13:249-257, 1988.
16.
16. Kong BW, Miller JM, Smoot RT: Churches as high blood pressure control centers. J Nat Med Assn74:920-923, 1982.
17.
17. Saunders E, Kong BW: A role for churches in hypertension management. Urban Health12:49-51, 55-55, 1983.
18.
18. Lasater TM, Wells BL, Carleton RA, Elder JP: The role of churches in disease prevention research studies. Public Health Rep101(2):125-131, 1986.
19.
19. Fox SA, Roetzheim RG: Screening mammography and older Hispanic women: Current status and issues. Cancer74(suppl.):2028-2033, 1994.
20.
20. Davis DT, Bustamante A, Brown CP, Wolde-Tsadik G, Savage EW, Cheng X, Howland L: The urban church and cancer control: A source of social influence in minority communities. Public Health Rep109(4):500-506, 1994.
21.
21. Boehm S, Coleman-Bums P, Schlenk EA, Funnel MM, Parzuchowski J, Powell JJ: Prostate cancer in African American men: Increasing knowledge and self-efficacy. J Community Health Nurs12(3):161-169, 1995.
22.
22. Castro FG, Elder J, Coe K, Tafoya-Barraza HM, Moratto S, Campbell N, Talavera G: Mobilizing churches for health promotion in Latino communities: Companeros en la salud. Monogr Nat Cancer Inst18:127-135, 1995.
23.
23. Hatch JW, Jackson C: North Carolina Baptist Church Program. Urban Health10:70-71, 1981.
24.
24. Hatch JW, Lovelace KA: Involving the Southern rural church and students of the health professions in health education. Public Health Rep95:23-25, 1980.
25.
25. Haugk KC: Urban contributions of churches and clergy to community mental health. Comm Mental Health J12:20-28, 1976.
26.
26. Park Ridge Center: Second opinion. Health, Faith, and Ethics, March, 1990, p. 13-13.
27.
27. Braithwaite RL, Lythcott L: Community empowerment as a strategy for health promotion for Black and other minority populations. JAMA261:282-283, 1989.
28.
28. Griffith EE, Young JL, Smith DL: An analysis of the therapeutic elements in a Black church service. Hosp Community Psychiatry35:464-469, 1984.
29.
29. Ford ME, Edwards G, Rodriguez JL, Gibson RC, Tilley BC: An empowerment-centered, church-based asthma education program for African American adults. Health Soc Work21(1):71-75, 1996.
30.
30. Carter Center of Emory University: Striving for Fullness of Life: The Church's Challenge in Health (Occasional Paper Series 1[2]). Atlanta, GA, The Carter Center, 1990.
31.
31. Walls CT, Zarit SH: Informal support from Black churches and the well-being of elderly Blacks. The Gerontologist31(4):490-495, 1991.
32.
32. Comstock GW, Partridge KB: Church attendance and health. J Chronic Diseases25:665-672, 1972.
33.
33. Morrison JD: The Black church as a support system for Black elderly. J Gerontological Soc Work17: 105-120, 1991.
34.
34. Levin JS, Vanderpool HY: Is frequent religious attendance really conducive to better health?Soc Sci Med27:589-600, 1987.
35.
35. Ransdell LB: Church-based health promotion: An untapped resource for women 65 and older. Am J Health Promo9(5):333-336, 1995.
36.
36. Israel BA, Hogue CC, Gorton A: Social networks among elderly women: Implications for health education practice. Health Educ Q10:173-203, 1984.
37.
37. Israel BA: Social networks and social support: Implications for natural helper and community level interventions. Health Educ Q12:65-80, 1985.
38.
38. Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. Sacramento, CA, Cancer Surveillance Section, California Department of Health Services, 1997.
39.
39. Duan N, Fox SA, Pitkin K, Carson S, Stockdale S: Identifying Churchesfor Community-based Mammography Promotion: Lessons from the LAMP Study. Unpublished manuscript, 1998.
40.
40. Pitkin K, Hawes-Dawson J, Fox SA, Maldonado N, Tatum A, Kington R: Dealing with Diversity: Recruiting Churches and Women for a Randomized Trial of Mammography Promotion. Unpublished manuscript, 1998.
41.
41. Zapka J: Executive Summary: Validating Women's Self-Report of Mammogram Experience. Springfield, VA, U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1994.
42.
42. King E, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P: How reliable are mammography self reports?Am J Public Health80:1386-1388, 1990.
43.
43. Burnam MA, Wells KB, Leake B, Landsverk J: Developing of a brief screening instrument for detecting depressive disorders. Med Care26(8):775-789, 1988.
44.
44. Fox SA, Stein JA: Effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care29:1065-1082, 1991.
45.
45. Fox SA, Siu AL, Stein JA: The importance of physician communication on breast-cancer screening of older women. Arch Intern Med154:2058-2068, 1994.
46.
46. White H: A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econimetrica48:817-830, 1980.
47.
47. Huber PJ: The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions, in Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967, pp.221-233.
48.
48. Rubin DB: Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in SurveysNew York, John Wiley, 1987.
49.
49. Vernon S, Vogel V, Halabi S, Jackson G, Lundy R, Peters G: Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer69:165-174, 1992.
50.
50. Zapka J, Hosmer D, Costanza M, Harris D, Stoddard A: Changes in mammography use: Economic, need, and service factors. Am J Public Health82:1345-1351, 1992.
51.
51. Mayer-Oakes SA, Atchison KA, Matthias RE, DeJong FJ, Lubben J, Schweitzer SO: Mammography use in older women with regular physicians: What are the predictors?Am J Prev Med12(1):44-50, 1996.
