The Pathways project studied the relationship of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and culture to breast and cervical cancer screening. A multidisciplinary, multicultural team of investigators assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of women from five race/ethnic groups (N = 4,228) and their barriers to screening utilization. A planning framework guided the development of interventions and analyses of the similarities and differences in screening behaviors across race/ethnic groups. Baseline data for women ages 18 to 74 years showed that levels of screening were higher than national averages for Latina, white, and black women but lower for Chinese and Vietnamese women. Analyses revealed the importance of education and insurance in obtaining recommended screening regardless of race/ethnicity. However, race, ethnicity, and culture are important to the tailoring of effective interventions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
California Department of Health Services:Vital Statistics of California. Sacramento, CA, California Department of Health Services, 1990.
2.
Office of Management of the Budget:Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting (Appendix, Directive No. 15, as adopted on May 12, 1977). Washington, DC, Office of Management of the Budget, 1977.
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: The periodic health examination: 2, 1987 update. Can Med Assoc J138:618–628, 1988.
5.
Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1989.
6.
EddyDM (ed.): Common Screening Tests. Philadelphia, American College of Physicians, 1991.
7.
HaywardRSA, SteinbergEP, FordDE, RoizenMF, RoachKW: Preventive care guidelines: 1991. Ann Intern Med114: 758–783, 1991.
8.
SoxHCJr: Preventive health services in adults. N Engl J Med330: 1589–1595, 1994.
9.
FletcherSW, BlackW, HarrisR, RimerBK, ShapiroS: Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst85: 1644–1656, 1993.
10.
American Cancer Society: The American Cancer Society guidelines for the cancer-related check-up. Cancer42:44–45, 1992.
11.
National Cancer Institute: Working Guidelines for Early Cancer Detection: Rationale and Supporting Evidence to Decrease Mortality. Washington, DC, Early Detection Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, 1987.
12.
HelzlsouerJL: Early detection and prevention of breast cancer, in GreenwaldP, KramerBS, WeedDL (eds.): Cancer Prevention and Control. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1995, pp. 509–535.
13.
EddyDM: Screening for cervical cancer. Ann Intern Med113: 213–226, 1990.
14.
National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control: Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation: 1985-2000 (NIH Pub No. 86-2880). Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 1986.
15.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives (DHHS Publication No. PHS 91-50212). Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.
16.
BreenN, KesslerL: Changes in use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health84: 62–67, 1994.
17.
BaquetC, RingenK: Cancer Among Blacks and Other Minorities: Statistical Profiles (NCI Publication No. 86-2785). Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 1986.
18.
FarleyTA, FlanneryJT: Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: Public health implications. Am J Prev Health79: 1508–1512, 1989.
19.
McWhorterWP, MayerWJ: Black/white differences in type of initial breast cancer treatment and implications for survival. Am J Pub Health77: 1515–1517, 1987.
20.
HowardJ: In-reach: An approach to the secondary prevention of cancer, in ParronDL, SolomonF, JenkinsCD (eds.): Behavior, Health Risks and Social Disadvantage. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1982, pp. 51–61.
21.
BaquetC, RingenK: Health policy: Gaps in access, delivery, and utilization of the Pap smear in the United States. Milbank Q65: 322–347, 1987.
22.
DawsonDA, ThompsonGB: Breast cancer risk factors and screening: United States, 1987. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat10(172): 1–60, 1989.
23.
FoxSA, Klos, DS, TsouCV: Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians. Radiology166: 431–433, 1988.
24.
CusherI, ReadingA, BertizkJ: An Evaluation of Three Interventions Designed to Increase Adherence Among Women With Abnormal Pap Smears. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Public Health Association, Las Vegas, NV, September1986.
25.
FreemanHP: Race, poverty, and cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst83: 526–527, 1991.
26.
RichardsonJL, MarksG, SolisJM: Frequency and adequacy of breast cancer screening among elderly Hispanic women. Prev Med16: 761–774, 1987.
27.
SteinJA, FoxSA, MurataPJ: The influence of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological barriers on use of mammography. J Health Soc Behav32: 101–113, 1991.
28.
WordenJK, MickeyRM, FlynnBS, CostanzaMC, VacekPM, SkellyJM, Lloyd M. LandisDC, MyerDM, NoonanMA: Development of a community breast screening promotion program using baseline data. Prev Med23: 267–275, 1994.
29.
ZapkaJG, CostanzaME, HarrisDR, HosmerD, StoddardA, BarthR, GawV: Impact of a breast cancer screening community intervention. Prev Med22: 34–53, 1993.
30.
FreemanHP: Cancer in the socioeconomically disadvantaged. Cancer39: 266–288, 1989.
31.
BloomJR, HayesWA, SaundersF, FlattS: Cancer awareness and secondary prevention practices of black Americans: Implications for intervention. Fam Comm Health10: 19–30, 1987.
32.
BloomJR, HayesWA, SaundersF, HodgeF: Physician induced and patient induced utilization of early cancer detection practices among black Americans, in AndersonPN, EngstromPF, MortensonLE (eds.): Advances in Cancer Control: Innovations and Research. New York, Alan R. Liss, 1989, pp. 279–296.
33.
SametJM, HuntWC, LerchenML, GoodwinJS: Delay in seeking care for cancer symptoms: A population-based study of elderly New Mexicans. J Natl Cancer Inst80(6): 432–438, 1988.
34.
Pérez-StableEJ, SabogalF, Otero-SabogalR, HiattRA, McPheeSJ: Misconceptions about cancer among Latinos and Anglos. JAMA268: 3219–3223, 1992.
35.
Pérez-StableEJ, Otero-SabogalR, SabogalF, McPheeSJ, HiattRA: Self-reported use of cancer screening tests among Latinos and Anglos in a pre-paid health plan. Arch Int Med154: 1073–1081, 1994.
36.
RamirezAG, McAlisterAL: Mass media campaign—A Su Salud. Prev Med17: 608–621, 1988.
37.
Centers for Disease Control: Behavioral risk factor survey of Vietnamese—California, 1991. MMWR41:69–72, 1992.
38.
PasickRJ, D'onofrioCN, Otero-SabogalR: Similarities and differences across cultures: Questions to inform a third generation for health promotion research. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S142–S161, 1996.
39.
SymeSL: Strategies for health promotion. Prev Med15: 492–507, 1986.
40.
WallackL, WinklebyM: Primary prevention: A new look at basic concepts. Soc Sci Med25: 923–930, 1987.
41.
Pérez-StableEJ, Otero-SabogalR, SabogalF, Nápoles-SpringerA: Pathways to early cancer detection for Latinas:En acción contra el cáncer. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S41–S59, 1996.
42.
McPheeSJ, BirdJA, HaN-T, JenkinsCNH, FordhamD, LeB: Pathways to early cancer detection for Vietnamese women: Suc khoe la vang! (Health is gold!). Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S60–S75, 1996.
43.
EngelstadL, BedeianK, SchorrK, StewartS: Pathways to early detection of cervical cancer for a multiethnic, indigent, emergency department population. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S89–S104, 1996.
44.
LeeM, LeeF, StewartS: Pathways to early breast and cervical detection for Chinese American women. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S76–S88, 1996.
45.
GreenL, KreuterMW: Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA, Mayfield, 1991.
46.
WalshJME, McPheeSJ: A systems model of clinical preventive care: An analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Educ Q19: 157–175, 1992.
47.
CurrySJ, EmmonsKM: Theoretical models for predicting and improving compliance with breast cancer screening. Ann Behav Med16(4): 302–316, 1994.
48.
PasickRJ: Socioeconomic and cultural factors in the development and use of theory, in GlanzK, LewisFM, RimerBK (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, in press.
49.
Pérez-StableEJ, MarinBV, MarinG: A comprehensive smoking cessation program for the San Francisco Bay Area Latino community: Program Latino Para Dejar de Fumar. Am J Health Prom7: 430–475, 1993.
50.
JenkinsCNH, McPheeSJ, BirdJA, BonillaN-T: Cancer risks and prevention behaviors among Vietnamese refugees. West J Med153: 34–39, 1990.
51.
HognessCG, EngelstadLP, LinckLM, SchorrKA: Cervical cancer screening in an urban emergency department. Ann Emerg Med21: 933–939, 1992.
52.
PasickRJ, SabogalF, BirdJA, D'onofrioCN, JenkinsCNH, LeeM, EngelstadL, HiattRA: Problems and progress in translation of health survey questions: The Pathways experience. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S28–S40, 1996.
53.
GrovesRM, KahnRL: Surveys by Telephone: A National Comparison With Personal Interviews. New York, Academic Press, 1979.
54.
BirdJA, Otero-SabogalR, HaN-T, McPheeSJ: Tailoring lay health worker interventions for diverse cultures: Lessons learned from Vietnamese and Latina communities. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S105–S122, 1996.
55.
SabogalF, Otero-SabogalR, PasickRJ, JenkinsCNH, Pérez-StableEJ: Printed health education materials for diverse communities: Suggestions learned from the field. Health Educ Q23(suppl.):S123–S141, 1996.
56.
CampellDT, StanleyJC: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, Rand McNally College, 1963.
57.
MurrayDM, JacobsDR, PerryCL: A statewide approach to adolescent tobacco use prevention: The Minnesota-Wisconsin adolescent tobacco-use research project. Prev Med17: 461–474, 1988.
58.
MurrayDM, McKinlaySM, MartinD, DonnerAP, DwyerJH, RaudenbushSW, GraubardBI: Design and analysis issues in community trials. Eval Rev18: 493–513, 1994.
59.
COMMIT Research Group: Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year comunity intervention. AM J Public Health85:183–192, 1995.
60.
CarletonRA, LasaterTM, AssafA, LefebvreRC, McKinlaySM: The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: I. An experiment in population-based disease prevention. Rhode Island Med J70: 533–538, 1987.
61.
AssafA, BanspachSW, LasaterTM, McKinlaySM, CarletonRA: The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: II. Evaluation strategies. Rhode Island Med J70: 541–546, 1987.
62.
GordonNP, HiattRA, LampertDI: Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst85: 566–570, 1993.
63.
HiattRA, Pérez-StableEJ, Quesenberry CP Jr, SabogalF, Otero-SabogalR, McPheeSJ: Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits in Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic white health plan members in Northern California. Prev Med24: 278–285, 1995.
64.
KingES, RimerBK, TrockB, BalshemA, EngstromP: How valid are mammography self-reports?Am J Public Health80: 1386–1388, 1990.
65.
HiattRA, PasickRJ: Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: Focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat40: 37–51, 1996.
