This article discusses the beneficial effects of setting goals in health behavior change and maintenance interventions. Goal setting theory predicts that, under certain conditions, setting specific difficult goals leads to higher performance when compared with no goals or vague, nonquantitative goals, such as "do your best." In contrast to the graduated, easy goals often set in health behavior change programs, goal setting theory asserts a positive linear relationship between degree of goal difficulty and level of performance. Research on goal setting has typically been conducted in organizational and laboratory settings. Although goal setting procedures are used in many health behavior change programs, they rarely have been the focus of systematic research. Therefore, many research questions still need to be answered regarding goal setting in the context of health behavior change. Finally, initial recommendations for the successful integration of goal setting theory in health behavior change programs are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1986.
2.
Locke EA, Latham GP: A Theory of Goal Setting and Perfonnance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1990.
3.
Mento AJ, Steel RP, Karren RJ: A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984. Organ Behav Human Dec Proc39:52-83, 1987.
4.
Tubbs ME: Goal-setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. J Appl Psychol71:474-483, 1986.
5.
Lee TW, Locke EA, Latham GP: Goal setting theory and job performance, in Pervin L (ed.): Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989.
6.
Latham GP, Locke EA: Self regulation through goal setting. Org Behav Human Dec Proc50:212-247,1991.
7.
Cervone D., Jiwani N., Wood R.: Goal setting and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on complex decision-making and performance. J Pers Soc Psychol61:257-266, 1991.
8.
Wood R., Mento AJ, Locke EA: Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. JAppl Psychol72:416-425, 1987.
9.
Locke EA, Frederick E., Lee C., Bobko P.: Effect of self-efficacy, goals and task strategies on task performance. JAppl Psychol69:241-254,1984.
10.
Erez M., Zidon I.: Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance . J Appl Psychol79:69-78, 1984.
11.
Kanfer R., Ackerman PL: Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative /aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. JAppl Psychol74:657-690, 1989.
12.
Weiner B.: An Attributional Theory ofmotivation and Emotion. New York , Springer-Verlag,1986.
13.
Hospers HJ, Kok GJ, Strecher V.: Attributions for previous failures and subsequent outcomes in a weight reduction program. Health Educ Q17:409-415, 1990.
14.
Den Boer DJ: Attribution and Reattribution. An Examination of the Ideas Underlying Reattribution Practice. Doctoral dissertation thesis, University of Limburg , Maastricht, the Netherlands, 1992 .
Stock J., Cervone D.: Proximal goal setting and self-regulatory processes. Cog Theory Res14:483-498, 1990.
17.
Bandura A., Schunk DH: Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol41:586-598, 1981.
18.
Bandura A., Wood R.: Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision-making. J Pers Soc Psychol56:805-814, 1989.
19.
Campion MA, Lord RG: A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process . Org Behav Human Perf30:265-287, 1982.
20.
Kernan MC, Lord RG: Effects of participative vs. assigned goals and feedback in a multitrial task . Motivation and Emotion12:75-86, 1988.
21.
Lord RG, Hanges PJ: A control system model of organizational motivation: Theoretical development and applied implications. Behav Sci32:161-178, 1987.
22.
Tesser A., Campbell J., Smith M.: Friendship choice and performance: Self-evaluation maintenance in children . JPers Soc Psychol46:561-574, 1984.
23.
Earley PC, Connolly T., Ekegren G.: Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. JAppl Psychol74:24-33, 1989.
24.
Wood R., Bandura A.: Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision-making. J Pers Soc Psychol56:407-415, 1989.
25.
Wood R., Bandura A., Bailey T.: Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments. Org Behav Human Dec Proc46:181-201, 1990.
26.
Cervone D., Peake PK: Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgemental heuristics on self-efficacy judgements and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol50:492-501, 1986.
27.
Bandura A., Cervone D.: Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation . Org Behav Human Dec Proc38:92-113, 1986.
28.
Latham GP, Erez M., Locke EA: Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. J Appl Psychol73:753-772, 1988.
29.
Alexy B.: Goal-setting and health reduction. Nurs Res34:283-288, 1985.
30.
Erez M., Arad R.: Participative goal-setting: Social, motivational and cognitive factors. JAppl Psychol71:591-597, 1986.
31.
Latham GP, Mitchell TR, Dossett DL: Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. J Appl Psychol63:163-171, 1978.
32.
Bandura A., Jourden F.: Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol60.941-951, 1991.
33.
Elliot ES, Dweck CS: Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol54:5-12, 1988.
34.
Mahoney MJ: Self-reward and self-monitoring techniques for weight control. Behav Therapy5:48-57,1974.
35.
Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Grothaus LC: Evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation interventions with a self-help smoking cessation program. J Consult Clin Psychol59:318-324, 1991.
36.
Klesges RC, Vasey M., Glasgow RE: A workplace smoking modification competition: Potential for public health impact. Am J Pub Health76:198-200,1986.
37.
Reber RA, Wallin JA: The effects of training, goal setting and knowledge on safe behavior: A component analysis. Acad Management J27:544-560, 1984.
38.
Schafer LC, Glasgow RE, McCaul KD: Increasing the adherence of diabetic adolescents. J Behav Med5:353-362, 1982.
39.
Epstein LH, Wing RR, Koeske R., Ossip D., Beck S.: A comparison of lifestyle change and programmed aerobic exercise on weight and fitness changes in obese children. Behav Therapy13:651-665, 1982.
40.
Martin JE, Dubbert PM, Katell AD, Thompson JK, Raczynski JR, Lake M., Smith PO, Webster JS, Sikora T., Cohen RE: Behavioral control of exercise in sedentary adults: Studies 1 through 6. J Consult Clin Psychol52:795-811, 1984.
41.
BanduraA., Simon KM: The role of proximal intentions in self-regulation of refractory behavior . Cog Therapy Res1:177-193,1977.
42.
Baron P., Watters RG: Effects of goal-setting and goal levels on weight loss induced by self-monitoring. Int RevAppl Psychol31:369-382,1982.
43.
Dubbert PM, Wilson GT: Goal-setting and spouse involvement in the treatment of obesity. Behav Res Therapy22:227-242, 1984.
44.
Kincey J.: Compliance with a behavioral weight-loss programme: Target setting and locus of control. Behav Res Therapy21: 109-114, 1983.
45.
Zegman M., Baker B.: The influence of proximal vs. distal goals on adherence to prescribed calories . Addict Behav8:319-322,1983.
46.
Strecher VJ, Bulger DW: Improving Health-Related Behavior Change Through Goal-Setting Strategies. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association Meetings , Washington, DC, October, 1994.
47.
Skinner CS, Siegfried J., Kegler M., Strecher VJ: The potential of computers in patient education. Patient Educ Counsel22:27-34, 1993.
