The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to a group of working women's decision related to mammography. The study was guided by a decision model called the Multiattribute Utility Model. Exploratory interviews were conducted among 36 women to identify positive and negative factors associated with the mammography decision. Eighteen factors emerged and were categorized into three broad areas: Knowledge and Attitudes (Confidence in Efficacy, Personal Risk, Other Means of Knowing, Fear of Cancer/ Treatment, Belief in Fate, Embarrassment), Issues Related to Participation (Accessibility and Convenience, Difficulty Arranging, Time, Cost, Pain, Radiation), and Social Concerns (Role Model, Responsibility to Self, Responsibility to Others, Family/Friends' Influence, Societal Influences, Health Care Providers' Influence). This information served as the basis of a survey among 87 women to determine the importance of these factors. Seven factors emerged as significantly different between compliers and noncompliers. In order of significance, they were Difficulty Arranging, Fear of Cancer/Treatment, Cost, Accessibility and Convenience, Time, Other Means of Knowing, and Influence of Health Care Provider. The predictive validity of this analysis was 85%. Implications of findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Jenks S.: ACS keeps mammography guidelines for women under 50. J Natl Cancer Inst85(5):348-349, 1993.
2.
Miller AB: The costs and benefits of breast cancer screening. Am J Prev Med9(3):175-180, 1993.
3.
Nystrom L., Rutqvist LE, Wall S., Lindgren A., Lindqvist M., Ryden S., Andersson I., Bjurstam N., Fagerberg G., Frissell J., Tabar L., Larsson L.: Breast cancer screening with mammography: Overview of Swedish randomised trials . Lancet341(8851):973-978, 1993.
4.
Feig SA, Hendrick, RE: Risk, benefit, and controversies in mammographic screening. RSNA categorical course in physics119-135, 1993.
5.
Dodd GD: Screening for breast cancer. Cancer72(3):1038-1042.
6.
Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P., Venet L.: Periodic Screening for Breast Cancer: The Health Insurance Plan and Its Sequelae 1963-1986. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Press, 1988.
7.
Tabar L., Gad A., Holmberg H., Ljungquist U., Fagerberg C., Baldetorp L., Grontoft O., Manson J.: Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography . Lancet1:829-832, 1985.
8.
Baker LH: Breast cancer demonstration project: Five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin32(4):194-225, 1982.
9.
Bassett LW, Manjikian V., Gold RH: Mammography and breast cancer screening. Surg Clin North Am70(4):775-788, 1990.
10.
Leis P., Hewitt JC, Greene FL, Haynes JL: The war on breast cancer: Prevention and early detection. Female Patient13:57-62, 1988.
11.
Chu KC, Smart CR, Tarone RE: Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the health insurance plan clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst80:1125-1132, 1988.
12.
Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U., Willett W.: Breast cancer: (Third of three parts. N Engl J Med327(7):473-480, 1992.
13.
United States Department of Health and Human Services: Vital and Health Statistics: Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Screening: United States, 1987. Series 10: Data from the National Health Interview Survey. (DHHS Publication No. [PHS] 90-1500). Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.
14.
United States Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. (DHHS Publication No. [PHS] 91-50212. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.
15.
United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics: The American Workforce. Washington, DC, 1994.
16.
Irwig L., Cockburn J., Turnbull D., Simpson J., Mock P., Tattersall M.: Women's perceptions of screening mammography. Aust J Public Health15(1):24-32, 1991.
Bastini R., Marcus AC, Hollatz-Brown A.: Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: A Los Angelas county survey . Prev Med20:350-363, 1991.
19.
Lerman C., Rimer B., Trock B., Balshem A., Engstrom PF: Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening . Prev Med19:279-290, 1990.
20.
Fulton JP, Buechner JS, Scott HD, DeBuono BA, Feldman JP, Smith RA, Kovenock D.: A study guided by the health belief model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older. Public Health Rep106(4):410-420, 1991.
21.
Frazier TG, Cummings PD: Motivational factors for participation in breast cancer screening . J Cancer Educ5(1):51-54, 1990.
22.
Montano DE, Taplin SH: A test of an expanded theory of reasoned action to predict mammography participation . Soc Sci Med32:733-741, 1991.
23.
Baines CJ, To T., Wall C.: Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the national breast screening study. Cancer65:1663-1669, 1990 .
24.
Ruda PA, Bourcier FM, Skiff D.: Health beliefs of senior college students regarding breast cancer and breast self-examination. Health Care for Women International13:33-41, 1992.
25.
Mamon JA, Zapka JG: Breast self-examination by young women. I. Characteristics associated with frequency. Am J Prev Med2:61-69, 1986.
26.
McLelland R. : Screening for breast cancer: Opportunities, status, and challenges. Recent Results Cancer Res119:29-38, 1990.
27.
Richardson A.: Factors likely to affect participation in mammographic screening. N Z Med J103(887):155-156, April 11, 1990.
Schecter C. , Vanchieri CF, Crofton C.: Evaluating women's attitudes and perceptions in developing mammography promotion messages. Public Health Rep105(3):253-257, 1990.
30.
Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, Greene HL: Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors . Am J Public Health79:1499-1502, 1989 .
31.
Taplin SH, Montano DE: Attitudes, age, and participation in mammogrpahic screening: A prospective analysis. J Am Board Fam Pract6:13-23, 1993.
32.
Taplin S., Anderman C., Grothaus L.: Breast cancer riak and participation in mammographic screening. Am J Public Health79:1494-1497, 1989 .
33.
Gregorio DI , Kegeles S., Partker C., Benn S.: Encouraging screening mammograms: Results of the 1988 Connecticut breast cancer detection awareness campaign. Conn Med54(7):370-373, 1990.
34.
Edwards W.: The theory of decision making. Psychol Bull52:380-417, 1954.
35.
Beach LR, Campbell FL, Townes BD: Subjective expected utility and the prediction of birth planning decisions . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance24:18-28, 1979.
36.
Carter WB, Beach LR, Inui TS: The flu shot study: Using multiattribute utility theory to design a vaccination intervention. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance38:378-391, 1986.
37.
Paskett ED, Carter WB, Chu J., White E.: Compliance behavior in women testing a decision model. Med Care28(7):643-652,1990.
38.
Salazar MK, Carter WB: Evaluation of breast self-examination beliefs using a decision model . West J Nurs Res15(4):403-421, 1993.
39.
Beach LR, Mai-Dalton R., Marshall M., Beach BH: The METRO Study: A closer look at mispredicted decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance28:50-61, 1981.
40.
Beach LR, Townes BD, Campbell FL, Keating GW: Developing and testing a decision aid for birth planning decisions . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance15:99-116, 1976.
41.
Ajzen I., Fishbein M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1980.
42.
Rosenstock IM : The Health Belief Model: Explaining health behavior through expectancies, in Glanz K , Lewis F, Rimer BK (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990, pp. 39-62.
43.
Seidel JV, Kjolseth R., Seymour E.: The Ethnograph: A Program for the Computer Assisted Analysis of Text Based Data. Corvallis, OR, Qualis Research Associates, 1988.
44.
Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, Miller DG: Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst84(1):24-30, 1992.
45.
Lerman C., Trock B., Rimer BK, Boyce A., Jepson C., Engstrom PF: Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med114:657-661, 1991.
46.
Janis JL: Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research, in Berkowitz L (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 3). New York, Academic Press, 1967.
47.
Leventhal H.: Findings and theory in the study of fear communication, in Berkowitz L (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 5). New York, Academic Press, 1970.
48.
Rogers RW: A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change . J Psychol91:93-114,1975.
49.
Tanner JF, Hunt JB, Eppright DR: The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals . J Marketing55:36-45, 1991.
50.
Rippetoe PA , Rogers RW: Effects of components of protection-motivstion theory on adaptive and mapadaptive coping with a health threat. J Pers Soc Psychol52(3):596-604, 1987.
51.
Rogers RW, Mewborn CR: Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responses. J Pers Soc Psychol34:54-61, 1976.
52.
Grady KE, Lemkau JP, McVay JM, Reisine ST: The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women. Prev Med21:766-780, 1992.
53.
Fox SA, Stein JA: The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care29(11):1065-1081, 1991.
54.
Rimer BK, Trock B., Engstrom PF, Lerman C., King E.: Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med7(2):69-74,1991.
55.
Kopans DB, Feig SA: The national breast screening study: A critical review. AJR161:755-760, 1993.
56.
Smart CR, Hartman WH, Beahrs OH, Garfinkel L.: Insights into breast cancer screening of younger women. Cancer72(4):1449-1456, 1993 .
57.
Tabar L., Duffy SW, Burhenne LW: New Swedish breast cancer detection results for women aged 40-49. Cancer72(4):1437-1448, 1993 .
