This paper illustrates the utility of theory for health educators who advocate for health promotion policies and programs. It describes how diffusion of innovation and other social science theories were employed by a statewide coalition called the Health Pro motion and Education Council of Virginia in its effort to reduce premature and pre ventable death and disability in the state. To this end the Council sought legislative action to accelerate the diffusion of health promotion throughout the state. Discussing elements of diffusion theory such as working through opinion leaders, creating information-ex change relationships, and tailoring the attributes of the innovation to achieve its objec tives, the paper reviews the process through which the Council became an effective advocate, and the strategies it devised to communicate the innovation of health promotion to legislators. The legislation that was generated by the work of the legislative study committee and future uses of theory are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Nyswander D. : The open society: Its implications for health educators. Health Educ Monogr22:3-15, 1967.
2.
World Health Organization: Working Group on Health Promotion in Developing Countries: A call for action: Promoting health in developing countries. Health Educ Q18:5-15, 1991.
3.
Minkler M.: Health education, health promotion and the open society: An historical perspective . Health Educ Q16(1):17-30, 1989.
4.
Chin R.: The utility of system models and developmental models for practitioners , in Bennis WG, Benne KD, Chin R, Corey KE (eds.); The Planning of Change (3rd ed.). New York, NY, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976, pp. 90-117.
5.
Glanz K., Lewis FM, Rimer BK: Theory, research, and practice in health education: Building bridges and forging links, in Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds.); Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990, pp. 17-32.
6.
Bandura A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1986.
7.
Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF: Communication of Innovations (2nd ed.). New York, NY, The Free Press, 1971 .
8.
Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY, The Free Press, 1983 .
9.
House Joint Resolution No. 129: Expressing the interest of the General Assembly in greater efforts in consumer health education. Richmond, VA, The General Assembly of Virginia, 1972.
10.
"Virginia Prospers" 1990General Assembly Fact Sheet. Richmond, Va, Health Promotion and Education Council of Virginia, Fall 1989.
11.
Virginia Department of Health: Virginia's Health Risks—1989. Richmond, VA , Division of Chronic Disease Control, 1989.
12.
Thar W.: Population Attributable Risk. East Millstone, NJExxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc.08875-2350, 1985 .
13.
U.S. Dhew: Healthy People: The Surgeon General's Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. DHEW (PHS) 79-55071. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
14.
Chin R., Benne KD: General strategies for effecting changes in human systems, in Bennis WG, Benne KD, Chin R, Corey KE (eds.); The Planning of Change (3rd ed.). New York, NY, Holt, Rinehart and Winston , 1976, pp. 22-45.
15.
Cottrell L.: The competent community, in Kaplan BH, Wilson RH, Leighton AH (eds.); Further Explorations in Social Psychiatry . New York, NY, Basic Books, 1976, pp. 195-209.
16.
Green LW, Kreuter MW, Deeds SG, Partridge KB: Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach. Palo Alto, CA, Mayfield Publishing Company, 1980.
17.
Kar SB: Implications of diffusion research for a planned change. Int J Health Educ17:192-200, 1974.
18.
Adelman MB, Parks MR, Albrecht TL: Beyond close relationships: Support in weak ties, in Albrecht TL, Adelman MB (eds.); Communicating Social Support. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, Inc., 1987 , pp. 126-147.
19.
House Joint Resolution No. 179: Studying means of reducing preventable death and disability in the Commonwealth and examining the feasibility of implementing a comprehensive prevention plan in Virginia. Richmond, VA, The General Assembly of Virginia, 1990.
20.
Strecher VJ , DeVellis BM, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM: The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Q13:73-91, 1986.
21.
Duryea EJ, Ransom MV, English G.: Psychological immunization: Theory, research, and current health behavior applications. Health Educ Q17:169-178, 1990.
22.
Goodman R., Steckler A.: A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programs . Fam Community Health11(4):63-78, 1989.
Novelli W.: Applying social marketing to health promotion and disease prevention , in Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds.); Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Publishers , 1990, pp. 342-369.
25.
Orlandi M.: The diffusion and adoption of worksite health promotion innovations: An analysis of barriers. Prev Med15:522-536, 1986.
26.
Howze E.: "Virginia Prospers": A legislative initiative to promote health for all Virginians. Virginia J12:23, 27-28, 1989.
27.
House Document No. 58: Report of the joint subcommittee on studying means of reducing preventable death and disability in the Commonwealth and examining the Feasibility of Implementing a comprehensive prevention plan in Virginia. Richmond, VA, Commonwealth of Virginia.
28.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research . New York, NY, Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.
29.
Kaplan A.: The Conduct of Inguiry. San Francisco, CA, Chandler Publishing Company, 1964.
30.
Anderson RE, Carter I.: Human Behavior in the Social Environment: A Social Systems Approach (3rd ed.). New York, NY, Aldine Publishing Company, 1984.
