In an overall framework uniting program planning and evaluation, process evalua tion can assist community-based health promotion programs in establishing participa tion objectives, monitoring their achievement and the quality of interventions used, and translating these into useful information for managing and developing programs. This research reports on efforts by the Minnesota Heart Health Program to develop a system that permitted tracking educational program contacts, its implementation, and its use to make management decisions about program activities. The system was devel oped as part of a planning and evaluation framework with specific criteria for develop ing and tracking educational programs drawn from the social-learning literature. Over all, the system helped to make participation objectives more concrete, aided decision making about allocation of personnel and material resources, and encouraged the development of innovative programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Windsor RA, Baranowski T., Clark N., Cutter, G.: Evaluation of Health Promotion and Education Programs. Palo Alto, CA, Mayfield, 1984, p. 3.
2.
Cook TD, Reichert CS: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1982.
3.
Hollister RG, Kemper P., Woolridge J.: Linking process and impact analysis: The case of supported work, in Reichert CS, and Cook TD (eds), Beyond Qualitative vs. Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage , 1979.
4.
Lewin K.: Action research and minority problems, in Lewin GW (ed), Resolving Social Conflicts. New York, Harper, 1948.
5.
Loken B., Swim J., Mittelmark M.: Social psychological theories applied to the Minnesota Heart Health Program , in Edwards J, Bryant F, and Heath L: Applied Social Psychology Annual. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, in press.
6.
Flay B., Cook T.: Evaluation of mass media prevention campaigns, in Rice RE, Paisley W (eds): Public Communication Campaigns. Beverly Hills, Sage, 1981, pp. 239-64.
7.
Flora J., Fortmann SP, Maccoby N., Farquhar J.: Application of a Social Marketing Framework to Electronic Media Planning for Community Health Education. Paper presented at the annual convention, Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy (AABT), Philadelphia, 1984.
8.
Fortmann S., Williams P., Hulley S., Maccoby N., Farquhar J.: Does dietary health education reach only the privileged? The Stanford Three Community Study. Circulation66:77-82, 1982.
9.
Maccoby N., Solomon DS: Heart disease prevention: Community studies, in Rice RE, Paisley W (eds.), Public Communication CampaignsBeverly Hills, Sage, 1981, 105-26.
10.
Mittelmark M., Luepker RV, Jacobs D., Bracht N., Carlaw R., Crow R., Pechacek T., Perry CP, Pirie PL, Blackburn HB: Community-wide prevention of cardiovascular disease: Education strategies of the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Preventive Medicine15:1-17, 1986.
11.
Puska P., Salonen JT, Tuomilehto J., Nissinen A., Kottke TE: Evaluating community-based preventive cardiovascular programs: Problems and experiences from the North Karelia Project. Journal of Community Health9:49-63, 1983.
12.
Flora J., Goode LT, Farquhar JW: Process Evaluations in Public Communications Campaigns: A Model from the Stanford Heart Disease Prevention Program. Stanford University: unpublished manuscript, 1987.
13.
Fox K., and Kotler P.: The marketing of social causes: The first ten years. Journal of Marketing44: 34-33, 1980.
14.
Frederiksen LW , Solomon LJ, Brehony KA: Marketing Health Behavior: Principles, Techniques and Applications. New York, Plenum Press, 1984.
15.
Blackburn HB : Research and demonstration projects in community cardiovascular disease prevention. Journal of Public Health Policy4:398-421, 1983.
16.
Jacobs D., Luepker RV, Mittelmark M., Folsom AR, Pirie PP, Mascioli SR, Hannan PJ, Pechacek TF, Bracht NF, Carlaw RW, Kline FG, Blackburn H.: Community-wide prevention strategies: Evaluation design of the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Journal of Chronic Disease39:775-788, 1986.
17.
Farquhar J., Fortmann S., Maccoby N., Haskell W., Williams P., Flora J., Taylor CB, Brown BW, Solomon DS, Hulley S.: The Stanford Five-City project: Design and methods. American Journal of Epidemiology122:323-334, 1985.
18.
Elder JP, Hovell MF, Lasater TM, Wells BL, Carleton RA: Applications of behavior modification to community health education: the case of heart disease prevention. Health Education Quarterly12:151-168, 1985.
19.
Kotler P.: Social marketing of health behavior, in Brehony KA, Frederiksen LW, Solomon LJ (eds.), Marketing Health Behavior: Principles, Techniques, and Applications . New York, Plenum Press, 1984, pp. 23-39.
20.
Wallack L.: Social marketing as prevention: Uncovering some critical assumptions. Advances in Consumer Research11:682-687, 1984.
21.
Mayer RR: Social Planning and Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ , Prentice-Hall, 1972.
22.
Reeves PN, Bergwall DF, Woodside NB: Introduction to Health Planning. 3rd edition. Virginia, Information Resources Press, 1984.
23.
Rifkin SB: Health Planning and Community Participation: Case Studies in South-east Asia . Australia, Croom Helm, Ltd, 1985.
24.
Twain D.: Creating Change in Social Settings: Planned Program Development. New York, Praeger, 1983.
25.
Zaltman G., and Duncan R.: Strategies for Planned Change. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
26.
Archer SE, Kelly CD, Bisch, SA: Implementing Change in Communities: A Collaborative Process. Missouri, C. V. Mosby Company, 1984 .
27.
Blum HL: Planning for Health: Generics for the Eighties. New York , Human Sciences Press, 1981.
28.
Robertson LS : The great seatbelt campaign flop. Journal of Communication26: pp. 41-45, 1976.
29.
Maccoby N., Farquhar J., Wood P., Alexander JK: Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease: Effects of a community-based campaign on knowledge and behavior. Journal of Community Health , 3:100-114, 1977.
30.
Wallack L.: Mass media campaigns: The odds against finding behavior change. Health Education Quarterly, 8:209-260, 1981.
31.
Froberg D., Williams C., Mate NV: Project Mental Health: A case study of a mass media health promotion program . Health Education Research: Theory and Practice1:315-323, 1986.
32.
Bandura A.: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84:191-215, 1977.
33.
Bandura A.: Social-learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1977.
34.
Elmore JG, Taylor CB, Flora JA, Williams P., Hafferty F., Fortmann SP, Farquhar JW: The Effects of Self-Directed Nutrition Education in a Community Sample. Paper presented the national convention of the American Public Health Association, Anaheim, CA, 1984 .
35.
Schunk DH, Carbonari JP: Self-efficacy models, in Matarazzo J, Weiss C, Herd JA, Miller N, and Weiss S (eds.): Behavioral Health: A Handbook of Health Enhancement and Disease Prevention. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1984 .
36.
Johnson DW, Johnson RT: Nutrition education: A model for effectiveness, a synthesis of research. Journal of Nutrition Education Supplement17:1-27, 1985.
37.
Hammer M.: Core and extended social networks in relation to health and illness. Social Science and Medicine17:405-411, 1983.
38.
Maida CS: Social Support and learning preventive health care. Social Science and Medicine21:335-339, 1985.
39.
Rook KS: Promoting social bonding: Strategies for helping the lonely and socially isolated . American Psychologist39:1389-1407, 1984 .
40.
Schafer C.: The health-related function of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine4:381, 1981.
41.
Seeman M., et al.: Social networks and health status: A longitudinal analysis . Social Psychology Quarterly48:237-248, 1985.
42.
Ward RA: Informal networks and well-being in later life: A research agenda. Gerontologist, 25:55-61, 1985.
