How can health educators influence public policy so as to increase the resources for disease prevention? The following case history of the New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning (NYCCELP) describes how an advocacy group sought to educate parents, health workers and policy makers about a major urban health problem. Using health education techniques such as small group meetings, mass media coverage and community organizing, NYCCELP hoped to persuade city agencies to enforce more systematically existing laws for the prevention of lead poisoning and to allocate more resources for screening and education. By defining the problem of lead poisoning broadly, the Coalition was able to attract diverse constituencies including housing organizations, public health advocacy groups, public interest lawyers, elected officials and children's rights groups. In part as a result of NYCCELP's efforts, the city govern ment has screened more children for lead poisoning, hired additional health educators, enforced relevant sections of the housing code more often, and allocated new re sources for lead poisoning control.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Public Health Service/National Center for Health Statistics, Blood Lead Levels for Persons Ages 6 Months to 74 Years: United States, 1976-1980. Data from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 11), Series 11, No. 233, p. 2.
2.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Public Health Service/Centers for Disease Control, Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children, January 1985.
3.
Office of the Controller. A Silent Epidemic: Childhood Lead Poisoning. Office of Policy Management, City of New York, September 1986.
4.
Needleman HL , Gunnoe C., Leviton A., et al.: Deficits in psychological and classroom performance of children with elevated dentive lead levels. N. Eng. J. Med., 300:689-695, 1979.
5.
Winneke G., Kramer U., Brockhaus A., et al.: Neuropsychological studies in children with elevated tooth lead concentrations: Extended study. Int. Arch Occup. and Environ. Health, 51:232, 1983.
6.
Yule W., Lansdown R., Millar IB, et al.: The relationship between blood lead concentrations, intelligence and attainment in a school age population: A Pilot Study. Div. Med. Child Neurol, 23:567-576, 1981.
7.
Rutter M.: Low level lead exposure: Sources, effects and implications. In: Rutter, M, Jones, RR (Eds), Lead Versus Health: Sources and Effects of Low Level Lead Exposure . New York: John Wiley & Sons , 333-370, 1982.
8.
Provenzano G.: "The social costs of excessive lead exposure during childhood", Low Level Lead Exposure: The Clinical Implications of Current Research, H. L. Needleman, Ed. New York: Raven Press, 1980.
9.
National Academy of Sciences.Lead in the Human Environment, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1980.
10.
Comptroller General of the United States.HUD Not Fulfilling Responsibility to Eliminate Lead-Based Paint Hazard in Federal Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office, CD-81-31, 1980, p. 3.
11.
Sayre JW, et al.: House and hand dust as a potential source in childhood lead exposure. Am. J. Disease Child, 127:167-170, 1974.
12.
Baritrop D. , Meek F.: Effect of particle size on lead absorption from the gut. Arch. Environ. Health, 34:280-285, 1979.
13.
Annest J., Mahaffey KR, et al.: Blood lead levels for persons 6 months - 74 years of age: U.S. 1976-1980. Vital and Health Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, No. 79, 1982.
14.
New York City Department of Health, Bureau of Lead Poisoning Control Annual Report - 1985, p. 20.
15.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Promoting Health/Preventing Disease: Objectives for the Nation. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980, p. 34.
16.
Rosner D., Markowitz G.: A gift of god?: The public health controversy over leaded gasoline during the 1920's. Amer J Pub. Health, 75:344-352, 1985.
17.
Gordon D.: City Limits: Barriers to Change in Urban Government. New York: Charterhouse, 1973, p. 19.
18.
Gordon D.: City Limits: Barriers to Change in Urban Government. New York: Charterhouse, 1973, p. 28.
19.
Gordon D.: City Limits: Barriers to Change in Urban Government. New York: Charterhouse, 1973, p. 44.
20.
Mahaffey, KR , et al.: National estimates of blood lead levels: United States 1976-1980: Association with selected demographic and socioeconomic factors. New Eng. J. of Med., 307:573-579, 1982.
21.
Eidevold G. , Mustalish H., Novick L.: The New York City Department of Health: Lessons in lead poisoning control program. Am. J. Pub. Health., 64:956-962, 1974.
22.
Letter to New York City Medical Providers from New York City Commissioner of Health David Sencer, Undated (1983).
23.
New York City Department of Health, Bureau of Lead Poisoning Control, Annual Report1982.
24.
Unpublished data from New York City Health and Hospital Corporation.
25.
New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning. The Problem That Hasn't Gone A way: Childhood Lead Poisoning in New York City, March 1984.
26.
Imperato PJ : The effect of New York City's fiscal crisis on the department of health. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 54:276-281, 1978.
27.
Nestlebaum Z.; The fall and fall of the New York City department of health. Health PAC Bulletin.81-2:5-16, 1979.
28.
Newfield J. and DuBrul P.: The Permanent Government: Who Really Rules New York? New York: Pilgrim Press, 1981, pp. 248-262.
29.
New York City Department of Health.Bureau of Lead Poisoning Control. Annual Report1985.
30.
Simonds S.: Health education: Facing issues of policy, ethics and social justice. Health Education Monographs.6(Suppl 2):18-27, 1978.
31.
Steckler A. and Dawson L.: The role of health education in public policy development. Health Ed. Quarterly, 9(4):275-292, 1982.
32.
Maccoby N. et al.: Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease: Effects of a community-based campaign on knowledge and behavior. Journal of Community Health , 3:110-114, 1977.
33.
Lau R., et al.: Channeling health: A review of televised health campaigns. Health Education Quarterly, 7(1):56-89, 1980.
34.
Wallack L.: Mass Media campaigns: The odds against finding behavior change. Health Education Quarterly, 8(3):209-260, 1981.
35.
Udry JR, et al.: Can mass media advertising increase contraceptive use? Family Planning Perspectives, 4(3):37-44, 1972.
36.
McCombs M. and Shaw D.: The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36:176-187, 1972.
37.
Tuchman G.: Making News. New York: Free Press , 1978.
