Health communications campaigns are a major strategy used by governments to promote health. This article discusses key issues in the ethics of health communica tions campaigns, including the compatibility of health campaigns with the principle of respect for autonomy and how conflicts with this principle can be justified. Five potential justifications for state-sponsored health communications campaigns are re viewed : (1) the public's health as an independent value; (2) collective efficiency and majoritarian preferences; (3) third party or state's interests; (4) harm to the health of others; and (5) countering the short-term contingencies of a market.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Paisley WJ: Public communication campaigns, in RE Rice and WJ Paisley (eds.): Public Communications Campaigns. Beverly Hills, Sage, 1981.
2.
Hennigan KM, Flay BR, Cook TD: Give me the facts: Some suggestions for using social sscience knowledge in national policy making, in RF Kidd and MJ Saks (eds): Advances in Applied Social Psychology I. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.
3.
Warner KE: The effects of the anti-smoking campaign on cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health67:645-650,1977.
4.
Warner KE, Murt HA: Premature deaths avoided by the anti-smoking campaign. Am JPublic Health73:6, 672-677, 1983.
5.
Rice RE: Preface, in RE Rice and WJ Paisley (eds.): Public Communications Campaigns . Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1981.
6.
Farquar JH: The community-based model of lifestyle intervention trials. Am J Epidemial72:103-111, 1978.
7.
McAlister A. , et al.: Theory and action for health promotion: Illustrations from the North Karelia Project. Am JPublic Health72:43-50, 1982.
8.
Carlaw R. et al.: Organization for a community cardiovascular heart health program: Experiences from the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Health Educ Q11:243-252, 1984.
9.
Hersey J., Kilbanoff L., Lam D., Taylor R.: Promoting social support: The impact of California's "Friends can be Good Medicine" campaign. Health Educ Q11:293-311, 1984.
10.
Davis M., Iverson D.: An overview and analysis of the Health Style Campaign. Health Educ Q11:253-272,1984.
11.
McAlister A. : Mass communication and community organization for public health education. Am Psych35:375-379, 1980.
12.
Farquar JW, et al.: Community education for cardiovascular health. Lancet1192-1195, 1977.
13.
Faden R., Beauchamp T.: A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, Oxford University Press, 1986.
14.
Goethals GR: An attributional analysis of some social influence phenomena, in JH Harvey, WJ Ickes and RD Kidd (eds.): New Directions in Attribution Research I. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.
15.
Tversky A., Kahneman D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science , 211:453-511, 1981.
16.
Slovic P.: The psychology of protective behavior. Journal of Safety Research10:56-68, 1978.
17.
Cialdine RB , et al: Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost. J Pers Soc Psychol36:463-469, 1978.
18.
Robertson LS : The great seat belt campaign flap. Journal of Communications26:41-45, 1976.
