Twenty-seven studies were reviewed to determine whether school-based drug abuse prevention efforts have succeeded Most of the studies reviewed either did not examine program impact on actual drug using behavior or were not designed with a degree of scientific rigor sufficient to warrant acceptance of their findings as valid. Those studies leading to reliable results regarding program effect on drug use were contradictory in their conclusions. In view of the possibility that educational efforts aimed at drug abuse prevention may be counterproductive, it is suggested that school-based programs henceforward be designed and conducted as experiments with controlled manipulation of relevant variables.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amendolara FR : Modifying attitudes towards drugs in seventh grade students. J Drug Educ3:71-78, 1973.
2.
Berberian RM , Thompson WD, Kasl SV, Gould LC, Kleber HD: The relationship between drug education programs in the Greater New Haven schools and changes in drug use and drug-related beliefs and perceptions. Health Educ Monogr4:327-376. 1976.
3.
Blum RH, Bovet D., Moore J., and Associates: Controlling Drugs. San Francisco , Jossey-Bass, 1974.
4.
Campbell DT: Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychol Bull54:297-312, 1957.
5.
Campbell DT: Reforms as experiments. Am Psychol24:409-429, 1969.
6.
Campbell DT, Stanley JC: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, Rand McNally, 1963.
7.
Carney RE: An Evaluation of the Effect of a Values-Oriented Drug Abuse Education Program Using the Risk Taking Attitude Questionnaire. Coronado, Cal., Coronado Unified School District, March 1971.
8.
Dearden M., Jekel JF: A pilot program in high school drug education utilizing non-directive techniques and sensitivity training. J School Health41:118-124, 1971.
9.
Drug Education Is Linked to Use. New York Times , 3 December 1972.
10.
Drug Use Tied to Education, Study Shows Drug Abuse Increases with Education. Detroit Free Press, 1 December 1972.
11.
English GE: The effectiveness of emotional appeal vs fact giving drug education films . J School Health42:540-41, 1972.
12.
Geis G., et al: Addicts in the Classroom: The Impact of an Experimental Narcotics Program on Junior High School Pupils. A Report. Washington, DC, U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity, 1969.
13.
Goldstein JW : Drug education worthy of the name. Impact1:18-24, 1972.
14.
Herzog E.: Some Guidelines for Evaluation Research. Washington, DC , U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Children's Bureau, 1959.
15.
Horan JJ: Basic experimental designs. In Accountability in Drug Education: A Model for Evaluation. Washington, DC, Drug Abuse Council, Inc., 1973.
16.
Johnson B.: A junior high school seminar on dangerous drugs and narcotics. J School Health38:84-87, 1968.
17.
Kline JA: Evaluation of a multimedia drug education program. J Drug Educ2:229-239, September 1972.
18.
Kline JA, Wilson WM: Ex-addicts in drug abuse prevention education. Drug Forum1:357-366, 1972.
19.
Lawrence TS, Velleman JD: Correlates of student drug use in a suburban high school. Psychiatry37:129-136, May 1974.
20.
Lewis JH, Gossett JT, Phillips VA: Evaluation of a drug prevention program. Hoop Community Psychiatry23:124-26, April 1972.
21.
McCune DA: A Study of More Effective Education Relative to Narcotics, Other Harmful Drugs, and Hallucinogenic Substances. Progress report submitted to the California Legislature California State Department of Education, 1970.
22.
Macro Systems Inc: Evaluation of Drug Education Programs. U.S. DHEW, Contract no HEW-(OS)-71-173, June 1972.
23.
Martin GL, O'Rourke TW: The perceived effectiveness of selected programs and sources with respect to preventing the use of dangerous drugs. J Drug Educ2:329-35, 1972.
24.
Monroe JJ, English JE: The ascription of favorable and unfavorable characteristics to substance abusers by college age males. Unpublished.
25.
National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse.Drug Use in America: Problem in Perspective. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.
26.
Nowalk D.: Innovations in drug education. J School Health4:236-39, 1969.
27.
Nowlis H.: Drugs on the College Campus. New York, Doubleday, 1969.
28.
Number Nine Youth Crisis and Growth Center.Drug Use and the Youth Culture. Manuscript, New Haven, CT, 1972.
29.
O'Neal. TR, Shackleford L., Smith A.: Assessment of Adequacy of Drug Abuse Program (in Selected Inner City Schools) . Research Department, National Urban League, Inc., 1973.
30.
O'Rourke TW : Assessment of the effectiveness of the New York State Curriculum Guide with respect to drug education. J Drug Educ3:57-66, 1973.
31.
Richards L. : Evaluation in drug education. School Health Rev2:22-27, 1971.
32.
Schulberg HC, Sheldon AS, Baker F (eds): Program Evaluation in the Health Fields. New York, Behavioral Publications, 1969.
33.
Smart RG: Trapped administrators and evaluation of social and community development programs. Addictions19:48-49, Winter 1972 .
34.
Smith BC: Values clarification in drug education: A comparative study. J Drug Educ3:369-76, 1973.
35.
Stuart RB: Teaching facts about drugs: Pushing or preventing. J Educ Psychol66:189-201, April 1974.
36.
Suchman EA: Evaluative Research: Principles and Practices in Public Service and Social Action Programs. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.
37.
Swift B., Dorn N., Thompson A.: Evaluation of Drug Education: Findings of a National Research Study of Effects on Secondary School Students of Five Types of Lessons Given by Teachers. London, Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence , 1974.
38.
Swisher JD, Crawford J.: An evaluation of a short-term drug education program. School Counselor13:265-72, 1971.
39.
Swisher JD, Crawford J., Goldstein R., Yura M.: Drug education: Pushing or preventing? Peabody J Educ55:68-75, 1971.
40.
Swisher JD, Warner RW, Herr EI: Experimental comparison of four approaches tc drug abuse prevention among 9th and 11 th graders. J Couns Psychol19:328-32, 1972.
41.
Temporary New York State Commission to Evaluate the Drug Laws : Drug Abuse Prevention. Report, New York State Legislative Document No. 11, 1974.
42.
Tennant FS, Weaver SC, Lewis CE: Outcomes of drug education: Four case studies. Pediatrics52:246-51, August 1973.
43.
Thomas P., Frisone G., Lipson D.: An Evaluation of parent drug education. Ment Hygiene55:456-60, October 1971.
44.
U.S. Drug Drive Called a Failure in Reports Prepared for H.E.WNew York Times, 2 November 1972.
45.
Weaver SC, Tennant FS: Effectiveness of drug education programs in secondary schools. Am J Psychiatry130:812-14, July 1973.
46.
Woodcock J.: Action in the Schools. In Drug-Dealers — Taking Action: Options for International Response. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1973.
