Cannabis Users’ and Non-Users’ Differential Responses to Two Anti-Cannabis Campaigns

Abstract

Even though multiple states have approved legal recreational use of cannabis, the expansion of recreational cannabis legalization has led to public health concerns in the United States. Young adults (18–25 years old) have the highest percentage of cannabis use disorder compared to all other age groups. The purpose of this study is to compare cognitive and emotional responses of young adults who use cannabis and non-users to two anti-cannabis media campaigns that employed different message strategies. In total, 50 people (25 people who use cannabis and 25 non-users) participated in the study—a 2 (cannabis use status: people who currently use cannabis/non-users) × 2 (Public Service Advertising [PSA] campaign: Don’t be a Lab Rat-Informational/Stoner Sloth-Narrative) × 3 (message replication) experiment. Participants viewed six messages based on the combinations of each of the three message replications within two campaigns. Participants’ facial emotional responses were recorded during message exposure. Self-report questions were asked after viewing each message. Self-report indices showed no differences between the two campaigns for participants who use cannabis and non-users. However, after controlling for individual differences, participants who use cannabis displayed more negative emotional responses to the Don’t be a Lab Rat messages than to the Stoner Sloth messages. Conversely, cannabis users experienced more positive emotional responses to the Stoner Sloth messages than to the Don’t be a Lab Rat messages. The study provides insights for message design in public health campaigns addressing cannabis use, suggesting that psychophysiological measures can be helpful in providing insights into responses not detected by traditional self-report measures.

Keywords

cannabis anti-cannabis messages public health campaigns Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing facial action coding

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adinoff

Reiman

(2019). Implementing social justice in the transition from illicit to legal cannabis. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 45, 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2019.1674862

Alvaro

E. M.

Crano

W. D.

Siegel

J. T.

Hohman

Johnson

Nakawaki

(2013). Adolescents’ attitudes toward antimarijuana ads, usage intentions, and actual marijuana usage. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(4), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031960

Azofeifa

Mattson

M. E.

Schauer

McAfee

Grant

Lyerla

(2016). National estimates of marijuana use and related indicators—National Survey on Drug Use and Health, United States, 2002–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 65(11), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6511a1externalicon

Boakye

Obisesan

O. H.

Uddin

S. I.

El-Shahawy

Dzaye

Osei

A. D.

Benjamin

E. J.

Stokes

A. C.

Robertson

R. M.

Bhatnagar

Blaha

M. J.

(2021). Cannabis vaping among adults in the United States: Prevalence, trends, and association with high-risk behaviors and adverse respiratory conditions. Preventive Medicine, 153, 106800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106800

Bolls

P. D.

(2002). I can hear you, but can I see you? The use of visual cognition during exposure to high-imagery radio advertisements. Communication Research, 29, 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236194

Bradley

M. M.

Lang

P. J.

(1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

Brehm

J. W.

(1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.

Brehm

S. S.

Brehm

J. W.

(1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Gardner

W. L.

(1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1146.annurev.psych.50.1.191

10.

Clayton

R. B.

(2022). On the psychophysiological and defensive nature of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Communication, 72(4), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac016

11.

Clayton

R. B.

(2023). Psychophysiological response to using digital media. In Nabi

R. L.

Myrick

J. G.

(Eds.). Emotions in the digital world (pp. 55–75). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197520536.003.0004

12.

Clayton

R. B.

Keene

J. R.

Leshner

Lang

Bailey

R. L.

(2020). Smoking status matters: A direct comparison of smokers’ and nonsmokers’ psychophysiological and self-report responses to secondhand smoke anti-tobacco PSAs. Health Communication, 35(8), 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1598741

13.

Clayton

R. B.

Leshner

Bolls

P. D.

Thorson

(2017). Discard the smoking cues—Keep the disgust: An investigation of tobacco smokers’ motivated processing of anti-tobacco commercials. Health Communication, 32(11), 1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1220042

14.

Clayton

R. B.

Leshner

Sanders-Jackson

Hendrickse

(2020). When counterarguing becomes the primary task: Examination of dogmatic anti-vaping messages on psychological reactance, available cognitive resources, and memory. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 522–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa010

15.

Clayton

R. B.

Leshner

Tomko

R. L.

Trull

T. J.

Piasecki

T. M.

(2017). Countering craving with disgust images: Examining nicotine withdrawn smokers’ motivated message processing of anti-tobacco public service announcements. Journal of Health Communication, 22(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1268222

16.

Compton

W. M.

Baler

(2016). The epidemiology of DSM-5 cannabis use disorders among US adults: Science to inform clinicians working in a shifting social landscape. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(6), 551–553. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030314

17.

Crano

W. D.

Alvaro

E. M.

Tan

C. N.

Siegel

J. T.

(2017). Social mediation of persuasive media in adolescent substance prevention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31(4), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000265

18.

Dillard

J. P.

Peck

(2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027004003

19.

Dillard

J. P.

Weber

K. M.

Vail

R. G.

(2007). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x

20.

Farrelly

M. C.

Duke

J. C.

Nonnemaker

MacMonegle

A. J.

Alexander

T. N.

Zhao

Delahanty

J. C.

Rao

Allen

J. A.

(2017). Association between The Real Cost media campaign and smoking initiation among youths—United States, 2014–2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(2), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6602a2

21.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

22.

Fisher

J. T.

Huskey

Keene

J. R.

Weber

(2018). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing: Looking to the future. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(4), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1534551

23.

Fisher

J. T.

Huskey

Keene

J. R.

Weber

(2020). The life of a model: Commentary on “How the LC4MP became the DHCCST.” In Weber

Floyd

(Eds.), Handbook of communication science and biology (pp. 409–415). Routledge.

24.

Frosch

(2014, October 5). Colorado “Lab Rat” campaign warns teens of pot use. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/lab-rat-ads-warn-teens-of-pot-use-1412560470

25.

Ginsburg

H. J.

Czyzewska

(2005). National anti-marijuana ads compared to anti-tobacco ads: Differences between immediate favorable and unfavorable post-viewing written comments. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(3), 367–367.

26.

Green

M. C.

Brock

T. C.

Kaufman

G. F.

(2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x

27.

Greene

Brinn

L. S.

(2003). Messages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/713852118

28.

Hasin

D. S.

Shmulewitz

Sarvet

A. L.

(2019). Time trends in US cannabis use and cannabis use disorders overall and by sociodemographic subgroups: A narrative review and new findings. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 45, 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2019.1569668

29.

Hill

K. P.

(2019). Medical use of cannabis in 2019. Journal of the American Medical Association, 322(10), 974–975. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11868

30.

Hornik

Jacobsohn

Orwin

Piesse

Kalton

(2008). Effects of the national youth anti-drug media campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98(12), 2229–2236. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.125849

31.

Hunt

(1995, December 20). “Stoner sloth” anti-drug campaign drives traffic to site promoting cannabis use. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/dec/21/stoner-sloth-anti-drug-campaign-drives-traffic-to-site-promoting-cannabis-use

32.

Huskey

Wilcox

Clayton

R. B.

Keene

J. R.

(2020). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing: Meta-analytically summarizing two decades of research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 322–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1839939

33.

iMotions Biometric Research Platform v. 7.1 . (2018). iMotions A/S.

34.

Labov

Waletzky

(1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm

(Ed.), Essays in the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). University of Washington Press. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar

35.

“Lab Rat” teen pot campaign is a worthy effort. (2014, August 11). The Denver Post. https://www.denverpost.com/2014/08/11/lab-rat-teen-pot-campaign-is-a-worthy-effort/

36.

Lang

(2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x

37.

Lang

(2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In Nabi

Oliver

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–204). Sage.

38.

Lang

P. J.

Bradley

M. M.

(2008). Appetitive and defensive motivation in the substrate of emotion. In Elliot

A. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 51–66). Psychology Press.

39.

Larsen

J. T.

Berntson

G. G.

Poehlmann

K. M.

Ito

T. A.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2008). The psychophysiology of emotion. In Lewis

Haviland-Jones

J. M.

Barrett

L. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 180–195). The Guilford Press.

40.

Leshner

(2014). The basics of experimental research in media studies. In Darling-Wolf

(Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media studies: Research methods in media studies (pp. 236–254). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems181

41.

Leshner

Bolls

Gardner

Moore

Kreuter

(2018). Breast cancer survivor testimonies: Effects of narrative and emotional valence on affect and cognition. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1426281. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1426281

42.

Leshner

Bolls

Thomas

(2009). Scare ‘em or disgust ‘em: The effects of graphic health promotion messages. Health Communication, 24, 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230903023493

43.

Leshner

Bolls

Wise

(2011). Motivated processing of fear appeal and disgust images in televised anti-tobacco ads. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000037

44.

Leshner

Stevens

E. M.

Cohn

A. M.

Kim

Wagener

T. L.

Villanti

A. C.

(2021). Cognitive and affective responses to marijuana prevention and educational messaging. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 225, 108788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108788

45.

Leung

Chiu

Chan

G. C. K.

Stjepanović

Hall

W. D.

(2019). What have been the public health impacts of cannabis legalisation in the USA? A review of evidence on adverse and beneficial effects. Current Addiction Reports, 6, 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00291-x

46.

Lipari

R. N.

Hedden

S. L.

Hughes

(2014). Substance use and mental health estimates from the 2013 national survey on drug use and health: Overview of findings [The CBHSQ Report]. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK385055/

47.

McQueen

Kreuter

M. W.

Kalesan

Alcaraz

(2011). Understanding narrative effects: The impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing: Attitudes and believes in African American women. Health Psychology, 30, 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025395

48.

Murphy-Hoefer

Davis

K. C.

Beistle

King

B. A.

Duke

Rodes

Graffunder

(2018). Impact of the Tips from Former Smokers campaign on population-level smoking cessation, 2012–2015. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, 180051. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180051

49.

Nabi

R. L.

Myrick

J. G.

(2019). Uplifting fear appeals: Considering the role of hope in fear-based persuasive messages. Health Communication, 34(4), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1422847

50.

Nabi

R. L.

Prestin

(2016). Unrealistic hope and unnecessary fear: Exploring how sensationalistic news stories influence health behavior motivation. Health Communication, 31(9), 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1045237

51.

Nonnemaker

J. M.

Silber-Ashley

Farrelly

M. C.

Dench

(2012). Parent-child communication and marijuana initiation: Evidence using discrete-time survival analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 37(12), 1342–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.07.006

52.

Pew Research Center. (2021, April 26). 6 facts about Americans and marijuana. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/26/facts-about-marijuana/

53.

Pew Research Center. (2022, November 22). Americans overwhelmingly say marijuana should be legal for medical or recreational use. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/11/22/americans-overwhelmingly-say-marijuana-should-be-legal-for-medical-or-recreational-use/

54.

Potter

R. F.

Bolls

(2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. Routledge.

55.

Ravaja

(2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6(2), 193–235. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_4

56.

Rice

R. E.

Atkin

C. K.

(2012). Public communication campaigns. Sage.

57.

Sarbin

(1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. Praeger Publishers; Greenwood Publishing Group.

58.

Schneider

E. F.

Lang

Shin

Bradley

S. D.

(2004). Death with a story: How story impacts emotional, motivation, and physiological responses to first-person shooter video games. Human Communication Research, 30, 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00736.x

59.

Schulenberg

J. E.

Johnston

L. D.

O’Malley

P. M.

Bachman

J. G.

Miech

R. A.

Patrick

M. E.

(2020). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2019: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19–60. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.

60.

Slater

Rouner

(2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x

61.

Stevens

E. M.

Cohn

A. M.

Villanti

A. C.

Leshner

Wedel

Wagener

T. L.

(2019). Perceived effectiveness of anti-marijuana messages in adult users and nonusers: An examination of responses to messages about marijuana’s effects on cognitive performance, driving, and health. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 80(4), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2019.80.415

62.

Stevens

E. M.

Leshner

Cohn

A. M.

Kim

Wagener

T. L.

(2021). How cannabis use status affects responses to anti-cannabis messages. Cannabis, 4(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2021.02.001

63.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2021). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2020 national survey on drug use and health (pp. 1–156).

64.

Sykes

(2022, November, 9). Here’s how five states voted on the legalization of recreational marijuana. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/09/heres-how-five-states-voted-on-the-legalization-of-recreational-marijuana.html

65.

Thorson

Wicks

Leshner

(2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430066

66.

Volkow

N. D.

Baler

R. D.

Compton

W. M.

Weiss

S. R.

(2014). Adverse health effects of marijuana use. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(23), 2219–2227. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1402309

67.

Wahlquist

(2019, December 19). “Stoner sloth” anti-drug campaign gets reality check as medical experts walk away. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/dec/20/stoner-sloth-anti-drug-campaign-gets-reality-check-as-medical-experts-walk-away

68.

Wang

Lang

(2006). Ad placement matters: A psychophysiological examination of program context effects on advertising processing. Psychophysiology, 43, S104.

69.

Witte

(1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328

70.

Zimmerman

Cupp

P. K.

Abadi

Donohew

R. L.

Gray

Gordon

Grossl

A. B.

(2014). The effects of framing and fear on ratings and impact of antimarijuana PSAs. Substance Use & Misuse, 49(7), 824–835. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.880721

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB